ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1297

Risk of Dementia in Patients with Gout and the Impact of Urate-Lowering Therapies: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study

Louise Crowley, Alyshah Abdul Sultan, Edward Roddy, Christian Mallen, Joanne Protheroe and Lorna Clarson, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: gout

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies – Basic and Clinical Science Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Evidence is conflicting concerning dementia risk in gout patients, with hyperuricaemia proposed to exert a neuroprotective effect.  Serum urate (sUA) targets guiding urate-lowering therapies (ULT) are poorly evidenced-based and there is a shifting consensus towards a more lenient target to attempt to balance the theoretical harmful effects of hypouricaemia. The aim of this study was two-fold; first, to estimate the risk of dementia among patients with gout, second, to assess the potential impact of ULT.

Methods: Retrospective population-based matched cohort study conducted using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), a large anonymized primary care database.  Gout exposure was defined as a first entry of a medical code for gout (previously validated in CPRD with high accuracy (>90%))1 between April 1998-February 2016. Each gout exposed patient was matched to 4 unexposed controls on age (±5 years), gender, general practice and follow-up in CPRD (±3 years).  The absolute rate of dementia onset was calculated for gout exposed and unexposed and hazard ratios (HR) were modelled using Cox Proportional Hazards Regression. The analysis was stratified by dementia type (Alzheimers disease (AD), vascular dementia, other dementia types). Finally, among gout cases we assessed the impact of ULT on dementia onset. ULT exposure, defined as at least 6 month prescription, was assessed within 1 and 3 year exposure windows after gout diagnosis.

Results: Our cohort of 79,097 gout exposed and 276,808 unexposed had a median follow-up time of 5 years (interquartile range=6.2), mean age of 62 years (standard deviation=15.2) and 73% male. The absolute incidence rate of all-type dementia per 10,000 years was lower in the gout exposed cohort than the unexposed (35.6 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 33.8 – 37.4) vs 40.7 (95% CI 39.8 – 41.7)) corresponding to a 17% lower risk (HR=0.83 95% CI 0.78 – 0.87) (Table 1). The incidence of AD and other dementia types was lower in the gout cohort, but not vascular dementia (Table 1). Within gout cases, ULT exposure within 1 and 3 years after gout diagnosis did not significantly affect dementia risk after adjustment for potential confounders.

Conclusion: This provides observational evidence supporting the hypothesis that hyperuricaemia has a neuroprotective role, with gout patients having lower dementia risk. This risk was unaffected by ULT, but further studies are required to determine if this differs with longstanding ULT use, dose or magnitude of urate-lowering. This would help devise a more evidence-based sUA target for guiding gout management, which optimally balances a therapeutic target against the possible harmful effect of hypouricaemia.

References: 1. Meier, C. R. & Jick, H. Omeprazole, other antiulcer drugs and newly diagnosed gout. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 44, 175–8 (1997).



Disclosure: L. Crowley, None; A. Abdul Sultan, None; E. Roddy, None; C. Mallen, None; J. Protheroe, None; L. Clarson, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Crowley L, Abdul Sultan A, Roddy E, Mallen C, Protheroe J, Clarson L. Risk of Dementia in Patients with Gout and the Impact of Urate-Lowering Therapies: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-of-dementia-in-patients-with-gout-and-the-impact-of-urate-lowering-therapies-a-large-population-based-cohort-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-of-dementia-in-patients-with-gout-and-the-impact-of-urate-lowering-therapies-a-large-population-based-cohort-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology