ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1188

Sifting Through Complexity in a Methodological Manner: Identifying Key Items in Teaching Lupus to Medical Students Through Consensus

Julie Thomas1, Michael Battistone2, Kyle Register1 and Andrea Barker2, 1University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 2Salt Lake City VA, Salt Lake City, UT

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Education, education, medical, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 8, 2021

Title: Professional Education Poster (1170–1195)

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Creating a curriculum for teaching lupus to medical students is a challenge given the complexities and nuances of this systemic disease. Because lupus spans multiple complex systems, educators outside of rheumatology hold stake in determining what elements of lupus a graduating medical student should be familiar with; this adds further complexity to curricular design. Unfortunately, the literature offers little guidance. The aim of this study is to use consensus methodology involving various stakeholders to identify key lupus curricular items that medical students should learn about during their four year education.

Methods: 86 faculty and housestaff members from the University of Utah (UU) were invited to participate in a 3 step Delphi consensus process. Housestaff members included 3 Rheumatology fellows and 3 Internal Medicine chief residents. Step 1 involved reviewing the 21 current items in the UU medical school curriculum and requesting suggestions for additional items. In step 2, each participant rated every item’s importance to be included in the medical school curriculum using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all important; 5 = extremely important). In the 3rd step, participants were given the group’s mean and mode rating for each item, reminded of their own initial rating, and asked to make a final 5-point rating. Individual responses to each step remained anonymous. After the final step, items rated ≥4 (“very important” or “extremely important”) by at least 80% of participants were retained; these identified items defined the set of lupus curricular elements representing the consensus of the group.

Results: 44 participants accepted the invitation to join our consensus project (51%); 31 participants completed all steps (37% of invited members, 70% of accepted participants). The majority were rheumatologists (16, 52%), 4 participants were from internal medicine, and 11 participants were medical school educators (6 of these medical educators also had internal medicine backgrounds).

In step 1, 61 items were added as suggestions to the curriculum leading to a total of 82 items to be rated. The consensus process eliminated 50 items, leaving 32 in the final list of identified important key teaching elements for lupus (see Table 1). In a post-hoc analysis of ratings provided by rheumatologists within the larger consensus group, 9 additional elements were identified though these did not meet total group consensus (see Table 2).

Conclusion: Using a systematic consensus exercise, a diverse group of educators participating in the lupus consensus project identified key teaching items to prioritize during medical school education. The next steps will include developing learning objectives mapped to these identified items in the development of curriculum to educate medical students about lupus.

Table 1: List of Identified Key Items meeting >80% Total Group Consensus

Table 2: List of Additional Key Items recommended by >80% Rheumatologists within Total Consensus Group


Disclosures: J. Thomas, None; M. Battistone, None; K. Register, None; A. Barker, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Thomas J, Battistone M, Register K, Barker A. Sifting Through Complexity in a Methodological Manner: Identifying Key Items in Teaching Lupus to Medical Students Through Consensus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/sifting-through-complexity-in-a-methodological-manner-identifying-key-items-in-teaching-lupus-to-medical-students-through-consensus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/sifting-through-complexity-in-a-methodological-manner-identifying-key-items-in-teaching-lupus-to-medical-students-through-consensus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology