ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0699

T Cell Subset Analysis in Patients with Large-Vessel Vasculitis

Rebecca Kuan1, Christopher Redmond1, McKella Sylvester2, Mary Maclean1, Francoise Meylan1, Marcela Ferrada1, Kaitlin Quinn1 and Peter Grayson3, 1National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, 2Colgate University, Bethesda, MD, 3National Institutes of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Chevy Chase, MD

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: giant cell arteritis, T Cell, Takayasu.s arteritis, TH17 Cells, Vasculitis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 12, 2023

Title: (0691–0721) Vasculitis – Non-ANCA-Associated & Related Disorders Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Large-vessel vasculitis (LVV) is characterized by granulomatous inflammation of the aorta and its major branches. The two major forms are giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu’s arteritis (TAK). Clinical manifestations and angiographic patterns of diseases can be similar between these diseases; however, GCA exclusively affects older people while TAK is frequently a disease of the young. Few studies directly compare circulating immune cell subsets between TAK and GCA. Some studies have independently shown involvement of Treg, Th1, and Th17 subsets in GCA and TAK. The study objectives were to profile human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) using spectral flow cytometry and directly compare CD4+ T helper (Th) and CD8+ cytotoxic T cell (Tc) subsets between patients with GCA and TAK.

Methods: Cryopreserved PBMCs, collected during active disease from patients with LVV enrolled in an observational cohort study and from healthy controls (HC), were profiled. A 30-color panel for spectral flow cytometry was designed. Each antibody was titrated to determine its optimal volume and then adjusted until the staining pattern was comparable between multicolor and single-color staining. The two conditions tested involved 4-6 h PBMC incubation with PMA, ionomycin, and Brefeldin A (stimulated) and in media alone (unstimulated). Treg, Th1, Th2, Th9, Th17, Tc1, Tc2, Tc9, and Tc17 subsets were defined as the proportion of CD4 or CD8 T cells expressing a key transcription factor or cytokine. Kruskal-Wallis tests were conducted to compare between groups. Spearman correlation was reported for comparisons of subset abundance and age within HC.

Results: Patients with active GCA (N=24, ages 54-88), patients with active TAK (N=27, ages 15-54), and HC (N=18, ages 14-74) were included. Statistically significant differences between TAK and GCA were only observed in Th17 and Tc17 subsets. TAK patients (median 0.69%) showed significantly higher Th17 (CD4+IL17+) compared to GCA patients (0.23%, p=0.002) but not HC (0.56%, p >0.999) (Figure 1). GCA patients (0.05%) had significantly lower Tc17 (CD8+IL17+) levels than TAK (0.11%, p=0.001) and HC (0.10%, p=0.033) (Figure 1). Neither of Th17 nor Tc17 correlated with age within the HC group (r=-0.194 and r=-0.1741 respectively). There were no significant differences between TAK and GCA for Th1 and Tc1 populations. TAK patients (31.7%) did have lower Tc1 (CD8+IFNg+) than HC (56.1%, p=0.028). The only significantly difference observed in Tregs (CD4+FOXP3+) was lower expression in GCA patients (4.99%) than HC (7.06%, p=0.004).

Conclusion: Abundance of Th17 and Tc17 subsets were greater in TAK compared to GCA with no differences in Treg, Th1, or Tc1 subsets. Differences in IL17-producing T lymphocytes may be a fundamental immunologic difference between GCA and TAK and may inform novel therapeutic strategies in these conditions. A lack of strong differences in circulating immune cell populations between TAK, GCA, and HC suggests that profiling peripheral blood may not be as informative as direct study of affected arterial tissue in these conditions.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1: Expression of (A) Th17 and (B) Tc17 subsets in PBMCs from patients with Takayasu’s arteritis (TAK), patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA), and healthy controls (HC)


Disclosures: R. Kuan: Colgate-Palmolive Company, 5; C. Redmond: None; M. Sylvester: None; M. Maclean: None; F. Meylan: None; M. Ferrada: None; K. Quinn: None; P. Grayson: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kuan R, Redmond C, Sylvester M, Maclean M, Meylan F, Ferrada M, Quinn K, Grayson P. T Cell Subset Analysis in Patients with Large-Vessel Vasculitis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/t-cell-subset-analysis-in-patients-with-large-vessel-vasculitis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/t-cell-subset-analysis-in-patients-with-large-vessel-vasculitis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology