ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0792

Radiographic and Pain Outcomes from a Phase 3 Trial (OA-07) Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Repeat Lorecivivint Injections over 3 Years in Subjects with Knee OA

Yusuf Yazici1, Jeyanesh Tambiah2, Christopher Swearingen3 and Timothy McAlindon4, 1NYU Grossman School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, 2Biosplice Therapeutics Inc., San Diego, CA, 3Biosplice Therapeutics, Inc, San Diego, CA, 4University of Massachusets, Worchester, MA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: clinical trial, Joint Structure, Osteoarthritis, Patient reported outcomes, WOMAC

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 16, 2024

Title: Abstracts: Osteoarthritis – Clinical Trials

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 1:00PM-2:30PM

Background/Purpose: Knee OA has unmet need for safe and efficacious symptom and disease-modifying treatments. Lorecivivint (LOR), an intra-articular (IA) CLK/DYRK inhibitor thought to modulate inflammatory and Wnt pathways has previously appeared safe, improved patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and maintained radiographic medial joint space width (JSW) compared with placebo (PBO). A Phase 3 extension trial, OA-07 (NCT04520607), evaluated LOR safety and efficacy with medial JSW, WOMAC Pain and Function outcomes. This trial’s objective was to evaluate efficacy and safety of long-term, repeated LOR usage in patients with moderate-to-severe knee OA.

Methods: Enrolled patients had advanced knee OA (medial JSW 1.5-4 mm) and completed OA-11 LOR trial (NCT 03928184), a 1-year, single injection Phase 3 trial. At Week 0 of OA-07 Year 1 (blinded for participants and investigators), patients received a second, repeat injection according to original randomization (LOR / PBO; Figs. 1A, 1B, 2, Visit 1E). In OA-07 Year 2, all participants (still blinded to original treatment)   entered an open-label ‘crossover’ phase receiving a LOR 0.07 mg (third) injection, (Figs. 1A, 1B, 2, Visit 3E). Baseline-adjusted ANCOVA estimated differences between LOR and PBO outcomes using OA-07 baseline measures. Treatment effect at Month 36 (Visit 6E) was estimated using marginal comparison from baseline adjusted ANCOVA to last PBO observation prior to crossover.

Results: 276 patients (mean age 61.0 ± 8.2 years, BMI 31.8 ± 4.9 kg/m2, female 62.7%, Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 3 45.3%, medial JSW 2.63 ± 0.69 mm, 67.4% bilaterally symptomatic) were enrolled. LOR appeared safe and well-tolerated with no major adverse event rate differences compared to PBO.

In Year 1 (blinded portion) of OA-07 , statistically significant improvements were observed for LOR vs PBO in WOMAC Pain [0-100] at Week 24, Visit 2E (∆=-4.52, 95% CI [-8.92, -0.13], P=0.044); Week 48, Visit 3E (∆=-5.19, 95% CI [-9.86, -0.53], P=0.029) (Figure 1a), and WOMAC Function [0-100] at Week 48 (∆=-4.86, 95% CI [-9.36, -0.35], P=0.035) adjusting for OA-07 baseline (Figure 1b). In Year 2 (crossover portion) of OA-07, all PBO patients receiving LOR showed mean improvements in WOMAC Pain and Function from Visit 3E observations.

Additionally, compared to the LOR arm, the PBO arm showed a numerical loss in medial JSW  at Visit 3E, 24 months after first injection. At Visit 6E, 36 months after first injection, this loss was statistically significant compared to the last available PBO measure prior to crossover assuming a) no change (∆ = 0.22 mm, conservative scenario [P=0.001]) and b) progression (∆ = 0.38 mm, realistic scenario [P< 0.001]) (Fig. 2).   

Conclusion: The OA-07 trial met its objective as repeat LOR 0.07 mg injections appeared to be safe and efficacious. Significant improvements in pain and function compared to PBO were seen at 6 and 12 months. Significant improvement in medial JSW was seen after repeat LOR injections compared to PBO. PBO patients who crossed to LOR treatment showed symptomatic and structural benefits after 12 months, providing further evidence of potential efficacy. LOR continues to show promise as a safe, disease-modifying knee OA treatment.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1. Change from baseline in (a) WOMAC Pain and (b) WOMAC Function

Supporting image 2

Figure 2. Change from baseline in Medial Joint Space Width


Disclosures: Y. Yazici: Amgen, 2, Biosplice, 8, Chugai, 2, Hemay, 2; J. Tambiah: Biosplice Therapeutics Inc, 3; C. Swearingen: Biosplice Therapeutics, Inc, 3; T. McAlindon: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Yazici Y, Tambiah J, Swearingen C, McAlindon T. Radiographic and Pain Outcomes from a Phase 3 Trial (OA-07) Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Repeat Lorecivivint Injections over 3 Years in Subjects with Knee OA [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/radiographic-and-pain-outcomes-from-a-phase-3-trial-oa-07-evaluating-the-efficacy-and-safety-of-repeat-lorecivivint-injections-over-3-years-in-subjects-with-knee-oa/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/radiographic-and-pain-outcomes-from-a-phase-3-trial-oa-07-evaluating-the-efficacy-and-safety-of-repeat-lorecivivint-injections-over-3-years-in-subjects-with-knee-oa/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology