ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2251

Reduction in Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease Risk in Patients Treated with Tofacitinib

Matthew Baker1, Yuhan Liu1, Rong Lu1, Janice Lin1, Jason Melehani1 and William Robinson2, 1Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 2Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Biologicals, Cohort Study, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), interstitial lung disease, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2022

Title: Abstracts: RA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, and Outcomes III: RA ILD

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Clinically significant interstitial lung disease (ILD) occurs in roughly 10% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). There are limited data on the pathogenesis of RA-ILD; risk factors include smoking, rheumatoid factor or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide autoantibodies, and genetic variants including MUC5B, HLA-B54, HLA-B40, and HLA-DQ1B*060. Current data are lacking regarding the risk of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (b/tsDMARD) use on the development, and/or exacerbation, of RA-ILD. The objective of this nationwide, retrospective study was to estimate the incidence of ILD in RA patients treated with different b/tsDMARDs and to compare the risk of developing ILD between patients treated with different b/tsDMARDs and adalimumab.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study used the Optum Clinformatics® Data Mart (2003-2019). Adult patients with RA, ≥1 year of continuous enrollment, treatment with a b/tsDMARD of interest, and without preexisting ILD were included. Crude incidence rates (IRs) for the development of ILD were calculated. The risk of ILD across different b/tsDMARDs was compared using Cox-regression models. A sensitivity analysis using a prevalent new-user cohort design compared patients treated with tofacitinib with patients treated with adalimumab at a similar timepoint in their disease course.

Results: A total of 28,559 RA patients (mean age 56 years; 78% female) were treated with adalimumab (n=13,326), abatacept (n=5,676), rituximab (n=5,444), tocilizumab (n=2,548), or tofacitinib (n=1,565) (Table 1). The crude IRs per 1,000 person-years of ILD were 3.43 (95% CI 2.85-4.09) for adalimumab, 4.46 (95% CI 3.44-5.70) for abatacept, 6.15 (95% CI 4.76-7.84) for rituximab, 5.05 (95% CI 3.47-7.12) for tocilizumab, and 1.47 (95% CI 0.54-3.27) for tofacitinib (Table 2). After multiple adjustments, compared with patients treated with adalimumab, patients treated with tofacitinib had a lower risk of ILD (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.31, 95% CI 0.12-0.78, p=0.009) (Table 2 and Figure 1). Utilizing the prevalent new-user cohort design, after 3:1 propensity score matching, cohorts of 4,677 patients treated with adalimumab and 1,559 patients treated with tofacitinib were constructed (mean age 58 years, 83% female, 11 outpatient visits per year, roughly 38% methotrexate use for both groups). The IR per 1,000 person-years of ILD for RA patients treated with tofacitinib was 1.48 (95% CI 0.54-3.28), compared with 4.30 (95% CI 3.15-5.74) for adalimumab. In the adjusted model, there was a 67% reduction in risk for the development of ILD in patients treated with tofacitinib compared with adalimumab (aHR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13-0.83, p=0.019).

Conclusion: In this large, retrospective nationwide study, we demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of developing ILD in RA patients treated with tofacitinib. There are currently no guidelines for the treatment of patients with RA at risk for developing ILD or with existing ILD. These results suggest that treatment with tofacitinib, and perhaps other Janus kinase inhibitors, may provide benefit in reducing the risk of developing ILD and could be considered for treating patients with RA and preexisting ILD as well.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3

Figure 1. Adjusted HRs of ILD in RA patients by treatment.


Disclosures: M. Baker, None; Y. Liu, None; R. Lu, None; J. Lin, None; J. Melehani, None; W. Robinson, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Baker M, Liu Y, Lu R, Lin J, Melehani J, Robinson W. Reduction in Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease Risk in Patients Treated with Tofacitinib [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/reduction-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-associated-interstitial-lung-disease-risk-in-patients-treated-with-tofacitinib/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/reduction-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-associated-interstitial-lung-disease-risk-in-patients-treated-with-tofacitinib/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology