ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1932

Shared Decision Making In Early Knee Osteoarthritis: Perspectives Of Older Adults With Overweight and Obesity and Health Care Providers

Alicia Zbehlik1,2, Mary Meinke3 and Stephen Bartels4, 1Rheumatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, 2The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, The Dartmouth Centers for Health and Aging, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH, 3The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH, 4The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, The Dartmouth Centers for Health and Aging, Lebanon, NH

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Elderly, Knee, obesity, osteoarthritis and shared dicision making

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Health Services Research, Quality Measures and Quality of Care - Innovations in Health Care Delivery

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is the most common form of mobility disability in the United States yet those at highest risk—older adults with overweight and obesity— continue to have unmet needs regarding their KOA care.  People with early KOA receive arthroscopic surgery proven to have no benefit and receive little information regarding exercise and weight loss that may modify the course of their disease.  Although shared decision making (SDM) and decision aids (DAs) are effective strategies to reduce unnecessary procedures by guiding patients to make informed decisions incorporating their personal values, SDM and DAs are not widely used. To our knowledge, studies have not simultaneously compared patient and provider preferences of multiple decision making tools in early KOA.  Our study examines three DAs for early KOA: (1) Osteoarthritis Option Grids, (2) the “Managing Early-Stage Knee Osteoarthritis” booklet, and (3) “What are my options for managing hip or knee osteoarthritis?: A stepped decision aid.”  Evaluating DA preferences of both patients and providers will serve as a first step to build and implement a system of effective early KOA care that supports lifestyle modification for older adults who are overweight or obese.

Methods: This on-going study employs a cross-sectional, qualitative design using focus groups of patients and providers.  We recruit English-speaking participants by flier, word of mouth, and referral. The patient group (n=35) inclusion criteria are: a) Body Mass Index =/>25 kg/m2; b) age =/> 60 years, and; c) the diagnosis of KOA or a positive screen for knee OA on The Knee and Hip OA Screening Questionnaire. The provider group (n=35) is recruited through word of mouth and by email invitation. Providers that care for adults with OA in an academic or community setting are included. Plan is for five focus groups per target population, or until thematic saturation is reached. Each group uses a semi-structured format and lasts 60 to 90 minutes. The taped sessions are de-identified by a transcriptionist.  Transcripts are coded and for the generation of themes by two researchers using a qualitative data analysis software program.

Results: Preliminary results from patient focus groups conducted during May 2013 show emerging themes include costs of care, lack of information about treatment options, and challenges in communicating with providers. Patients demonstrated an interest in SDM and DAs, but had little prior exposure to the tools. They also commented on the granularity and visual presentation of evidence, the lack of details regarding exercise options available, and the logistics of distributing DAs.  Participants were enthusiastic about shared medical appointments. Patients gravitated towards the booklet format, but appreciated the unique characteristics of all the decision aids. They felt the DA’s would be useful before, during, and after a clinic appointment and would assist with provider communication.

Conclusion: Preliminary results indicate that patients respond to a variety of early KOA decision aids and are eager to engage providers in shared decision making.  Patients are concerned about costs of care, a theme not incorporated into any of the decision aids.


Disclosure:

A. Zbehlik,
None;

M. Meinke,
None;

S. Bartels,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/shared-decision-making-in-early-knee-osteoarthritis-perspectives-of-older-adults-with-overweight-and-obesity-and-health-care-providers/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology