ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2111

Self-reported Methotrexate Adherence Underestimates Biochemical Adherence: Results from the Methotrexate Use Improvement in Rheumatoid Arthritis Using Biomarker Feedback Trial

James Bluett1, Kimme Hyrich2, Brian Keevil3, Patty Doran4 and Anne Barton5, 1University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, 2Versus Arthritis Centre for Epidemiology, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, 3Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom, 4School of Social Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, 5Versus Arthritis Centre for Genetics and Genomics, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Biomarkers, clinical trial, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), psychosocial factors, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Title: (2095–2140) RA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, and Outcomes Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Methotrexate (MTX) adherence is suboptimal and is associated with disease flare, DAS-28 response, radiographic damage and healthcare costs. Adherence can be measured using self-reported questionnaires such as the validated Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5). Often the prescriber is blinded to patient non-adherence and self-reported adherence may be an underestimate. Our group has previously developed a sensitive biochemical assay for the detection of MTX adherence, The Methotrexate use Improvement in Rheumatoid Arthritis using Biomarker Feedback (MIRA) is a feasibility trial designed to assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of MTX biochemical adherence biofeedback. Here we investigate the agreement between self-reported and biochemical adherence.

Methods: MIRA is a prospective multi-centre randomised controlled trial investigating the feasibility of a fully powered randomised controlled trial to examine if a biochemical adherence guided intervention is superior to standard clinical care in RA patients. All analyses are exploratory in nature. RA patients prescribed oral MTX for ≥ two years were randomised 1:1 to receive biochemical adherence biofeedback or control (figure 1). Clinico-demographics, biochemical MTX adherence, MARS-5 and DAS-28 were measured at baseline and three months. Self-reported MARS-5 adherence was dichotomised and agreement with biochemical adherence analysed using Cohen’s Kappa.

Results: 57 participants were recruited, withdrawal rate was 14% and reasons given were intercurrent illness, lost contact, withdrawn consent and one patient died during follow-up leaving full outcome data available for 49 participants. Baseline clinico-demographics were similar in control and intervention cohorts (Table 1).

Biochemical adherence worsened in the control cohort and improved in the intervention cohort (83 to 70%, 85 to 92% respectively) whilst change in DAS(CRP)-28 worsened in the control cohort and improved in the intervention cohort (-0.04 STD 1.26 and 0.38 STD 0.78 respectively). Self-reported and biochemical adherence demonstrated fair agreement (κ=0.24) at baseline but poor (κ=0.09) at follow-up (Table 2).

Conclusion: The MIRA trial has shown early evidence of biofeedback improving MTX biochemical adherence and DAS-28 compared to control. Poor agreement between self-reported and biochemical adherence suggests biochemical adherence may be a more clinically useful measure of adherence.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1. Trial Flow Chart

Supporting image 2

Table 1. Baseline clinico-demographics.

Supporting image 3

Table 2. Biochemical and self-reported adherence at baseline and follow-up


Disclosures: J. Bluett: Fresenius Kabi, 12, Travel/conference fees, Pfizer, 5; K. Hyrich: Abbvie, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 5, Pfizer, 5; B. Keevil: None; P. Doran: None; A. Barton: Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 5, Pfizer, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Bluett J, Hyrich K, Keevil B, Doran P, Barton A. Self-reported Methotrexate Adherence Underestimates Biochemical Adherence: Results from the Methotrexate Use Improvement in Rheumatoid Arthritis Using Biomarker Feedback Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/self-reported-methotrexate-adherence-underestimates-biochemical-adherence-results-from-the-methotrexate-use-improvement-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-using-biomarker-feedback-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/self-reported-methotrexate-adherence-underestimates-biochemical-adherence-results-from-the-methotrexate-use-improvement-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-using-biomarker-feedback-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology