ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0237

Safety Profile of Upadacitinib up to 3 Years of Exposure in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Stanley Cohen1, Ronald F Van Vollenhoven2, Jeffrey Curtis3, Leonard Calabrese4, Cristiano AF Zerbini5, Yoshiya Tanaka6, Louis Bessette7, Casey Schlacher8, Tim Shaw9, John Liu9, Jeffrey Enejosa9, Yanna Song10 and Gerd Burmester11, 1Metroplex Clinical Research Center, Dallas, TX, 2Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center ARC, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 3Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 4Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 5Centro Paulista de Investigacao Clinica (CEPIC), Sao Paulo, Brazil, 6The First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan, 7Laval University, Quebec, Canada, 8AbbVie Inc., Lake Forest, IL, 9AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, 10AbbVie Inc., North Chicago,, IL, 11Charité University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: clinical trial, immunology, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Friday, November 6, 2020

Title: RA – Treatments Poster I: RA Treatments & Their Safety

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The safety and efficacy of upadacitinib (UPA), an oral JAK inhibitor, was evaluated in the phase 3 SELECT clinical program, which included 5 randomized, double-blind, controlled trials across a spectrum of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients (pts)1-5. We describe the long-term integrated safety profile of UPA relative to active comparators in pts with RA treated in the SELECT program up to a cut-off date of 30 June 2019.

Methods: Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs: AE onset ≥first dose and ≤30 days after last dose) were summarized for the following: methotrexate (MTX, 1 trial, mean exposure 76 wks); adalimumab (ADA, 1 trial, mean exposure 69 wks); pooled UPA 15 mg (5 trials, mean exposure 90 wks); pooled UPA 30 mg (4 trials, mean exposure 100 wks). TEAEs are reported as exposure-adjusted event rates (EAERs; events/100 patient years [E/100PYs]).

Results: 3833 pts received ≥1 dose of UPA 15 mg [n=2629, 4565.8 PYs] or 30 mg [n=1204, 2309.7 PYs] QD, with no option to switch doses. More than half of pts received UPA for ≥96 wks (median: UPA 15, 101.9 wks; UPA 30: 111.7 wks). The EAERs of overall SAEs and AEs leading to discontinuation on UPA 15 mg were comparable to MTX and ADA; rates on UPA 30 mg were numerically higher than UPA 15 mg (Table). The most common AEs (≥5 E/100 PYs) reported with UPA 15 mg were upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), nasopharyngitis, urinary tract infection (UTI), bronchitis, increased CPK, and increased ALT. For UPA 30 mg, the most common AEs reported were URTI, UTI, increased CPK, nasopharyngitis, bacterial bronchitis, and herpes zoster (HZ). Overall rates of serious infections and opportunistic infections were comparable between UPA 15 mg, MTX, and ADA groups but were higher on UPA 30 mg (Figure). Rates of HZ were higher in both UPA groups (30 mg higher than 15 mg) vs MTX and ADA. The majority of HZ cases were non-serious (96%) and involved a single dermatome (74%). Rates of VTE were comparable across treatment groups (0.3-0.5/100 PYs), as were rates of adjudicated MACE and malignancies (excluding NMSC). Rates of NMSC in UPA 15 mg and ADA were similar, with numerically higher rates on UPA 30 mg. SMR analysis demonstrated that the number of deaths in pts with RA exposed to UPA was not higher than what would be expected for the general population.

Conclusion: Through long-term follow-up, the integrated safety profile of UPA remained consistent with previous analyses, with no new signals identified.

REFERENCES:
                  1. Burmester, et al. Lancet 2018;391:2503-12.
                  2. Genovese, et al. Lancet 2018;391:2513-24.
                  3. Smolen, et al. Lancet 2019;393:2303-11.
                  4. Fleischmann, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019;71:1788-1800.
                  5. van Vollenhoven, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2018;70(Suppl 10).
                      Original abs: Ann Rheum Dis. 2020; 79(S1):315.


Disclosure: S. Cohen, Amgen Inc, 1, 2, AbbVie, 1, 2, Pfizer, 1, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 1, 2, Sandoz, 1, 2, Gilead, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5; R. Van Vollenhoven, AbbVie, 1, 2, Arthrogen, 1, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1, 2, GlaxoSmithKline, 1, 2, Lilly, 1, 2, Pfizer, 1, 2, UCB, 1, 2, Astra Zeneca, 1, Biotest, 1, Celgene, 1, Janssen, 1, Medac, 1, Merck & Co, 1, Novartis, 1, Roche, 1; J. Curtis, AbbVie, 1, 2, Amgen, 1, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1, 2, Corrona, 1, 2, Crescendo, 1, 2, Janssen, 1, 2, Pfizer, 1, 2, Sanofi, 1, 2, UCB, 1, 2; L. Calabrese, AbbVie, 1, 2, GlaxoSmithKline, 1, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1, Genentech, 1, 2, Janssen, 1, 2, Novartis, 1, 2, Sanofi, 1, Horizon, 1, Crescendo, 1, Gilead, 1; C. Zerbini, Amgen, 1, GlaxoSmithKline, 1, Lilly, 1, Merck & Co, 1, 2, Novartis, 1, Pfizer, 2, 5, Sanofi, 1, 2, Servier, 1, Roche, 1; Y. Tanaka, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8, Sanofi, 2, 5, 8, Asahi-kasei, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, 5, 8, Astellas, 2, 5, 8, Chugai, 2, 5, 8, Daiichi-Sankyo, 2, 5, 8, Eisai, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 2, 5, 8, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Takeda, 2, 5, 8, YL Biologics, 2, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 8; L. Bessette, Amgen, 1, 2, 3, BMS, 1, 2, 3, Janssen, 1, 2, 3, UCB, 1, 2, 3, AbbVie, 1, 2, 3, Pfizer, 1, 2, 3, Merck, 1, 2, 3, Celgene, 1, 2, 3, Sanofi, 1, 2, 3, Lilly, 1, 2, 3, Novartis, 1, 2, 3, Gilead, 2, 6, 8; C. Schlacher, AbbVie, 1, 2; T. Shaw, AbbVie, 1, 2; J. Liu, AbbVie Inc., 1, 2; J. Enejosa, AbbVie, 1, 2; Y. Song, AbbVie, 1, 2; G. Burmester, AbbVie, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, Celgene, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Cohen S, Van Vollenhoven R, Curtis J, Calabrese L, Zerbini C, Tanaka Y, Bessette L, Schlacher C, Shaw T, Liu J, Enejosa J, Song Y, Burmester G. Safety Profile of Upadacitinib up to 3 Years of Exposure in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-profile-of-upadacitinib-up-to-3-years-of-exposure-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-profile-of-upadacitinib-up-to-3-years-of-exposure-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology