ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2301

The Added Value of anti-Ro52 Antibody Titer in the Diagnosis of Sjögren’s Disease

Silvia Fonzetti1, Caterina Porciani2, Valentina Donati3, Davide Testa4, Giovanni Fulvio1, Gaetano La Rocca1, Inmaculada Conception Navarro García1, Francesco Ferro5, Marta Mosca1, Paola Migliorini6 and Chiara Baldini1, 1University of Pisa, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine - Rheumatology Unit, Pisa, Italy, 2University of Pisa, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine - Immmunology and Allergology Unit, Pisa, Italy, 3Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Unit of Pathological Anatomy 2, Pisa, Italy, 4Immunology Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, 5Clinical and Experimental Medicine Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Pisa, Italy, 6Immunology Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Autoantibody(ies), classification criteria, Sjögren's syndrome

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 18, 2024

Title: Sjögren's Syndrome – Basic & Clinical Science Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Isolated anti-Ro52 antibodies (anti-Ro52) influence the ACR/EULAR 2016 classification criteria of Sjögren’s Disease (SD), meaning that patients with isolated anti-Ro52 positivity and abnormal salivary or lachrymal functional tests may fulfill the criteria avoiding a labial gland biopsy (LSGB).  However, anti-Ro52 can be detected in patients with a broad spectrum of other autoimmune disorders; therefore, their role in SD classification remains a matter of debate. We hypothesize that anti-Ro52 levels might be associated with a positive LSGB. The purpose of this study was therefore: 1. To investigate the correlation between anti-Ro52 titers and histological findings in patients with suspected SD consecutively undergoing LSGB. 2. To analyze the correlation between anti-Ro52 levels and SD-related disease features in the subgroup of patients with isolated anti-Ro52 positivity.

Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing an LSGB for suspected SD were included. Clinical and histological data were collected. Serum from each patient was tested for anti-Ro52, and anti-Ro60, with commercially available immunoblot, thus analyzing the quantitative titer of the autoantibodies with band densitometry. Patients were divided into three groups according to anti-Ro52 above the third and below the first percentile. Descriptive statistics were performed with SPSS software.

Results: We included 175 (F:M=160:15) patients, median age 54 (IQR 45-64).  The majority (88/175, 50.3%) presented a double positivity for Ro60/Ro52, 27/175 (15.4%) an isolated positivity for anti-Ro60 and 60/175 (34.3%) an isolated positivity for anti-Ro52. The diagnosis of SD was confirmed in 147/175 patients. Titers of anti Ro-52 significantly correlated with anti-Ro60 (r=0.358, p< 0.001) and anti-SSB titers (r=0.364, p< 0.001) as well as with LSG FS (r=460, p< 0.001), number of foci (p< 0.404, p< 0.001) and GC (r=0.364, p< 0.001) and SGUS score. Moreover, anti-Ro52 titer fairly correlated with RF (r=0.268, p< 0.01), IgG (r=0.301, p< 0.001), and ESSDAI score (r=0.281, p< 0.001) and inversely with lymphocytes count (r=-0.171, p< 0.05) and C4 (r=-0.233, p< 0.01). No correlation was found between anti-Ro-52 levels, sicca symptoms, ESSPRI and the results of either the oral or ocular tests. When we limited the analysis to the 60/175 patients with isolated Ro52, those 12/60 (20%) with anti-Ro52 titer above the third percentile satisfied the 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for SD in all the cases, presented the highest FS (p< 0.01) (FIG 1), numbers of foci (p< 0.01) and presence of GCs (p< 0.05) and showed more frequently an OMERACT SGUS≥2 (p< 0.05) with respect to the rest of the patients with isolated Ro-52.

Conclusion: This study suggests that anti-Ro52 titer seems to correlate with LSG histology and may help to identify a more homogeneous subset of patient with more severe glandular inflammation among subjects with isolated Ro52. Further studies are warranted to establish whether anti-Ro52 should be separately considered in SD classification criteria.

Supporting image 1


Disclosures: S. Fonzetti: None; C. Porciani: None; V. Donati: None; D. Testa: None; G. Fulvio: None; G. La Rocca: None; I. Navarro García: None; F. Ferro: None; M. Mosca: AbbVie, 2, 6, AstraZeneca, 2, 6, GSK, 2, 5, 6, Idorsia, 2, Janssen, 6, Lilly, 6, Otsuka, 2, 6, UCB, 2; P. Migliorini: None; C. Baldini: Amgen, 1, 2, Aurinia, 1, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, 5, 6, 12, Paid Instructor, johnson & johnson, 1, Novartis, 5, Sanofi, 2, 6, 12, Paid Instructor, Viela, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Fonzetti S, Porciani C, Donati V, Testa D, Fulvio G, La Rocca G, Navarro García I, Ferro F, Mosca M, Migliorini P, Baldini C. The Added Value of anti-Ro52 Antibody Titer in the Diagnosis of Sjögren’s Disease [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-added-value-of-anti-ro52-antibody-titer-in-the-diagnosis-of-sjogrens-disease/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-added-value-of-anti-ro52-antibody-titer-in-the-diagnosis-of-sjogrens-disease/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology