ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 144

Sonographic Differentiation of Heel Pain: Focal Degenerative Versus Systemic Inflammatory Enthesitis

Patrick Hook1, Diana Vradii2, Maureen Dubreuil3,4, Hau Pham5 and Eugene Y. Kissin1, 1Rheumatology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 2Rheumatology, Mid Coast Hospital Medical Center, Brunswick, ME, 3Rheumatology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA, 4Rheumatology, Boston VA HealthCare System, Boston, MA, 5Podiatry, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Enthesitis, pain, Spondylarthritis, tendonitis/bursitis and ultrasound

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases: Ultrasound

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:   Plantar fasciitis and Achilles tendonitis are commonly encountered in a rheumatologic practice due to either degenerative (DG) or systemic inflammatory conditions (SYS).  While sonographic findings in both DG and SYS have been described in numerous studies, no study has systematically compared these two causes of heel pain. The aim of our study is to determine whether sonographic findings in the Achilles tendon and plantar fascia can be used to differentiate DG from SYS states.

Methods:    Patients over the age of 18 with pain at the Achilles tendon or plantar fascia presenting to the Podiatry, Dermatology or Rheumatology clinics were enrolled.  Exclusion criteria: previous heel trauma, surgery or recent corticosteroid heel injections. Medical chart review, a focused history, and a comprehensive musculoskeletal physical examination determined patient categorization as DG, SYS, or undetermined cause of heel pain. Patients’ Achilles tendons and plantar fascia were imaged with a GE Logiq e ultrasound and 12MHz linear array transducer. Doppler settings: PRF 0.8, low wall filter and Doppler gain set to maximize signal with minimal artifact.  We evaluated tendon thickness, retro-calcaneal bursal size, cortical erosions, and Doppler signal at the enthesis and at the cortical margin.  Continuous variable were compared between the degenerative and inflammatory groups using t tests, and proportions were compared using Chi squared or Fischer’s exact tests.     

Results:    Interim analysis of the first 46 patients recruited includes 20 in the SYS group and 22 in the DG group (4 undetermined). SYS group consists of 15 patients with psoriatic arthritis, 4 with non-psoriatic spondyloarthritis, and 1 with rheumatoid arthritis.  Male:female ratio was 15:5 in the SYS group, and 6:16 in the DG group. While there were no significant differences in tendon thickness between the groups (Table), both the presence of erosions (SYS 70% vs. DG 23%, p=0.002), and the presence of Doppler at the enthesis (SYS 55%, vs. DG23%, p=0.03) were significantly more common in the SYS group (Table). Surprisingly, erosion size and degree of Doppler signal did not help distinguish the groups (Table). Doppler signal at the cortical margin was not more specific to the inflammatory group than enthesis Doppler overall (Table).    

Conclusion: While there were no significant differences in tendon thickness, degenerative causes of heel enthesitis were less likely to show Doppler signal and erosive changes than systemic inflammatory enthesitis. However, erosions were seen in some heel enthesitis not associated with systemic inflammatory disease.

 


Disclosure:

P. Hook,
None;

D. Vradii,
None;

M. Dubreuil,
None;

H. Pham,
None;

E. Y. Kissin,

SonoSite Inc,

9.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/sonographic-differentiation-of-heel-pain-focal-degenerative-versus-systemic-inflammatory-enthesitis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology