ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2246

Safety and Efficacy of Cannabidiol in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A Phase 1B Pilot Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial

Veena Ranganath1, Holly Wilhalme2, Nicolette Morris3, Jenny Brook2, Mihaela Taylor1, Howard Yang1, Tanaz Kermani4, Thanda Aung2, Brian Skaggs1, David Elashoff5 and ziva Cooper6, 1UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 2UCLA, Los Angeles, 3The University of Queensland Medical School, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA, 4University of California Los Angeles, Santa Monica, CA, 5UCLA Department of Medicine Statistics Core, Los Angeles, 6UCLA Center for Cannabis and Cannabinoids, Semel Institute for Neuroscience & Human Behavior, Dept of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Dept of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Los Angeles

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Disease Activity, Outcome measures, pain, rheumatoid arthritis, Ultrasound

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 18, 2024

Title: RA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: There is no cure for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and remission rates vary greatly 10-60%; thus, there is an unmet need for safe adjunctive therapeutic agents to decrease inflammation and improve RA outcomes. The use of cannabidiol (CBD) in preclinical RA models have shown reductions in pain, disease severity, and inflammatory infiltrates. The objective of this pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to examine the dose-dependent safety and efficacy CBD relative to placebo (PBO) in RA patients with moderate to severe disease activity. 

Methods: We conducted a 12-week randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled RCT of oral CBD (200mg bid and 400mg bid), vs PBO (1:1:1) in patients with moderate to severe RA disease activity defined as disease activity score (DAS28) > 3.2 and power doppler ultrasound score (PDUS) > 5. The primary endpoint was change in DAS28 over 12 weeks and secondary endpoints included pain visual analogue scale (VAS), health assessment questionnaire (HAQ-DI), Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3), PDUS, and grey scale (GSUS) over 12 weeks. During the 12-week trial, detailed accounts of adverse and serious adverse events were captured. Linear regression models were used to compare primary and secondary outcomes for each CBD arm versus placebo. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare the changes in MSUS measures over time between each CBD arm and placebo.

Results: RA patients were randomized as follows: 15 to PBO, 16 to CBD 200mg bid, and 16 to CBD 400mg bid (Figure 1). Participants were 60.6 years (SD 14.0), 96% female, disease duration 15.9 years (SD 13.7), 62% Caucasian, and 70.2% seropositive (Table 1). After 12 weeks of treatment, DAS28 was not significantly different between CBD arms and PBO (p >0.05). For secondary outcomes PDUS, GSUS, HAQ, RAPID3, and pain VAS, there were no significant differences between CBD arms and PBO. A numerically higher reduction in pain VAS was noted in the CBD 200mg bid versus PBO (-0.95 vs -0.31, p=0.08), but not seen for CBD 400mg bid. More patients withdrew from the CBD 400mg bid group (N=5) than CBD 200mg bid (N=2) and PBO (N=0) due to adverse effects, though this was not significant (p >0.05). GI side effects were reported in the CBD 400 mg bid at 63%, CBD 200mg bid 43.8%, and PBO 33.3%.

Conclusion: This is the first RCT study examining the safety and efficacy of CBD in RA patients. Findings indicate that high doses of CBD may not be well tolerated in RA patients with moderate to severe disease activity. Overall, CBD was not effective in reducing RA disease activity as measured by clinical or imaging outcomes. However, numerical improvement in subjective pain ratings between CBD 200mg bid and PBO groups suggests future research is warranted. 

Supporting image 1

Figure 1: Study Design

Supporting image 2

Table 1: Baseline Characteristics


Disclosures: V. Ranganath: Eli Lilly, 2, mallinckrodt, 5; H. Wilhalme: None; N. Morris: None; J. Brook: None; M. Taylor: None; H. Yang: None; T. Kermani: None; T. Aung: None; B. Skaggs: None; D. Elashoff: Eli Lilly, 2, mallinckrodt, 5; z. Cooper: Canop Growth Corporation, 12, Study drug, True Terpenes, 12, Study drug.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ranganath V, Wilhalme H, Morris N, Brook J, Taylor M, Yang H, Kermani T, Aung T, Skaggs B, Elashoff D, Cooper z. Safety and Efficacy of Cannabidiol in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A Phase 1B Pilot Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-and-efficacy-of-cannabidiol-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-a-phase-1b-pilot-randomized-placebo-controlled-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-and-efficacy-of-cannabidiol-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-a-phase-1b-pilot-randomized-placebo-controlled-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology