ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0484

RheumMadness: Creating an Online Community of Inquiry

David Leverenz1, Akrithi Udupa2, Didem Saygin3, Guy Katz4, Christopher Witt2, Lisa Criscione-Schreiber5 and Matthew Sparks5, 1Duke University, Durham, NC, 2Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, 3University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 4Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 5Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Education, education, medical

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 6, 2021

Title: Abstracts: Professional Education (0484–0487)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:00PM-2:15PM

Background/Purpose: RheumMadness is an online collaborative learning experience in which rheumatology concepts compete as teams in a tournament. The Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework describes the cognitive, social, and teaching “presences” in a social constructivist learning activity. This study analyzes participant engagement and the CoI presences in the first year of RheumMadness.

Methods: RheumMadness 2021 included 16 concepts in a single-elimination bracket, scouting reports reviewing each concept created by >40 fellows from 14 fellowship programs, and a podcast (15 episodes). Participants completed brackets predicting the outcome of tournament matchups (decided by 7 judges) and discussed RheumMadness on social media (Facebook/Twitter). Web-based analytics tracked engagement with each element in RheumMadness. A Qualtrics survey was emailed to participants and shared on social media to assess engagement with RheumMadness and perceptions of the CoI presences. CoI questions were adapted from a validated 34-item CoI survey. Respondents were categorized as “full participants” if they listened to at least half the podcast episodes, read at least half the scouting reports and read social media posts at least once per week; the remainder were “partial participants.” Survey data were analyzed with Fisher’s exact test and Pearson’s correlation for linear relationships.

Results: 105 brackets were submitted in the tournament. There were 1,542 scouting report page views (96 per report) and 2,449 podcast downloads (163 per episode). The Facebook group accrued 81 members. On Twitter, there were 486 tweets from 105 users, generating 2,312,386 potential Twitter impressions.

The post-survey was sent to 100 participants who submitted a bracket; the remaining 5 brackets were from the study team. Of recipients, 58/100 (58%) responded; 19 (32.8%) were full and 39 (67.2%) partial participants. Demographics and reported engagement are shown in Table 1. CoI results are shown in Table 2. The majority of full and partial participants indicated agreement with prompts relating to the cognitive, social, and teaching presence; agreement was more frequent among full participants in each presence (p< 0.001).

Correlation analyses are shown in Figure 1. There was a significant, strongly positive correlation between overall engagement with RheumMadness and overall CoI survey scores (r=0.72, p< 0.001). The cognitive presence showed a moderate correlation with scouting report and podcast engagement but no significant correlation with social media. The social presence correlated strongly with social media and moderately with podcast engagement but no significant correlation with scouting reports. The teaching presence correlated moderately with all components.

Conclusion: RheumMadness successfully engaged learners in an online learning community. Most participants agreed that RheumMadness fostered meaningful cognitive, social, and teaching presences, especially among full participants. The cognitive presence was fostered primarily by didactic elements – the scouting reports and podcast. The social presence was fostered by social media and, to a lesser extent, the podcast. All elements contributed to the teaching presence.

Table 1. Post-survey results: demographics and engagement with RheumMadness

Table 2. Community of Inquiry (CoI) survey results for full and partial participants

Figure 1. Correlation between Community of Inquiry (CoI) scores and RheumMadness engagement


Disclosures: D. Leverenz, Pfizer, 5; A. Udupa, None; D. Saygin, None; G. Katz, None; C. Witt, None; L. Criscione-Schreiber, GlaxoSmithKline, 5; M. Sparks, National Kidney Foundation, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Leverenz D, Udupa A, Saygin D, Katz G, Witt C, Criscione-Schreiber L, Sparks M. RheumMadness: Creating an Online Community of Inquiry [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheummadness-creating-an-online-community-of-inquiry/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheummadness-creating-an-online-community-of-inquiry/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology