ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1946

Shaping the Future of the National Musculoskeletal (MSK) Triage Initiative: Exploring the Impact of a Hybrid Model (Virtual and Face to Face) of MSK Triage

Julie Sugrue, Scott Murphy, Mark Kingston, paula Wallace, Catriona O'Dwyer, colum Moloney, Olivia McKenna, Finbarr Condon and Sean McKenna, Health Service Executive, Limerick, Limerick, Ireland

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Access to care, Health Services Research, Musculoskeletal Examination, Osteoarthritis, physical therapy

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 18, 2024

Title: Health Services Research – ACR/ARP Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) are the leading contributor of disability worldwide (de Thurah et al 2022). The National Musculoskeletal (MSK) Triage Initiative, ensures patients on Rheumatology and Orthopaedic waiting lists, who are unlikely to require specialist consultant care, are triaged by Clinical Specialist Physiotherapists.

The Wold Health Organisation (WHO) advises the development and implementation of eHealth solutions to optimise patient access (2017). Virtual consultations (VC) were used extensively during COVID-19, but have since reverted to traditional face to face (F2F) or Hybrid (VC +/- F2F) models, with limited evaluation of these to date. Hence the aim of this study was to review the impact of a Hybrid Model (VC +/- F2F) for MSK Triage. 

Methods: Observational retrospective study of MSK Triage data over a 12 month period, using descriptive statistics to summarise and present findings. Ethical approval was received.

Results: A total of 2,373 New Patient (NP) consultations were managed by the MSK team, with almost two-thirds (63.59%, n=1509) screened and scheduled for virtual clinic (VC). Remaining patients (36.41%, n=864) were scheduled for F2F clinics, due to referral information (e.g. motor or sensory loss, language barriers, or lack of contact details to enable VC).   

Of those scheduled for VC, 47.05% (n=710), including patients who did not attend (DNA, n=199), were discharged after initial VC appointment. Almost half (49.23%, n=743) were listed for F2F Review (RV), 2.45% (n=37) were listed for Virtual RV, and 1.35% were referred for Consultant RV (n=19). New patient DNA rates were lower for VC (13.18%, n=199) than F2F clinics (17.93%, n=155).

Outcomes for patients who received their F2F RV appointment (n=468) show that 56.19% (n=263) were subsequently discharged following that appointment. This includes patients who DNA (n=75). Combining this with discharges from VC NP, a discharge rate of (46.32%, n=699) was captured for the Hybrid Model, which is marginally higher than the discharge rate of 44.79% for the traditional F2F model.

Furthermore, the adoption of Hybrid MSK Triage clinics allowed for an increase in NP appointment capacity, facilitating maximum utilisation of clinical resources, and overcoming potential limitations posed by lack of physical clinical space. This has facilitated a reduction in waiting times for MSK triage from 188 weeks to 32 weeks over the one year period. This has also optimised the use of MSK Clinic space at Consultant clinics for more complex patients who may require consultant RV or discussion on the same day.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates merit in using a Hybrid model for MSK Triage, with associated reduction in patient waiting times from more than 3 years to 32 weeks over the one year period, with reduced DNA rates, and no negative impact on patient discharge rates.

Separate studies to explore patient and clinician feedback have been presented elsewhere and reported positive findings (e.g. patients citing benefit in reduced unnecessary hospital journeys of up to 250km).

Further investigation is planned to explore which MSK conditions and other patient parameters may impact the efficiency of Hybrid models for the delivery of MSK Services.


Disclosures: J. Sugrue: None; S. Murphy: None; M. Kingston: None; p. Wallace: None; C. O'Dwyer: None; c. Moloney: None; O. McKenna: None; F. Condon: None; S. McKenna: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Sugrue J, Murphy S, Kingston M, Wallace p, O'Dwyer C, Moloney c, McKenna O, Condon F, McKenna S. Shaping the Future of the National Musculoskeletal (MSK) Triage Initiative: Exploring the Impact of a Hybrid Model (Virtual and Face to Face) of MSK Triage [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/shaping-the-future-of-the-national-musculoskeletal-msk-triage-initiative-exploring-the-impact-of-a-hybrid-model-virtual-and-face-to-face-of-msk-triage/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/shaping-the-future-of-the-national-musculoskeletal-msk-triage-initiative-exploring-the-impact-of-a-hybrid-model-virtual-and-face-to-face-of-msk-triage/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology