ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2389

Relation of Pronated Foot Posture to Risk of Worsening Knee Pain during Gait and Compartment-Specific Knee Cartilage Damage

K. Douglas Gross1,2, Howard J. Hillstrom3, Emily K. Quinn4, Michael C. Nevitt5, Cora E. Lewis6, James Torner7 and David T. Felson2, 1Physical Therapy, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, 2Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 3Rehabilitation, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 4Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Boston University, Boston, MA, 5Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, 6Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, 7Epidemiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Biomechanics, foot and osteoarthritis, Knee

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Osteoarthritis - Clinical Aspects Poster II: Biomarkers, Biomechanics and Health Services Research

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:
Pronated foot posture is prevalent in older adults with knee cartilage
damage and younger adults with knee pain. Yet, there is disagreement about the
role of the pronated foot in knee OA. Many footwear interventions for older
adults encourage a highly pronated foot posture in an effort to redistribute
provocative loads away from the medial tibiofemoral (TF) compartment. Conversely,
interventions for younger adults often seek to correct the pronated foot in order
to minimize painful loading of adjacent knee compartments. In adults that have
or at risk of knee OA, we assessed the relation of pronated foot posture to
2-year risk of worsening knee pain during walking and stairs, and worsening medial
TF, lateral TF, and patellofemoral (PF) cartilage damage.

Methods: The
Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST) includes adults aged 50-79 years that
have or are at risk of knee OA. At the 60 month exam, foot posture was measured
by a single reader (ICC= 0.69) as Resting Calcaneal Stance Position (RCSP) from
photos acquired in bipedal standing. RCSP is a validated measure, with higher values
indicating a more pronated foot. From 1.0 T MRIs at 60 and 84 months, readers scored
1 knee per subject for cartilage damage in each sub-region of the medial TF,
lateral TF, and PF compartments using WORMS (weighted kappa > 0.63). Worsening
damage was any increase in WORMS score. Worsening knee pain during walking and
stairs was defined over the same period as any increase in Likert score on corresponding
questions of the WOMAC index. After forming case-based quintiles of increasing
RCSP, we combined quintiles 1-4 and used logistic regression to estimate the odds
of worsening knee pain or compartment-specific cartilage damage in knees with
the most pronated feet (quintile 5) as compared to all others (quintiles 1-4).
Adjustments were made for age, sex, and BMI. GEE accounted for non-independent knees
in a person, or sub-regions in a compartment.

Results: 2021
(mean age 67.6 ± 7.7 years, BMI 30.8 ± 6.1 kg/m2, 61.0% female)
and 2412 participants contributed 2 knees each to the analysis of worsening
knee pain during walking and stairs, respectively, and 1 knee each to the
analysis of worsening medial TF (1185 knees), lateral TF (1145 knees), and PF (1145
knees) cartilage damage. Mean RCSP was 5.1 ± 4.7°. Odds of worsening knee pain
during walking and stairs were 23% lower (OR= 0.77, p= 0.03) and 26% lower (OR=
0.74, p< 0.01), respectively, among knees with the most highly pronated foot
posture (RSCP 8.2° to 27.0°). There was no association between pronated foot
posture and risk of worsening knee cartilage damage (see table).

Conclusion: In adults that have or are at-risk of knee OA, a
highly pronated foot
posture is protective against worsening
knee pain during walking and stair climbing, but does not protect against
worsening knee cartilage damage.


Disclosure: K. D. Gross, None; H. J. Hillstrom, None; E. K. Quinn, None; M. C. Nevitt, None; C. E. Lewis, None; J. Torner, None; D. T. Felson, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gross KD, Hillstrom HJ, Quinn EK, Nevitt MC, Lewis CE, Torner J, Felson DT. Relation of Pronated Foot Posture to Risk of Worsening Knee Pain during Gait and Compartment-Specific Knee Cartilage Damage [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/relation-of-pronated-foot-posture-to-risk-of-worsening-knee-pain-during-gait-and-compartment-specific-knee-cartilage-damage/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/relation-of-pronated-foot-posture-to-risk-of-worsening-knee-pain-during-gait-and-compartment-specific-knee-cartilage-damage/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology