ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0061

Rheumatologists’ Attitudes Toward Palliative Care and Medical Assistance in Dying

Alexandra Saltman1, Caroline McGuinty2, Gursimran Chandhoke3, Simon Oczkowski4, Heather McDonald-Blumer1, Ebru Kaya5 and Kirsten Wentlandt6, 1University Health Network and Sinai Health System, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Ottawa Heart Institute and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 3Lakeridge Health, Oshawa, ON, Canada, 4Juravinski Hospital and McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 5University Health Network,, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6University Health Network, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Education, pain, quality of care, quality of life, Surveys

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Friday, November 6, 2020

Title: Healthcare Disparities in Rheumatology Poster

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Despite major advances in the treatment of systemic rheumatic diseases, a population remains—including those with systemic vasculitis, inflammatory myositis and systemic sclerosis—who suffer from life-limiting disease. Typically, these patients have little access to palliative care services, and there is a paucity of data on this potential care gap. This study aims to define the referral practices of Canadian Rheumatologists to palliative care services and to explore rheumatologists’ attitudes toward palliative care and medical assistance in dying (MAiD).

Methods: All rheumatologists who are members of the Canadian Rheumatology Association were invited to complete an online questionnaire using Survey Gizmo. Responses were received anonymously by the online survey program, aggregated and analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results: 37 (19%) of rheumatologists completed the survey. 22 (60%) self-identified as academic physicians. The majority were general rheumatologists (n=30, 83%), caring primarily for adult patients (n=33, 89%). 68% reported exposure to elements of palliative care during medical training, covering pain management (n=23, 77%), management of other physical symptoms (n=21, 70%), end-of-life planning (n=19, 63%) or communication skills (n=21, 70%).

Rheumatologists categorized up to 50% of their inpatients and up to 10% of their outpatients as having advanced rheumatologic disease with significant functional limitation or low estimated 1-year survival. 44% (n=16) reported access to palliative care unit or hospice services for their patients, and 36% (n=13) were aware of local palliative home care services. 54% (n=19) had never referred a patient to palliative care services. For those who had, they did so most often for uncontrolled symptoms and prognosis less than 1 year (n=22, 66%), or for terminally ill inpatients who required assistance with discharge planning (n=24, 60%). 14% (n=5) reported feeling “very comfortable” identifying patients with life-limiting rheumatic conditions that might benefit from a palliative care approach to care, and 22% (n=5) were “very comfortable” discussing such an approach with their patients. 42% indicated they were “not very comfortable” (n=10, 28%), or “not at all comfortable” (n=5, 14%) engaging in advance care planning conversations with their patients.

While 33% (n=12) of rheumatologists had been approached by a patient requesting MAiD, a large number rated their knowledge of eligibility criteria (n=17, 47%) and of the assessment and approval process (n=19, 53%) as “poor”.

Conclusion: This study is the first to describe self-reported referral practices of rheumatologists to palliative care services, and to identify attitudes of these physicians towards palliative care consultation. The results expose gaps in knowledge of, and comfort with, palliative care services for patients with life-limiting rheumatic diseases, as well as barriers to accessing these services for patients with non-cancer illnesses. Further work is needed to engage rheumatologists about the role that palliative care teams can play in providing higher quality care to patients with advanced systemic rheumatic illnesses toward the end of life.


Disclosure: A. Saltman, None; C. McGuinty, None; G. Chandhoke, None; S. Oczkowski, None; H. McDonald-Blumer, None; E. Kaya, None; K. Wentlandt, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Saltman A, McGuinty C, Chandhoke G, Oczkowski S, McDonald-Blumer H, Kaya E, Wentlandt K. Rheumatologists’ Attitudes Toward Palliative Care and Medical Assistance in Dying [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheumatologists-attitudes-toward-palliative-care-and-medical-assistance-in-dying/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheumatologists-attitudes-toward-palliative-care-and-medical-assistance-in-dying/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology