ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 301

Rheumatology Clinic Staff Needs for Partnering to Improve Blood Pressure and Tobacco Risk Management

Michelle Tong1, Laura Block2, Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi2, Edmond Ramly3 and Christie M. Bartels4, 1Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, 2University of Wisconsin School of Nursing, Madison, WI, 3Department of Family Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, 4Rheumatology/Medicine, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Cardiovascular disease, hypertension, quality of care, rheumatic disease and tobacco use

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Health Services Research Poster I – ACR/ARHP

Session Type: ACR/ARHP Combined Abstract Session

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Patients with rheumatologic conditions are at a higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) than peers. High blood pressure (BP) and tobacco use exacerbate CVD risk, yet many times these risk factors are unaddressed in patients in rheumatology clinics. We interviewed rheumatology clinic staff to identify facilitators and barriers to addressing high BP and tobacco to inform the development and dissemination of tailored CVD risk management protocols in specialty clinics. 

Methods: Medical assistants, nurses, and scheduling staff from four adult rheumatology clinics in two health systems were interviewed by two expert facilitators in seven 60 minute focus groups (n=23 BP and n=14 tobacco group participants). We analyzed transcripts using qualitative content analysis with NVivo 11 software.

Results: We found systems- (Table 1) and person-level (Table 2) facilitators and barriers to addressing BP and tobacco. Across both health systems, rheumatology clinic staff’s usual practices followed three process steps: (1) identify high BP or tobacco use, (2) follow-up within the clinic, and (3) follow-up across settings (i.e. with primary care and community resources). Focus groups identified the two key barriers as (1) lack of a system for follow-up, both within the specialty clinic and across settings, and (2) staff needs for talking points during patient interactions to address high BP and tobacco. Fragmented staff to provider communication and role perceptions were also reported as contributing to these barriers.

Conclusion: Our study identified addressable gaps in rheumatology staff’s current processes for addressing high BP and tobacco including both risk identification and facilitating management. Future work should support systems of follow-up, talking points for staff discussions, and or improve staff and provider collaboration on CVD preventive care.

Table 1. Systems-level barriers and facilitators for blood pressure (BP) & tobacco (TOB) care

THEME

ILLUSTRATION

Step 1. Identification of High BP or Tobacco Use

Standard check-in routine, time constraints

BP: “I mean we barely have time to get patients in… and then sometimes the providers come in when we’re still rooming.”

Step 2. Follow-Up Within Specialty Clinic

No standard follow-up

BP: “There is no system thing that everybody does…they have come back and were like, ‘Hey, did we ever recheck that blood pressure? I noticed it was really high.’ ‘Well that was like 2 hours ago, and I didn’t know that you wanted me to.’”

Physical reminders helped with BP rechecks

EHR structure did not support nuance of cutting back.

BP: “We give our providers stickers, so if it’s a high blood pressure, we could write it on the stickers. I don’t know that we always do though.”

Educational materials provided

Provider conversations rare

TOB: “When you give them this packet of [tobacco cessation] paperwork, it’s kind of like ‘Well, we care a little, but we don’t have time to fully follow-up.’”

Step 3. Follow-Up Across Settings

No standard process for communication with primary care

TOB: “I usually just say, ‘Do you want any information on quitting?’… And there’s been people who have said yes, but if it’s in a specialty department where their PCP isn’t there, it never gets addressed.”

Table 2. Person-level barriers for specialty blood pressure (BP) and tobacco (TOB) care

THEME

ILLUSTRATION

Provider

Providers’ perception of roles and responsibilities for BP and tobacco management varied

BP: “But then a lot of times they are like, ‘That’s not my area, primary can take care of that.’”

Nurse or medical assistant

Knowledge gaps about BP guidelines and tobacco treatments

BP: “Well they just start asking questions. I’m not the doctor, so I don’t feel like I… just try to down play it.”

Staff verbiage needs about BP and tobacco management

TOB: “I don’t have the verbiage to continue…Even when I tried to say, ‘Are you interested? I have a card’ …I don’t know where to go with it.”

Patient

Knowledge levels varied less knowledgeable about tobacco resources

BP: “[Patients] ask, ‘Well, what should [my BP] be?’ I hear that all the time.”

Patients appeared indifferent talking about BP and resistant during conversations about tobacco

TOB: “I’ve had, ‘Don’t ask me that ever again’…about if they’re a smoker.”


Disclosure: M. Tong, None; L. Block, None; A. Gilmore-Bykovskyi, Pfizer, Inc., 2; E. Ramly, Pfizer, Inc., 2; C. M. Bartels, Pfizer, Inc., 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Tong M, Block L, Gilmore-Bykovskyi A, Ramly E, Bartels CM. Rheumatology Clinic Staff Needs for Partnering to Improve Blood Pressure and Tobacco Risk Management [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheumatology-clinic-staff-needs-for-partnering-to-improve-blood-pressure-and-tobacco-risk-management/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheumatology-clinic-staff-needs-for-partnering-to-improve-blood-pressure-and-tobacco-risk-management/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology