ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: L20

Telitacicept, a Human Recombinant Fusion Protein Targeting and Neutralizing B Lymphocyte Stimulator (BlyS) and a Proliferation-Inducing Ligand (APRIL), in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients with an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate (MTX): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study

Li Wang1, Dong Xu2, Jianmin Fang3, Qing Zuraw4 and Fengchun Zhang1, 1Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China, 2Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Dong Cheng District, China, 3RemeGen Co, Ltd., Yantai, China, 4RemeGen Biosciences, Inc., San Francisco, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Date of first publication: October 24, 2023

Keywords: autoimmune diseases, clinical trial, Late-Breaking 2023, radiography, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Wednesday, November 15, 2023

Title: Late-Breaking Abstract Session

Session Type: Late-Breaking Abstract Session

Session Time: 7:30AM-9:00AM

Background/Purpose: Telitacicept is a recombinant fusion protein targeting and neutralizing BLyS and APRIL. This phase 3, randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy and safety of telitacicept 160 mg versus placebo in RA patients with an inadequate response to MTX.

Methods: This was a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study with an open label treatment follow up period from week 25 to 48 (NCT03016013).Patients with moderate-to-severe RA with an inadequate response to MTX were randomized 3:1 to receive either telitacicept 160 mg or placebo QW for 24 weeks. After Week 24, patients in the placebo arm were switched to telitacicept 160 mg QW for an additional 24 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving an ACR20 response at Week 24.Secondary efficacy endpoints included response rates for ACR50 and ACR70, individual components of the ACR response, DAS28-ESR, and radiographic joint damage as measured by the mTSS at Week 24.

Results: A total of 479 patients were randomized to receive telitacicept 160 mg (N=360) or placebo (N=119). Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were similar between the two groups, with the exception of CRP level which was higher for telitacicept versus placebo (22.856 mg/L vs. 17.287 mg/L).The primary endpoint was met with significantly more patients in the telitacicept 160 mg group achieving an ACR20 response at Week 24 compared with the placebo group (60.0% vs 26.9%, P< 0.001) (Figure 1). At Week 24, the proportion of patients achieving an ACR50 response was significantly higher in the telitacicept 160 mg group compared with placebo (21.4% vs. 5.9%, P< 0.001) and the reductions from baseline in the DAS28-ESR as well as the individual components of the ACR criteria were significantly greater for patients receiving telitacicept compared with placebo (Table 1). Significantly more patients in the telitacicept 160 mg group showed no radiographic progression (△mTSS ≤0) at Week 24 compared with placebo (90.2% vs 66.4%, P< 0.001). Additionally, patients in the telitacicept 160 mg group showed significantly less progression of joint damage (as measured by mTSS, joint space narrowing score, erosion score) from baseline to Week 24 ( Table 1). The incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), TEAEs leading to discontinuation from study treatment, and infections were similar between the telitacicept 160 mg group and placebo group (Table 2). No patient deaths occurred during the study.

Conclusion: These phase 3 study results demonstrate the efficacy (e.g., responses in the ACR20, ACR50, and DAS28-ESR; and no radiographic progression measured by mTSS) and safety of telitacicept in treating moderate-to-severe RA patients with an inadequate response to MTX.

Supporting image 1

ACR20 Response Rate Through Week 24 (NRI, FAS).
#P<0.001 vs. Placebo. NRI, missing data were imputed as non-response. FAS, full analysis set.

Supporting image 2

Secondary Efficacy Endpoints and Radiographic Endpoints at Week 24 (FAS).#Missing data were imputed by non-responder imputation (NRI).
*Missing data were imputed by last observation carried forward method (LOCF).
+Missing data were not imputed, the observed values were analyzed.
FAS, full analysis set.

Supporting image 3

Summary of Adverse Events Through Week 24
AE, adverse event; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event; SAE, serious adverse event; SOC, system organ class.
*AEs with an incidence of ≥3% in any group were listed.


Disclosures: L. Wang: None; D. Xu: None; J. Fang: RemeGen, Ltd., 3, 4, 8, 10, 11; Q. Zuraw: RemeGen, 3, 11; F. ZHANG: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Wang L, Xu D, Fang J, Zuraw Q, ZHANG F. Telitacicept, a Human Recombinant Fusion Protein Targeting and Neutralizing B Lymphocyte Stimulator (BlyS) and a Proliferation-Inducing Ligand (APRIL), in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients with an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate (MTX): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/telitacicept-a-human-recombinant-fusion-protein-targeting-and-neutralizing-b-lymphocyte-stimulator-blys-and-a-proliferation-inducing-ligand-april-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-ra-patients-with-an-in/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/telitacicept-a-human-recombinant-fusion-protein-targeting-and-neutralizing-b-lymphocyte-stimulator-blys-and-a-proliferation-inducing-ligand-april-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-ra-patients-with-an-in/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology