ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: L07

The Classification Criteria for Anti-Synthetase Syndrome (Class) Project

Giovanni Zanframundo1, Sara Faghihi Kashani2, Akira Yoshida3, Eduardo Dourado4, Iazsmin Bauer Ventura5, Daphne Rivero Gallegos6, Aravinthan Loganathan7, Gianluca Sambataro8, Francisca Bozan9, Sangmee Bae10, Darosa Lim11, Marta Cheli12, Yasuhiko Yamano13, Francesco Bonella14, Tamera Corte15, Tracy J. Doyle16, David Fiorentino17, Miguel Gonzalez-Gay18, Marie Hudson19, Masataka Kuwana20, Ingrid Lundberg21, Andrew Mammen22, Neil McHugh23, Frederick Miller24, Carlomaurizio Montecucco1, Chester Oddis25, Jorge Rojas-Serrano6, Jens Schmidt26, Carlo Alberto Scirè27, Albert Selva-O'Callaghan28, Victoria Werth11, Davide Rozza29, Monica Morosini30, Sara Bozzini30, Lorenzo Cavagna1, Rohit Aggarwal25 and the CLASS project investigators, 1Università di Pavia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy, 2University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA and University of California, San Francisco, CA, 3Nippon Medical School Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 4Unidade Local de Saùde da Regiao de Aveiro and Aveiro Rheumatology Research Centre, Aveiro, Portugal; Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal, 5University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 6Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Ismael Cosío Villegas, Mexico City, Mexico, 7Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases and University of Bath, UK; Arthritis Australia, Broadway, Glebe, NSW, Australia, 8University of Enna "Kore", Enna, Italy, 9Hospital Clinico Universidad de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile, 10UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 11University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 12Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Milano, Italy, 13Tosei General Hospital, Aichi, Japan, 14University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany, 15Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, 16Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 17Stanford University, Redwood City, CA, 18IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain, 19McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 20Nippon Medical School Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, 21Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, 22NIH, Bethesda, MD, 23University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom, 24NIH, NIEHS, Durham, NC, 25University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 26University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany, 27Univeristy of Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy and IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori Foundation, Monza, Italy, 28Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain, 29Italian Society for Rheumatology, Milano, Italy, 30Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Hospital of Pavia, Pavia, Italy

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Date of first publication: October 24, 2024

Keywords: classification criteria, Late-Breaking 2024, Myositis, pulmonary

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 18, 2024

Title: (L01–L14) Late-Breaking Posters

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: The aim of this study was to develop and validate new classification criteria for Anti-Synthetase Syndrome (ASSD) using data and consensus driven methodologies and global participation.

Methods: A literature review identified features used to define ASSD and develop initial variable list, which was used for data collection of cases and controls.

Two distinct but complementary approaches were adopted to develop new candidate criteria: data-driven analysis of patient information and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) under steering committee (SC) involving expert rheumatologists, dermatologists, neurologists, and pulmonologists worldwide.

Data on ASSD cases and controls (mimickers of ASSD) were collected through RedCap database. Patient information included demographics, symptoms, laboratory tests, and anti-synthetase antibody results. A preliminary univariate analysis was conducted to inform a multivariate analysis resulting in the data-driven candidate model using derivation dataset followed by internal validation. The MCDA method involved ranking and scoring the importance of different clinical features for ASSD classification, resulting in weighted score-based criteria followed by internal validation on clinical vignette.

Patients’ serum was tested for anti-synthetase antibodies using a central gold standard method to develop a Gold standard dataset for validation. Cases and controls not used for derivation developed an independent validation cohort.

The experts selected the best model through a Consensus Conference performed with Nominal Group Technique.

Results: CLASS project database included 120 variables collected on cases (N=1952) and controls (N=2097), with 19% of patients centrally tested for antibodies. A SC comprising of 20 prominent myositis experts, identified one and three candidate models from the data-driven and the MCDA approaches, respectively.

After discussion and refinement, consensus was developed on a final set of criteria based on its face validity, ease of use, feasibility and performance in both MCDA-based clinical vignettes and real-world data (Fig. 1).

The final criteria define two levels of classification: Probable and Definite ASSD. Both levels require the presence of at least one core clinical feature (arthritis, myositis, or lung disease) and assign points based on additional features and anti-synthetase antibody status. In addition, definite ASSD requires confirmation by anti-synthetase antibody testing. The criteria for Definite ASSD displayed a sensitivity/specificity of 86.8/99.2% on the independent validation dataset and 94.3/99.7% on the gold standard dataset. The criteria for Probable ASSD displayed a sensitivity/specificity of 92.7/87.3% on the independent validation dataset and 97.5/87.5% on the gold standard dataset (Fig. 2 and 3).

Conclusion: Novel, data and consensus driven classification criteria for ASSD have been established with excellent validity, feasibility and global consensus. These criteria should improve the consistency and accuracy of ASSD classification across the world and facilitate future research.

The project was funded by ACR/EULAR and ASSD criteria will be submitted for their approval.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1: The classification criteria for Anti-synthetase syndrome

Supporting image 2

Figure 2: performance of Define ASSD on A) Independent validation dataset and B) Gold standard dataset

Supporting image 3

Figure 3: performance of Probable ASSD on a) Independent validation dataset and b) Gold standard dataset


Disclosures: G. Zanframundo: None; S. Faghihi Kashani: None; A. Yoshida: None; E. Dourado: None; I. Bauer Ventura: None; D. Rivero Gallegos: None; A. Loganathan: None; G. Sambataro: Boehringer-Ingelheim, 6; F. Bozan: None; S. Bae: None; D. Lim: None; M. Cheli: None; Y. Yamano: None; F. Bonella: AstraZeneca, 12, support for attending meetings/travel, Atyr, 12, Support for attending meetings and/or travel, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 1, 2, 6, 12, support for attending meetings/travel, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 1, 2, Sanofi, 1, 2, 6, Savara Pharma, 2, 12, Support for attending meetings and/or travel; T. Corte: 4D, 2, 5, Avalyn Therapeutics, 1, 2, 5, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 1, 2, 5, 6, 12, support for attending meetings/travel, Bridge Biotherapeutics, 1, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 1, 2, 5, 6, 12, support for attending meetings/travel, Cincera, 2, DevPro, 1, 2, Endeavour BioMedicine, 1, 2, Pharmaxis, 2, 5, Pliant, 1, 2, 5, Roche, 1, 2, 5, 6; T. Doyle: Bayer, 5, Genentech, 5, Sanofi, 3, 5; D. Fiorentino: Argenx, 2, Biogen, 2, Kyverna, 2, Pfizer, 2, Priovant, 2, Serono, 5; M. Gonzalez-Gay: None; M. Hudson: AstraZeneca, 6, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, 5, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 5, Merck/MSD, 6; M. Kuwana: Argenx, 1, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, 5, 6, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, MBL, 5, 9; I. Lundberg: Boehringer-Ingelheim, 6, Novartis, 11, Roche, 11; A. Mammen: None; N. McHugh: None; F. Miller: Hope Pharmaceuticals, 5; C. Montecucco: None; C. Oddis: None; J. Rojas-Serrano: None; J. Schmidt: CSL Behring, 2, 6, 12, Support for attending meetings and/or travel, Griflos, 2, Janssen, 2, Kezar, 5, Takeda, 2, 6, UCB, 6; C. Scirè: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, 12, Galapagos - Grant/Research support; A. Selva-O'Callaghan: None; V. Werth: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, Akari, 2, Amgen, 2, 5, Argenx, 2, AstraZeneca, 1, 2, 5, Bayer, 2, Beacon Bioscience, 2, Biogen, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 5, Cabaletta Bio, 2, Calyx, 2, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, 5, Corcept, 2, Crisalis, 2, CSL Behring, 2, 5, Cugene, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, EMD Sorona, 2, Gilead, 2, 5, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Horizon, 2, 5, Incyte, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, Kezar, 2, Kwoya Kirin, 2, Merck/MSD, 2, Nektar, 2, Nuvig Pharmaceuticals, 2, Octapharma, 2, Pfizer, 2, 5, Priovant, 5, Regeneron, 2, 5, Rome Pharmaceuticals, 2, 5, Sanofi, 2, Takeda, 2, UCB, 2, Viela Bio, 2; D. Rozza: None; M. Morosini: None; S. Bozzini: None; L. Cavagna: Boehringer-Ingelheim, 1, 6, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 6; R. Aggarwal: Alexion, 2, ANI Pharmaceuticals, 2, Argenx, 2, Artasome, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 5, Cabaletta Bio, 2, Capella Bioscience, 2, Capstanx, 2, Corbus, 2, CSL Behring, 2, EMD Serono, 2, 5, Galapagos, 2, Horizon Therapeutics, 2, I-Cell, 2, Immunovant, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, Kezar, 2, Kyverna, 2, Lilly, 2, Mallinckrodt, 5, Manta Medicines Corporation, 2, Novartis, 2, Nuvig Therapeutics, 2, Octapharma, 2, Pfizer, 2, 5, Q32, 5, Roivant, 2, Sanofi, 2, Teva, 2, Tourmaline Bio, 2, Verismo Therapeutics, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Zanframundo G, Faghihi Kashani S, Yoshida A, Dourado E, Bauer Ventura I, Rivero Gallegos D, Loganathan A, Sambataro G, Bozan F, Bae S, Lim D, Cheli M, Yamano Y, Bonella F, Corte T, Doyle T, Fiorentino D, Gonzalez-Gay M, Hudson M, Kuwana M, Lundberg I, Mammen A, McHugh N, Miller F, Montecucco C, Oddis C, Rojas-Serrano J, Schmidt J, Scirè C, Selva-O'Callaghan A, Werth V, Rozza D, Morosini M, Bozzini S, Cavagna L, Aggarwal R. The Classification Criteria for Anti-Synthetase Syndrome (Class) Project [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-classification-criteria-for-anti-synthetase-syndrome-class-project/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-classification-criteria-for-anti-synthetase-syndrome-class-project/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology