ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 865

Safety and Efficacy of Lenabasum at 21 Months in an Open-Label Extension of a Phase 2 Study in Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis Subjects

Robert Spiera1, Laura Hummers 2, Lorinda Chung 3, Tracy Frech 4, Robyn Domsic 5, Vivien Hsu 6, Daniel Furst 7, Jessica Gordon 1, Madeline Myers 8, Robert W Simms 9, Elizabeth Lee 10, Scott Constantine 10, Nancy Dgetluck 10, Bradley Bloom 10 and Barbara White 10, 1Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 2Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Baltimore, MD, USA, Baltimore, MD, 3Stanford, Palo Alto, Palo Alto, CA, 4Division of Rheumatology, University of Utah and Salt Lake VAMC, Salt Lake City, UT, 5University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 6Rutgers- RWJ Medical School, SOUTH PLAINFIELD, NJ, 7University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 8University of Texas, Houston, Houston, TX, 9Boston University, Boston, MA, 10Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Norwood, MA

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: cannabinoid and patient-reported outcome measures, clinical trials, Skin fibrosis, Systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: 3S084: Systemic Sclerosis & Related Disorder – Clinical I: Therapeutics & Outcomes (863–868)

Session Type: ACR Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: Lenabasum is a synthetic, non-immunosuppressive, selective cannabinoid receptor type 2 agonist that activates resolution of innate immune responses and limits fibrosis in animal models of SSc. Lenabasum had acceptable safety and tolerability, and improved efficacy outcomes in the 16-week, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled Part A of Phase 2 trial JBT101-SSc-001 (NCT02465437) in dcSSc subjects.  The purpose of this study is to provide long-term open-label safety and efficacy data in study JBT101-SSc-001.

Methods: Subjects who completed Part A were eligible to receive oral lenabasum 20 mg BID in an open-label extension (OLE) that assessed safety and efficacy at 4 weeks, then every 8 weeks.

Results:  

36/38 (95%) eligible subjects enrolled in the OLE. At data cut in March 2019, 29/36 (81%) patients remained in the OLE and had completed at least Week 92 in the study. Four subjects withdrew consent, 2 subjects withdrew due to AEs unrelated to lenabasum (tendonitis and scleroderma renal crisis), and 1 subject withdrew for other reasons. At Week 92, 35 (97%) subjects experienced at least 1 AE, with 249 total AEs. Seven (19%) subjects had ≥ 1 AE considered related to lenabasum in the OLE and 3 had AEs judged to be probably or definitely related to lenabasum: 1 had mild fatigue, 1 had a moderate skin ulcer and moderate lymph node pain, and 1 had mild disturbance in attention and mild lethargy and moderate feeling abnormal. Most subjects experienced AEs that were mild (n = 6, 17%) to moderate (n = 23, 64%) in maximum severity.  Six (17%) had severe AEs and 1 (3%) had a life-threating AE of renal crisis associated with high-dose steroids. AEs in ≥ 10% of subjects were: upper respiratory tract infection (n = 11, 31%); skin ulcer, urinary tract infection, and arthralgia (each n = 6, 17%); and diarrhea, nasopharyngitis, and cough (each n = 4, 11%).  Dizziness and fatigue occurred in 3 (8.3%) subjects each.

Improvement was seen in multiple physician- and patient-reported efficacy outcomes; selected outcomes are shown in Figure 1.  Compared to study start, the CRISS median score (primary efficacy outcome) was 0.96 (0.43 IQR) at Week 92 and mRSS declined by mean (SD) = -10.3 (7.2) points.  Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, Physician Global Assessment, Patient Global Assessment, skin symptoms, itch, and multiple PROMIS-29 domains also improved.  FVC % predicted decreased 3.2% from study start.

Conclusion: Lenabasum continues to have a favorable safety and tolerability profile in the OLE of the Phase 2 trial JBT101-SSc-001 with no serious AEs or study discontinuations related to lenabasum.  Efficacy outcomes show stable improvement from about 1 year in the OLE or continued improvement in some cases.  Background therapy, natural history of the disease, and open-label dosing limit what can be definitely contributed to lenabasum.


Disclosure: R. Spiera, Actelion, BIPI, 2, Chemocentryx, 2, 5, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, 2, Cytori, 2, EMD Serono, Evidera, Formation Biologics, 2, Genentech, Genentech/Roche, 2, 5, Glaxosmithkline, 2, 5, InflaRx, InterMune, Janssen, 5, Litmus, Novartis, PPD/GSK, Sanofi, 2, 5; L. Hummers, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, 5, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, 5, Corbus, 2, Corbus Pharmacueticals, 2, CSL Behring, 5, Cumberland, 2, Cumberland Pharmaceuticals, 2, Cytori, 2, Cytori Therapeutics, 2, GlaxoSmithKline, 2; L. Chung, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 5, Eicos, 5, Reata, 5, Mitsubishi Tanabe, 5, BMS, 5; T. Frech, None; R. Domsic, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 5, Eicos, 5, EICOS Sciences Inc, 5; V. Hsu, None; D. Furst, Actelion, 2, 5, Actelion Pharmaceuticals, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, BMS, 2, 5, CME, 5, 8, Corbus, 2, 5, Galapagos, 2, 5, Galapogos Novartis, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, GSK, 2, 5, NIH, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Roche/Genentech, 2, 5, Sanofi, 2, 5; J. Gordon, Corbus, 2, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, 2, Cumberland, 2, Cumberland Pharmaceuticals, 2, Elcos, 2; M. Myers, None; R. Simms, None; E. Lee, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, 3; S. Constantine, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, 1, 3, 4; N. Dgetluck, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, 3, 4; B. Bloom, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, 3, 4; B. White, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, 1, 3, 4, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Spiera R, Hummers L, Chung L, Frech T, Domsic R, Hsu V, Furst D, Gordon J, Myers M, Simms R, Lee E, Constantine S, Dgetluck N, Bloom B, White B. Safety and Efficacy of Lenabasum at 21 Months in an Open-Label Extension of a Phase 2 Study in Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis Subjects [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-and-efficacy-of-lenabasum-at-21-months-in-an-open-label-extension-of-a-phase-2-study-in-diffuse-cutaneous-systemic-sclerosis-subjects/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-and-efficacy-of-lenabasum-at-21-months-in-an-open-label-extension-of-a-phase-2-study-in-diffuse-cutaneous-systemic-sclerosis-subjects/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology