ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0116

Racial Differences in Medication Beliefs and Barriers to Taking Medications Among Patients with SLE

Emilio Guzman Cisneros1, Shannon Herndon1, Theresa Coles2, Corrine Voils3, Megan Clowse4, Rebecca Sadun4, Jennifer Rogers5, Lisa Criscione-Schreiber2, Jayanth Doss4, Amanda Eudy6 and Kai Sun4, 1Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, 2Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 3University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, 4Duke University, Durham, NC, 5Duke, Durham, NC, 6Duke University, Raleigh, NC

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Disparities, health behaviors, Minority Health, race/ethnicity, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 12, 2022

Title: Healthcare Disparities in Rheumatology Poster

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Medication adherence is critical for SLE management and can be influenced by patients’ barriers and beliefs about treatment. Patients of color with SLE have higher rates of medication nonadherence leading to worse health outcomes. However, racial differences in barriers and beliefs about medications have not been well studied. We compared differences in medication beliefs and barriers to taking SLE medications between Black and White patients and explored the association between beliefs and adherence.

Methods: Patients meeting ACR or SLICC SLE criteria from an academic lupus clinic completed the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) that measures four domains: disease-specific medication necessity, disease-specific medication concern, general medication overuse, and general medication harm. Participants also completed the SLE-specific Domains of Subjective Extent of Nonadherence (DOSE-Nonadherence-SLE), which has two domains measuring the extent of and reasons for nonadherence over the past 7 days. We compared scores in BMQ and DOSE-Nonadherence-SLE between Black and White patients and explored differences in BMQ scores between adherent and nonadherent patients stratified by race.

Results: The analysis included 125 patients (52% Black, median age 49, 94% female, 59% ≥ college education, 41% Medicaid/Medicare insurance, median disease duration 14 years). Adherence measured by DOSE-Nonadherence-SLE was 64% among White, and 44% among Black participants (p=0.02).

Black compared to White patients had significantly higher scores in BMQ domains of SLE-specific medication concern and general medication overuse and harm (Table 1). There were no significant differences in BMQ scores between adherent and nonadherent White patients. Nonadherent Black patients had significantly lower scores in BMQ SLE-specific necessity and higher scores in BMQ general overuse and harm than adherent Black patients (Table 2).

Nonadherent Black patients on average identified four barriers to medication adherence compared to three identified by their White counterparts (p=0.009). Among nonadherent Black patients, 45% reported missing doses because they felt well, compared to 0% of nonadherent White patients (p< 0.001). Additionally, 15% of nonadherent Black patients worried that SLE medicines would affect their fertility, and 9% worried that their doctor did not prescribe the right SLE medicine, while none of these factors were reported by White patients as barriers to adherence (Table 3).

Conclusion: Black patients with SLE were more likely to be nonadherent, have more adherence barriers and greater mistrust about medications. Specifically, nonadherent Black patients held stronger beliefs that medicines were overused and harmful in general, and weaker beliefs that SLE medicines were necessary. These beliefs may reflect a general sense of mistrust in the medical system and may drive the behavior of skipping doses when feeling well and when concerns arise. Our results suggest that adherence interventions among Black patients should include a focus on building trust and an emphasis on ensuring adherence even when the patient feels well.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: E. Guzman Cisneros, None; S. Herndon, None; T. Coles, Pfizer, Regenxbio, Merck/MSD; C. Voils, None; M. Clowse, Exagen; R. Sadun, None; J. Rogers, Pfizer, Exagen, Aurinia, Immunovant, Janssen, Eli Lilly; L. Criscione-Schreiber, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), UCB; J. Doss, Pfizer; A. Eudy, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), Pfizer, Exagen; K. Sun, Exagen.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Guzman Cisneros E, Herndon S, Coles T, Voils C, Clowse M, Sadun R, Rogers J, Criscione-Schreiber L, Doss J, Eudy A, Sun K. Racial Differences in Medication Beliefs and Barriers to Taking Medications Among Patients with SLE [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/racial-differences-in-medication-beliefs-and-barriers-to-taking-medications-among-patients-with-sle/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/racial-differences-in-medication-beliefs-and-barriers-to-taking-medications-among-patients-with-sle/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology