ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2833

SM101, a Novel Recombinant, Soluble, Human FcγIIB Receptor, in the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Results of a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Multicenter Study

Sascha Tillmanns1, Claudia Kolligs1, David P. D'Cruz2, Andrea Doria3, Eric Hachulla4, Reinhard E. Voll5, Michael Tansey1 and Klaus Schollmeier6, 1Medical/Clinical, SuppreMol GmbH, Martinsried, Germany, 2Louise Coote Lupus Unit, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom, 3Department of Medicine - DIMED, University of Padova, Padova, Italy, 4Medicine Interne et Oncologie Medicale Centre Pole, Lille University, Lille, France, 5Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology & Centre of Chronic Immunodeficiency, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany, 6SuppreMol GmbH, Martinsried, Germany

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologic agents, clinical trials and treatment, Lupus, SLE

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects and Treatment: Novel Therapies for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose : SM101, which represents the human soluble non-glycosylated version of the Fcγ receptor IIB, binds to the Fc part of autoimmune complexes and inhibits the binding of immune complexes to cell-standing Fcg receptors. It has undergone preclinical and clinical safety and efficacy investigation, with evidence of efficacy in primary immune thrombocytopenia. The mode of action could make SM101 a safe and effective treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods: The objectives of this phase IIa randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group study were to evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of placebo and 2 doses of SM101 (6mg/kg and 12mg/kg), randomised 1:2:2, in patients with SLE. The main inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of SLE, evidence of serological activity (high anti-dsDNA activity or low C3), and a SELENA-SLEDAI score ≥ 6 points, with stratification to include patients with lupus nephritis (LN). Concomitant immunosuppressive therapy with corticosteroids, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or azathioprine and adjuvant SLE medication were allowed at constant doses during the study. Eligible patients received an infusion of study drug once a week for the first 4 weeks; study duration was 24 weeks. Data were reviewed regularly by an independent safety monitoring board. Response was measured at 24 weeks according to the SLE Responder Index (combination of SELENA-SLEDAI response ≥ 4 points, no BILAG A or 2 x B flares and no PGA score worsening).

Results: Fifty one eligible patients, 14 with LN, from 8 European countries and Australia, were randomized and received at least one dose of active investigational drug or placebo. Concomitant medications were corticosteroids (96% of patients), MMF (45%), azathioprine (20%) or combinations thereof. Patient numbers per group and response rates are shown in Table 1. The SLE Responder Index response rate was twice as high in the SM101-treated patients compared with placebo, and response in patients with LN was proportionately greater. The response rate on SM101 remains the same after exclusion of 15 patients who received rescue medication. The main clinical drivers for response were improvement in arthritis and in skin eruption (present in 75% and 50% patients respectively) according to the BILAG scale. Both worsened or remained unchanged in placebo patients; in SM101-treated patients improvement or resolution occurred in 57% with arthritis and 45% with skin eruption. No safety signals which could be attributed specifically to SM101 were reported, and no serious adverse events were probably or possibly related to the drug. No anti-drug antibodies were detected.

Conclusion: The encouraging results of this early phase study indicate that the novel biological SM101 warrants further investigation as a treatment for patients with SLE, including patients with LN.

Table 1. Percentage of Patients Responding According to the SLE Responder Index and its Components

 

ALL PATIENTS

PATIENTS WITH LN

 

Placebo

(n=11)

6mg/kg

(n=22)

12mg/kg

(n=18)

Placebo

(n=3)

6mg/kg

(n=6)

12mg/kg

(n=5)

  SLE

  Responder Index

18%

36%

39%

0%

50%

60%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  SELENA-SLEDAI

  Reduction ≥ 4 Points

27%

41%

50%

0%

50%

80%

  SELENA-SLEDAI

  Reduction ≥ 6 Points

9%

14%

28%

0%

17%

60%

  BILAG

  No Worsening

91%

77%

100%

100%

83%

80%

  PGA

  No Worsening

55%

77%

89%

67%

67%

80%


Disclosure:

S. Tillmanns,

SuppreMol GmbH,

3;

C. Kolligs,

SuppreMol GmbH,

3;

D. P. D’Cruz,

Investigator,

5;

A. Doria,

Investigator,

5;

E. Hachulla,

Investigator,

5;

R. E. Voll,

Investigator,

5;

M. Tansey,

SuppreMol GmbH,

3;

K. Schollmeier,

SuppreMol GmbH,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/sm101-a-novel-recombinant-soluble-human-fc%ce%b3iib-receptor-in-the-treatment-of-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-results-of-a-double-blind-placebo-controlled-multicenter-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology