ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0453

Risk of Lung Cancer in Veterans with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Relation to Use of Conventional versus Biologic or Targeted Synthetic DMARDs

Namrata Singh1, Alexander Peterson2, Aaron Baraff2, K Wysham3, Bryant England4, Joshua Baker5, Nicholas Smith2, Ted R Mikuls6 and Noel Weiss7, 1University of Washington, Bellevue, WA, 2VA Puget Sound Seattle, Seattle, WA, 3VA Puget Sound/University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 4University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 5University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 6Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 7University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Anti-TNF Drugs, Epidemiology, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 12, 2023

Title: (0423–0459) RA – Treatments Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with an increased risk of lung cancer compared to the general population. While smoking is a shared risk factor, little is known about the association between use of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and development of lung cancer. We undertook this study to evaluate the association between use of conventional synthetic (cs) versus biologic (b) or targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs and incident lung cancer in patients with RA.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we identified Veterans diagnosed with RA in any United States Veterans Affairs facility from 1/1/2002 and 12/31/2018. Criteria for the presence of RA were: two or more International Classification of Diseases Version 9 or 10 (ICD9 or ICD10) diagnosis codes for RA at least 7 days apart but no more than 365 days apart, and a prescription for a csDMARD within 90 days of the first RA diagnosis (index date). The csDMARDs included in these analyses were: methotrexate, sulfasalazine, leflunomide, and hydroxychloroquine. The bDMARDs included were tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and non-TNFi biologics such as tocilizumab, rituximab, abatacept, and biosimilars; tsDMARDs included tofacitinib and baricitinib. Patients with lung cancer before the diagnosis of RA were excluded. Incident lung cancer was determined by ³2 outpatient ICD9/10 codes, or ³1 ICD9/ICD10/ICDO codes if from inpatient or the oncology raw domain. Drug exposure categories (csDMARD versus b/tsDMARD) were treated as a time-varying variable. Multivariable Cox models were fit to estimate the hazard ratio for developing lung cancer during and following the use of a b/tsDMARD relative to b/tsDMARD-naïve persons adjusting for time-varying age, rheumatic disease comorbidity index (RDCI) and RA interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD, identified using validated administrative algorithms(1)); and baseline sex, race, ethnicity, smoking status, body mass index (BMI), cohort entry (2002-2007, 2008-2013, 2014-2019), rheumatoid factor or anti-CCP positivity, use of opioids, NSAIDs, and steroids. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation by chained equations.

Results: 26,625 veterans met eligibility criteria, of whom 89% were male and 71% were Non-Hispanic White (Table 1). Over a mean (±standard deviation) follow up of 7.0 (±4.5) years, 852 incident lung cancers were detected. The age-standardized incidence among those only on csDMARDs was 4.56 per 1000-person years, compared to 5.33 for those exposed to b/tsDMARDs. In multivariable adjusted models, the hazard ratio for lung cancer in persons who had been treated with a b/tsDMARD was 1.03 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-1.21) relative to those only on csDMARDs (Figure 1).

Conclusion: Among Veterans with RA, we observed no evidence of an altered risk of lung cancer associated with different forms of RA treatment. However, incomplete information on cigarette smoking history, along with the relatively short period of follow-up, limit any conclusions that might be drawn.

Reference:
1. England BR, et al. Performance of Administrative Algorithms to Identify Interstitial Lung Disease in Rheumatoid Arthritis. AC&R 2020

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Characteristics of the cohort in person-years by DMARD exposure

Supporting image 2

Figure 1. Kaplan Meier curves showing association between use of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and lung cancer.


Disclosures: N. Singh: None; A. Peterson: None; A. Baraff: None; K. Wysham: None; B. England: Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, 5; J. Baker: CorEvitas, 2, Cumberland Pharma, 2, Horizon Pharmaceuticals, 5; N. Smith: None; T. Mikuls: Elsevier, 9, Horizon Therapeutics, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, Sanofi, 2, UCB Pharma, 2, Wolters Kluwer Health (UpToDate), 9; N. Weiss: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Singh N, Peterson A, Baraff A, Wysham K, England B, Baker J, Smith N, Mikuls T, Weiss N. Risk of Lung Cancer in Veterans with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Relation to Use of Conventional versus Biologic or Targeted Synthetic DMARDs [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-of-lung-cancer-in-veterans-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-in-relation-to-use-of-conventional-versus-biologic-or-targeted-synthetic-dmards/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-of-lung-cancer-in-veterans-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-in-relation-to-use-of-conventional-versus-biologic-or-targeted-synthetic-dmards/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology