ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1146

Reducing Imaging Tests for Low Back Pain: Can Patients Choose Wisely?

Nick Bansback1, Judy Chiu2, Sheila Kerr3, Rita McCracken2,4 and Bruce Forster5, 1School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 3Arthritis Patient Advisory Board, Richmond, BC, Canada, 4Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 5Professor and Head, Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Education, low back pain and radiology, patient

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Education - Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Management of nonspecific acute low back pain (LBP) is complicated by many patients’ belief that imaging tests will be useful. Choosing Wisely is a campaign that represents a physician-driven effort to create conversations between physicians and patients around overuse and waste. The objective of this study was to determine the potential impact of the Choosing Wisely educational pamphlet on patients’ behavioural intentions for future imaging tests.

Methods: We recruited a cohort representative of the Canadian adult general population to a web survey in English and French to consider the impact of the Choosing Wisely campaign for LBP. We first ascertained respondents’ experiences of LBP, and baseline behavioural intentions for a future LBP episode, including attitudes, beliefs and knowledge on LBP and imaging tests. We next asked respondents to read the Choosing Wisely pamphlet before asking follow-up questions to understand the pamphlet’s potential impact.

Results: Of the 3386 respondents that began the survey, 2985 completed all questions and were included in the analysis. Respondents broadly matched the age and gender of the Canadian population, with 7% completing the survey in French. 1918 (64%) of respondents reported an episode of LBP in the past year, of which 1081 (56%) visited a health professional. Of the 799 who reported they had no red flag, 336 (42%) received an imaging test for their LBP, predominantly X-ray. Overall, 37% and 39% of respondents stated that they would want or expect an imaging test for future LBP. After reading the Choosing Wisely educational pamphlet, this reduced from 39% to 24% (p<0.001) for wanting, and 37% to 22% (p<0.001) for expecting an imaging test. Similar improvement was seen in knowledge questions about the need and potential risks of imaging tests, and for alternative management strategies.

Conclusion: The Choosing Wisely pamphlet for LBP was effective in changing some individuals’ behavioural intentions around imaging tests. Simple extrapolation implies in Canada each year there are over 2 million inappropriate x-rays and 700,000 inappropriate MRIs for LBP. This costs between $300-$600 million per year. Conservative estimates suggest implementing the Choosing Wisely campaign could save $30 million per year. Future analysis will explore subgroups where the influence of the Choosing Wisely pamphlet is most and least. Follow-up studies are planned to assess whether respondents stated changes in behavioural intentions.  


Disclosure: N. Bansback, None; J. Chiu, None; S. Kerr, None; R. McCracken, None; B. Forster, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Bansback N, Chiu J, Kerr S, McCracken R, Forster B. Reducing Imaging Tests for Low Back Pain: Can Patients Choose Wisely? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/reducing-imaging-tests-for-low-back-pain-can-patients-choose-wisely/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/reducing-imaging-tests-for-low-back-pain-can-patients-choose-wisely/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology