ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meeting Abstracts
    • All Meetings
    • PRSYM 2026
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • Download Abstract Supplements
  • Keyword Index
  • My Favorites
    • View & print my favorites
  • Search

Home » Meeting Abstracts » ACR/ARP Annual Meeting 2019

Abstract Number: 1894

Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Initiating Biologic and Non-biologic DMARDs, a Population-based Study

Lingyi Li1, Na Lu 1, Diane Lacaille 2, Hui Xie 3, John Esdaile 4 and J. Antonio Avina-Zubieta 5, 1Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2Arthritis Research Canada and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 3Arthritis Research Canada and Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 4Arthritis Research Canada and the University of British Columbia, Richmond, BC, Canada, 5Arthritis Research Canada and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Email
Print

Meeting: ACR/ARP Annual Meeting 2019

Keywords: deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, DMARDs, Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), venous thromboembolism

Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: 4M117: RA – Treatments III: Cardiovascular Disease & Readmissions (1890–1895)

Session Type: ACR Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE, which includes pulmonary embolism [PE] and deep vein thrombosis [DVT]) compared with the general population. However, population-based data on the risk of VTE among patients with newly diagnosed RA and new users of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are limited. The objectives of our study were: 1) to estimate the incidence rate of VTE, PE, DVT among new users of biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) and conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs) in RA patients. 2) To compare risk of VTE, PE and DVT between new users of bDMARDs and cDMARDs.

Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study using administrative data that included all visits to physician and hospital from Jan 1990 until Mar 2015 and all dispensed medication from Sep 1995 to Mar 2015. Our sample included all patients with newly diagnosed RA using a previously validated case definition from physician billing data; and who were new users of a DMARD (no prior use in the 365 days before the first DMARD). Date of first DMARD use was considered the index date. For discontinuation, the exposure risk window for each DMARD extended until 30 days after the expiration of the last fill. Our outcomes of interest were first ever VTE, PE, and DVT based on ICD-9 or ICD-10 codes plus dispensation of an oral anti-coagulant. Follow-up began on the index date and continued until the earliest occurrence of: 1) DAMRD discontinuation; 2) leaving the province; 3) death; 4) the end of the study period; 5) the outcome of interest; or 6) switching to another DMARD. We calculated incidence rates per 100 person-years for each outcome (Table 1). Incidence rates of VTE were also stratified by age and sex. Furthermore, we conducted Cox proportional hazard regression models to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of incident VTE, PE, and DVT during periods of bDMARDs use relative to periods of cDMARDs use after adjusting for baseline covariates.

Results: 14,809 patients were new users of cDMARDs (74% female, mean age of 58 yrs) and 4,723 were new users of bDMARDs (74% female, mean age of 56 yrs). Among new users of cDMARDs and bDMARDs, 40 and 24 patients developed VTE, the incidence rate was 0.36 and 0.47 per 100 person-years (Table 1), respectively. Across cDMARDs and bDMARDs, risk of VTE increased with age and was also higher in men than women (Table 2). Comparing bDMARDs with cDMARDs, the fully adjusted HRs were 1.20 (95% CI, 0.67-2.15), 1.20 (95% CI, 0.49-2.91), 1.04 (95% CI, 0.53-2.04) (Table 3), for VTE, PE, DVT, respectively.

Conclusion: The incidence rate of VTE varies by age and sex among RA patients treated with different DMARDs. The point estimate suggests a potentially increased risk of VTE in bDMARDs compared to cDAMRDs, but the results were not statistically significant. Further studies with larger sample size and adjusting for confounding by indication are needed.


DMARDsVTEtable1

Table 1: Incidence rates of VTE by DMARDs use


DMARDsVTEtable2

Table 2: Incidence rates of VTE by DMARDs use by age and sex groups


DMARDsVTEtable3

Table 3: Relative risk of incident VTE, PE and DVT according to DMARDs use


Disclosure: L. Li, None; N. Lu, None; D. Lacaille, None; H. Xie, None; J. Esdaile, None; J. Avina-Zubieta, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Li L, Lu N, Lacaille D, Xie H, Esdaile J, Avina-Zubieta J. Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Initiating Biologic and Non-biologic DMARDs, a Population-based Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-of-venous-thromboembolism-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-initiating-biologic-and-non-biologic-dmards-a-population-based-study/. Accessed .

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-of-venous-thromboembolism-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-initiating-biologic-and-non-biologic-dmards-a-population-based-study/

My Favorites

Save and print abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract (must have cookies enabled in browser). See saved favorites.

Abstract Policies

  • ACR Convergence Abstract Embargo Policies
  • ACR Convergence Abstract Permissions & Reprints
  • PRSYM Abstract Policies

ACR Convergence. Where Rheumatology Meets

ACR Convergence 2026

Join us November 6-11 in Orlando, Florida.
See Registration Information

  • Contact ACR
  • Privacy Policy
  • ACR Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology