ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1546

Tacrolimus Versus Voclosporin for Active Lupus Nephritis: A Comparative Meta-analysis of Renal Response

Urvi Zala1 and Rushi Patel2, 1Loyola MacNeal Hospital, Berwyn, IL, Oak Park, IL, 2Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas, Beumont, TX

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Lupus nephritis, meta-analysis, Renal

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (1517–1552) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Treatment Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Lupus nephritis (LN) is seen in approximately 40–60 % of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality in this population. The definitive diagnosis is made with a kidney biopsy, and disease severity is classified according to the International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) system, which guides management. The approach to active class III and IV LN involves glucocorticoids and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), with the addition of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) based on patient characteristics. CNIs exert potent immunosuppressive effects by blocking T-lymphocyte activation and inhibiting the production of interleukin-2 and have traditionally been used as immunosuppression in renal transplantation. Through this meta-analysis, we aim to compare the use of the CNIs tacrolimus (TAC) and Voclosporin (VOC) in active LN.

Methods: A comprehensive review of PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was performed to locate relevant clinical trials. Five randomized controlled trials (n = 1 311) met inclusion criteria. Three trials compared TAC with conventional induction regimens (cyclophosphamide or MMF; n = 777). Two placebo-controlled trials evaluated VOC on an MMF/low-dose-steroid background (n = 534). Pooled risk ratios (RRs) were determined using Mantel–Haenszel common-effect and random-effects models. Heterogeneity among studies was evaluated with I² and τ² metrics. An indirect Bucher comparison was conducted to analyze differences between TAC and VOC. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: We evaluated five studies in total with the network meta-analysis framework. TAC was associated with a significant increase in complete/partial renal response (RR = 1.41; 95 % CI 1.20–1.66; p < 0.0001), although substantial heterogeneity was present (I² = 72.8 %, τ² = 0.054). A random-effects synthesis attenuated the estimate (RR = 1.36; 95 % CI 1.00–1.86; p = 0.048). VOC significantly improved renal response (common-effect RR = 1.78; 95 % CI 1.35–2.34; p < 0.0001) with no observed between-study heterogeneity (I² = 0 %). An indirect Bucher comparison of pooled random-effects estimates showed no statistically significant difference between TAC and VOC (log RR = –0.23; SE = 0.164); the corresponding RR was 0.79 (95 % CI 0.58–1.09).

Conclusion: Based on this meta-analysis, both calcineurin inhibitors improve short-term renal response in active lupus nephritis when added to standard care. Voclosporin shows a larger and more consistent benefit across trials (RR 1.78), whereas tacrolimus exhibits greater between-study variability. Nevertheless, the indirect Bucher comparison does not establish the clear superiority of either drug. These findings highlight the need for additional studies that directly compare calcineurin inhibitors, with particular emphasis on their relative efficacy, safety, and patient adherence.

Supporting image 1Forest plot for Tacrolimus trials

Supporting image 2Forest plot Voclosporin trials


Disclosures: U. Zala: None; R. Patel: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Zala U, Patel R. Tacrolimus Versus Voclosporin for Active Lupus Nephritis: A Comparative Meta-analysis of Renal Response [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/tacrolimus-versus-voclosporin-for-active-lupus-nephritis-a-comparative-meta-analysis-of-renal-response/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/tacrolimus-versus-voclosporin-for-active-lupus-nephritis-a-comparative-meta-analysis-of-renal-response/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology