ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1784

Roles and Perspectives of Partners of Women with Rheumatoid Arthritis on Reproductive Decision Making: A Constructivist Grounded Theory Study

Ria Garg1, Nevena Rebic2, Neda Amiri1, Glen Hazlewood3, Corisande Baldwin4, Stephanie Ensworth1, Laurie Proulx5 and Mary De Vera2, 1University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2Arthritis Research Canada, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 3University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 4University of British Columbia, Calgary, AB, Canada, 5Canadian Arthritis Patient Alliance, Ottawa, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: pregnancy, Qualitative Research, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2020

Title: Reproductive Issues in Rheumatic Disorders Poster

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Partners of women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) often take on caregiving roles given the debilitating nature of RA. No research to date has explored partners’ roles with respect to reproductive decision-making. Our objective was to explore the perspectives, attitudes, and experiences of partners of women with RA regarding reproductive decisions around family building.

Methods: Study Design: We conducted a qualitative research study involving semi-structured interviews. Participants: Individuals were eligible if they were 18 years or older, had a partner with RA who participated in our related study on how women with RA make family-building decisions, and were able to communicate in English. We define ‘partners’ as individuals within an intimate relationship. Data gathering: We conducted semi-structured telephone and video conference interviews lasting 30 to 60 minutes. Each interview followed an intensive approach characterized by use of open-ended questions. Analysis: We applied a constructivist grounded theory approach, which involved initial line-by-line coding, a strategy which promotes conceptualization of emerging themes. Afterwards we conducted focused coding which led to development of themes as indicated by theoretical saturation.

Results: We interviewed 9 partners of women with RA. All participants identified as male with a median age of 34 years. Overall, 44% had at least one child with a woman with RA while the rest had not had children with a women with RA. Additionally, 77% were considering conceiving children with their significant other with RA. Emerging themes from our analysis indicate that couples discuss reproductive options early and throughout their relationship and share the decisions for building a family. In an effort to aid their significant other, partners also discussed methods of providing support. Partners described impacts on their mental health and well-being related to additional stressors of supporting their significant other and making reproductive decisions, as well as expressing a desire for childcare support from extended family.  After having children with women with RA, partners indicated a change in perspective towards pregnancy and RA management, often resulting in the decision to have fewer children.  Table 1 shows themes and representative quotes.

Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate the far-reaching impacts of RA and reproductive decision-making on the partners of women with RA. Participants expressed taking part in shared decision-making with their partner, concern for their significant others’ physical health during pregnancy, and described impacts on their own mental health. Overall, our findings highlight the need for comprehensive supports for both women with RA and their partners throughout family building and pregnancy. Healthcare providers can identify opportunities for intervention or care adaptation that involves women with RA and their partners minimizing stress and the negative impacts on the family.

Themes and representative quotes


Disclosure: R. Garg, None; N. Rebic, None; N. Amiri, None; G. Hazlewood, None; C. Baldwin, None; S. Ensworth, None; L. Proulx, None; M. De Vera, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Garg R, Rebic N, Amiri N, Hazlewood G, Baldwin C, Ensworth S, Proulx L, De Vera M. Roles and Perspectives of Partners of Women with Rheumatoid Arthritis on Reproductive Decision Making: A Constructivist Grounded Theory Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/roles-and-perspectives-of-partners-of-women-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-on-reproductive-decision-making-a-constructivist-grounded-theory-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/roles-and-perspectives-of-partners-of-women-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-on-reproductive-decision-making-a-constructivist-grounded-theory-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology