ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1933

Telemedicine for Under-resourced Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Views and Experiences of Patients and Rheumatology Health Care Professionals

Sebastian Bruera1, Savannah Bowman1, Keshia Ferguson1, MaryJo Maliekel1, Maria A. Lopez-Olivo2, Maria Suarez-Almazor3, Maria I. ("Maio") Danila4, Jinoos Yazdany5 and Sandeep Agarwal1, 1Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 2The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 3MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 4University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, 5UCSF, San Francisco, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Access to care, Qualitative Research, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 18, 2024

Title: Health Services Research – ACR/ARP Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: There is a paucity of knowledge regarding the benefits and limitations of telemedicine in patients with SLE, particularly in those with under-resourced backgrounds. We aimed to assess the experiences and views on telemedicine of both people with SLE and their health care team members in a safety net setting.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured in-person interviews of patients in a publicly-funded clinic in Harris County, Texas with SLE and health care professionals including Rheumatologists, nurses, medical assistants, and a fellow. Interviews were transcribed and then coded using inductive and deductive approaches. Data collected proceeded until thematic saturation was reached. Themes and subthemes were identified and visualized using Levesque’s Conceptual Framework for improving access to healthcare.

Results: Fourteen interviews were conducted. Participants included eight health care professionals and six patients with SLE (Table 1), all of whom had previously participated in telemedicine visits. Five themes were considered as major domains, including: 1) Access, Convenience, and Economic Considerations, 2) Technological factors, 3) Quality of Care, 4) Disease Management and Outcomes, and 5) Implementation of Telemedicine (Figure 1). Patients and professionals generally perceived telemedicine as a means to improve access to care and enhance convenience for patients, particularly those with transportation difficulties and physical disabilities. While telemedicine was viewed as having many potential benefits, there was concern amongst both patients and providers about digital literacy and access to technology. The perceived impact of telemedicine on the quality of care in patients with SLE varied amongst participants. Rheumatologists and nurses expressed concern about its negative impact on the physician-patient relationship and the limited ability to conduct physical examinations. Health care professionals also generally perceived telemedicine to be appropriate for stable patients with low disease activity. However, the suitability of telemedicine for SLE flares varied amongst participants. Rheumatologists generally felt disease flares were better managed through in-person visits, whereas some patients and nurses perceived telemedicine to be beneficial for flares because of quicker access to a clinician. Both patients and health care professionals made recommendations to facilitate implementation of telemedicine including providing patients with adequate training on telemedicine platforms either through tutorials or in person training, ensuring access to adequate technology, and establishing protocols and technical support during virtual visits.

Conclusion: In this qualitative study, barriers to telemedicine including digital literacy, possible impact on physician-patient relationship, and language barriers, were identified. By addressing these challenges and leveraging the benefits of telemedicine, we have the opportunity to improve access to care in patients with SLE, particularly from under-resourced backgrounds.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2


Disclosures: S. Bruera: None; S. Bowman: None; K. Ferguson: None; M. Maliekel: None; M. Lopez-Olivo: None; M. Suarez-Almazor: Syneos Health, 1; M. Danila: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, Pfizer, 5; J. Yazdany: AstraZeneca, 2, Aurinia, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, UCB, 2; S. Agarwal: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Bruera S, Bowman S, Ferguson K, Maliekel M, Lopez-Olivo M, Suarez-Almazor M, Danila M, Yazdany J, Agarwal S. Telemedicine for Under-resourced Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Views and Experiences of Patients and Rheumatology Health Care Professionals [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/telemedicine-for-under-resourced-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-a-qualitative-study-exploring-the-views-and-experiences-of-patients-and-rheumatology-health-care-professionals/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/telemedicine-for-under-resourced-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-a-qualitative-study-exploring-the-views-and-experiences-of-patients-and-rheumatology-health-care-professionals/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology