ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2012

Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Pegloticase Administered with a Shorter Infusion Duration in Subjects with Uncontrolled Gout Receiving Methotrexate: Primary Findings of the AGILE Open-label Trial

Orrin Troum1, John Botson2, Fang Fang3, Katie Obermeyer3, Supra Verma3 and Brian LaMoreaux4, 1Providence Health Care/Doctor's of St John's (MDSJ) Santa Monica, CA, Santa Monica, CA, 2Orthopedic Physicians Alaska, Anchorage, AK, 3Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 4Amgen, Inc., Deerfield, IL

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Biologicals, clinical trial, gout, Uric Acid, Urate

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 18, 2024

Title: Metabolic & Crystal Arthropathies – Basic & Clinical Science Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Pegloticase, infused every 2 weeks over ≥2 hrs, lowers serum urate (SU) in patients with refractory gout. Decreasing infusion time is expected to improve patient treatment experience. Methotrexate (MTX) is recommended as co-therapy to pegloticase1 to decrease pegloticase immunogenicity, subsequently increasing SU-lowering response rate and decreasing infusion reaction (IR) risk.2 Here, we report primary findings of the AGILE trial (NCT04511702) that examined pegloticase+MTX safety/efficacy with decreased pegloticase infusion time.

Methods: This Phase 4, multicenter, open label study included patients with uncontrolled gout (SU ≥6 mg/dL, oral urate-lowering therapy intolerance/inefficacy, and ≥1 of: ≥1 tophus, ≥2 gout flares/yr, or gouty arthritis). Key exclusion criteria were MTX contraindication, serious bacterial infection, G6PD deficiency, eGFR < 40 ml/min/1.73 m2, and elevated liver function tests. Eligible patients underwent a 4-week oral MTX run-in (15 mg/wk with 1 mg/d folic acid) followed by 24 weeks of pegloticase+MTX treatment (Day 1, first infusion). Initial cohorts were sequentially enrolled to receive 60-, 45-, or 30-min infusions to determine optimal duration for larger enrollment (Figure). The primary endpoint was the pegloticase+MTX IR rate (including anaphylaxis [AR]) of the most desirable infusion duration (110 patients planned). Key secondary endpoints were SU-lowering response rate during Month 6 (SU < 6 mg/dL for ≥80% of Weeks 20-24) and rate of pegloticase discontinuation due to IR, AR, or SU-response loss (2 consecutive SU >6 mg/dL after Week 2). Analyses included patients who received ≥1 pegloticase infusion (modified intent-to-treat [mITT]).

Results: Initial cohort enrollment proceeded from 60- to 45- to 30-min infusions. IR rate was highest in the 30-min cohort (12.9% [8/62]), lowest in the 45- and 60-min cohorts (both 0% [N=13, 10]). Out of caution, 60-min was chosen for further investigation. 116 patients (included initial 10 patients) made up the mITT, receiving 60-min infusions (90% men, mean [±SD] age: 55.2±11.3 yrs, BMI: 33.6±6.3 kg/m2, eGFR: 76.5±19.4 ml/min/1.73m2; 12.0±10.4 yr gout history, 66% had tophi, 7.0±7.1 flares in prior year, SU: 8.7±1.7 mg/dL). IR rate was 6.0% (95%CI: 2.5-12.0%; 7/116) in the 60-min group (including AR in 2 patients [1.7%]). The primary endpoint was met as the upper 95% CI bound for IR rate was < 13% (a pre-specified threshold) and similar to the 4.2% (including AR in 1.0%) in a prior pegloticase+MTX registrational trial with 120-min infusions (MIRROR RCT).2 SU-response rate during Month 6 (67.2% [95%CI: 57.9-75.7%] vs. 74.0%1) and overall safety profile were also similar.

Conclusion: Pegloticase treatment over 6-12 months markedly improves uncontrolled gout signs/symptoms2,3 and patient quality of life.4 However, biweekly 2-hr infusions can be challenging for patients. Safety/efficacy data from the AGILE trial, support shortening infusion time to 60-min to minimize patient treatment burden.

 References
1. Pegloticase [package insert], Horizon Therapeutics USA, 2022
2. Botson JK et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2023;75:293-304

3. Botson JK et al. ACR Open Rheumatol 2023;5:407-18
4. Botson J et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82(suppl 1):518

Supporting image 1

Figure. Study design. *cohort enrolled if no safety concerns from prior cohort. MTX, methotrexate.

Supporting image 2


Disclosures: O. Troum: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 5, Eli Lilly, 6, Genentech, 6, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 6, Novartis, 2, 5, Roche, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5; J. Botson: AbbVie/Abbott, 6, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, 10, Eli Lilly, 6, Novartis, 6; F. Fang: None; K. Obermeyer: Amgen, Inc., 3, 12, Stockholder; S. Verma: Amgen, 3, 12, Stockholder; B. LaMoreaux: Amgen, Inc., 3, 12, Stockholder.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Troum O, Botson J, Fang F, Obermeyer K, Verma S, LaMoreaux B. Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Pegloticase Administered with a Shorter Infusion Duration in Subjects with Uncontrolled Gout Receiving Methotrexate: Primary Findings of the AGILE Open-label Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-tolerability-and-efficacy-of-pegloticase-administered-with-a-shorter-infusion-duration-in-subjects-with-uncontrolled-gout-receiving-methotrexate-primary-findings-of-the-agile-open-label-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-tolerability-and-efficacy-of-pegloticase-administered-with-a-shorter-infusion-duration-in-subjects-with-uncontrolled-gout-receiving-methotrexate-primary-findings-of-the-agile-open-label-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology