ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0264

Reasons for Early Discontinuation of Targeted Synthetic (ts) or Biologic (b) DMARDs; Chart Review of 20,343 Drug Episodes Given to Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Kent Kwas Huston1, Christopher Adams2, Simon Helfgott3, Jasvinder singh4, Nehad Soloman5, Dan Persons6, Scott Milligan6 and Colin Edgerton2, 1Kansas City Physician Partners Center for Rheumatic Disease, Kansas City, MO, 2Articularis Healthcare, Sullivans Island, SC, 3Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 4University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 5Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates, P.C., Peoria, AZ, 6Trio Health, Louisville, CO

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: biologic response modifiers, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), Patient reported outcomes, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 12, 2022

Title: RA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, and Outcomes Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: The development, exacerbation, or unimprovement of clinical conditions during DMARD treatment may lead patients to abandon treatment before the necessary time has elapsed for drug effectiveness. To better understand the nature of events that lead to early discontinuation, we reviewed b/tsDMARD episodes discontinued by patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) while in care of the American Rheumatology Network (ARN).

Methods: Data source: PIONEER-Rheumatology, an enhanced database combining fielded EMR data with extracted information from open text (office visits, infusions logs, and provider-patient communications). Discontinuation reasons in visit notes were classified by clinical scribes into categories [FIGURE 1] and supplemented with additional context for greater granularity. Based on scribe input, discontinued episodes were labeled as attrition (death, moved/left practice, non-clinical reasons), lost to follow up (LTFU, patient disengaged from care), or clinical (treatment goal achieved, lack/loss of efficacy, or condition resulting from disease, treatment, or patient burden). Clinical reasons not reflecting lack/loss of efficacy were further stratified into manageable (defined as potentially avoidable or controlled with provider or patient action) v. non-manageable conditions (comorbid conditions, e.g. cancer). Study population: Adult (18+ years old) patients with RA who discontinued one or more b/tsDMARDs episodes between 2017 to 2021. Statistical comparisons made using chi-square (SPSS v22).

Results: 10328 patients discontinued 20343 b/tsDMARD episodes; LTFU accounted for 5% (1026) of discontinuations, 21% (4279) were due to attrition, and 74% (15038) clinical reasons. Of episodes with 1 or more clinical reason, 2% (296/15038) resulted from achieving treatment goals, 54% (8058/15038) indicated lack of efficacy, 37% (5338/15038) non-manageable condition, and 41% (6136/15038) manageable condition. Most common conditions were pain (38%, 5769/15038), fatigue/malaise (36%, 5469/15038), inflammation (30%, 4535/15038), infection (13%, 1959/15038), dermatologic (13%, 1894/15038), infusion/allergic reaction (6%, 931/15038), gastrointestinal (5%, 795/15038), and flu/cold-like symptoms (5%, 768/15038). For episodes discontinued due to a clinical reason (n=15038), episodes discontinued within 90 days had higher proportions of discontinuations citing dermatologic issues (17% v. 11% post 90 days), infusion/allergic reactions (12% v. 4% post 90 days), gastrointestinal (9% v. 4% post 90 days), and flu/cold-like symptoms (8% v. 4% post 90 days), though proportions and differences varied by drug class. [TABLE 2] The onset of conditions, as a function of time to discontinuation, was similar across drug classes, though observable differences in slope were evident between certain drug classes. [FIGURE 1]

Conclusion: This study of 20343 discontinued b/tsDMARD episodes provides a foundation for understanding the timing of discontinuations relative to reasons for such, and may inform care strategies to enable maximal therapeutic benefit.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: K. Huston, None; C. Adams, None; S. Helfgott, Abbott Ltd., Genentech; J. singh, Schipher, Crealta/Horizon, Medisys, Fidia, PK Med, Two Labs Inc., Adept Field Solutions, Clinical Care Options, Clearview Healthcare Partners, Putnam Associates, Focus Forward, Navigant Consulting, Spherix, MedIQ, Jupiter Life Science, UBM LLC, Trio Health, Medscape, WebMD, Practice Point Communications, National Institutes of Health, American College of Rheumatology, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Intuitive Surgical Inc./Philips Electronics North America, TPT Global Tech, Vaxart Pharmaceuticals, Atyu Biopharma, Adaptimmune Therapeutics, GeoVax Labs, Pieris Pharmaceuticals, Enzolytics Inc., Seres Therapeutics, Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding Corp, Charlotte's Web Holdings, Inc., Amarin, Viking, Moderna Pharmaceuticals, Simply Speaking, Outcomes Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT), FDA Arthritis Advisory Committee, Veterans Affairs Rheumatology Field Advisory Board (FAB), University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group Satellite Center on Network Meta-analysis; N. Soloman, AbbVie/Abbott, Horizon, Janssen, Amgen, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), AstraZeneca; D. Persons, AbbVie/Abbott, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), AstraZeneca, UCB; S. Milligan, AbbVie/Abbott, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), UCB; C. Edgerton, Novartis, Boehringer-Ingelheim.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Huston K, Adams C, Helfgott S, singh J, Soloman N, Persons D, Milligan S, Edgerton C. Reasons for Early Discontinuation of Targeted Synthetic (ts) or Biologic (b) DMARDs; Chart Review of 20,343 Drug Episodes Given to Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/reasons-for-early-discontinuation-of-targeted-synthetic-ts-or-biologic-b-dmards-chart-review-of-20343-drug-episodes-given-to-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/reasons-for-early-discontinuation-of-targeted-synthetic-ts-or-biologic-b-dmards-chart-review-of-20343-drug-episodes-given-to-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology