ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2526

Revealing and Addressing Knowledge Gaps Regarding Biosimilars in Rheumatology Practice with Targeted Continuing Education and Patient Surveys

Katie Robinson and Robert Esgro, Vindico Medical Education, Thorofare, NJ

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: biosimilars, Education, medical, patient engagement and rheumatic disease

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Treatments Poster III: Biosimilars and New Compounds

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

With the recent introduction of biosimilars in the US market, providers lack knowledge of how these agents compare to reference biologics and the implications for clinical practice. Targeted continuing education (CE) is a suitable platform to assess knowledge of and attitudes towards biosimilars among providers of patients with rheumatic disease as well as to address persisting gaps towards enhanced patient care.

Methods:

Vindico Medical Education partnered with Kynectiv, Inc. to provide an interactive CE activity targeted to rheumatologists, internists, and pharmacists who care for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A survey of 17 patient influencers representative of over 650,000 patients with RA was also sent to gauge alignment of patient/provider views of biosimilars. Data was collected from October 2016 through October 2017.

Results: Overall, 49% of providers (n=598) indicated that their knowledge regarding the differences between biosimilars and reference biologics was fair or poor; the gap was more striking among pharmacists (n=186) versus rheumatologists (n=161). Similarly, 66% lacked knowledge of the regulatory pathway for biosimilars, though there was minimal difference across disciplines. Despite these knowledge gaps, nearly 78% of rheumatologists report willingness to prescribe biosimilars. Regarding pharmacy-level substitution of biosimilars, 57% of pharmacists agree that it should be allowed without restriction if deemed interchangeable by the FDA, though only 16% of rheumatologists agreed. Instead, most rheumatologists felt that a biosimilar should be substituted only of the prescriber was informed. Regarding patient concerns about biosimilars, physicians and pharmacists over-estimated concerns regarding decreased efficacy and under-estimated concerns regarding side effects. The greatest concern among patients was being forced to switch from a reference biologic to a biosimilar due to payor restrictions. Importantly, following completion of the activity, there was an 84% relative increase in knowledge regarding biosimilars, and 87% had begun talking to patients about biosimilars.

Conclusion:

Physicians and pharmacists lack knowledge regarding the approval and regulation of biosimilars as well as how these agents differ from reference biologics. In addition, they do not recognize patient concerns regarding biosimilars. These knowledge and practice gaps were closed via participation in this targeted CE activity, demonstrating the continued need for CE to activate learning and ensure the proper use of biosimilars.


Disclosure: K. Robinson, None; R. Esgro, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Robinson K, Esgro R. Revealing and Addressing Knowledge Gaps Regarding Biosimilars in Rheumatology Practice with Targeted Continuing Education and Patient Surveys [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/revealing-and-addressing-knowledge-gaps-regarding-biosimilars-in-rheumatology-practice-with-targeted-continuing-education-and-patient-surveys/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/revealing-and-addressing-knowledge-gaps-regarding-biosimilars-in-rheumatology-practice-with-targeted-continuing-education-and-patient-surveys/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology