ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 106

Rheumatology Fellows Teaching in a Consult Setting: Pilot Project at Two Training Hospitals

Holly Smith1, Sarah Kazzaz1, Anju Mohan2 and Jammie Barnes1, 1Rheumatology, UT Health, McGovern Medical School Houston, Houston, TX, 2Internal Medicine, UT Health, McGovern Medical School Houston, Houston, TX

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: consults and educational research, Fellow-In-Training

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Education Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Subspecialty consults in a hospital setting often contribute to disjointed patient care and frustrated providers. Miloslavsky et al (1) previously demonstrated improvement in rheumatology fellows’ ability to teach in a consult setting in a standardized learner environment. We sought to perform a similar intervention in a pilot real-world setting at our two teaching hospitals. Our goals were to improve fellows’ ability to teach, create interest in the field, and facilitate more collaborative patient care.

Methods:

A 10-question pre-intervention survey was administered to residents on internal medicine teams at each of the 2 training hospitals. The survey utilized a 5-point Likert scale to address 7 aspects of rheumatology fellows’ ability to teach, overall effectiveness and approachability, as well as quantifying percentage of time recommendations were shared in person. Our intervention included: a workshop for fellows on adult learning theory and self-directed learning; provision of pocket card containing medicine team locations, contact numbers, and prompt questions; monthly email reminders of the project goals to attendings and fellows. Rheumatology attendings standardized consult rounds by visiting teams following patient evaluations to relay our recommendations; fellows were instructed to lead the discussion. We employed this strategy for four months, after which the same survey was administered to residents on medicine teams. There was no randomization or blinding due to the nature of the study.

 

Results:

There were 33 pre-intervention and 15 post-intervention completed surveys. Mean scores on each of the 10 questions improved from pre- to post-intervention. Overall teaching effectiveness improved from mean of 3.55 to 4.4 (on 5-point scale). Prior to the intervention, 9% of respondents reported receiving in-person recommendations at least 50% of the time compared to 60% of respondents after the intervention.

Conclusion:

The findings of our pilot project are similar to the “Rheumatology Fellows as Teachers” project by Miloslavsky et al (1). With a simple teaching intervention and standardization of the workflow, we improved perceived teaching skills in all areas measured. Our limitations included few survey respondents and inability to control for improvements in fellow teaching due to increased experience. Despite these limitations, our findings suggest that having a standardized process for consultation that fosters a positive teaching interaction and collaboration can have far reaching effects on resident fellow interactions as well as patient care. Future studies could include other consult services, and a paired pre- and post-intervention analysis.

1.      Miloslavsky, E. M., et al (2016), Fellow As Teacher Curriculum: Improving Rheumatology Fellows’ Teaching Skills During Inpatient Consultation. Arthritis Care & Research, 68: 877–881.


Disclosure: H. Smith, None; S. Kazzaz, None; A. Mohan, None; J. Barnes, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Smith H, Kazzaz S, Mohan A, Barnes J. Rheumatology Fellows Teaching in a Consult Setting: Pilot Project at Two Training Hospitals [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheumatology-fellows-teaching-in-a-consult-setting-pilot-project-at-two-training-hospitals/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheumatology-fellows-teaching-in-a-consult-setting-pilot-project-at-two-training-hospitals/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology