ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0131

Racial Differences in Bone Health of Sarcoidosis Patients: A Retrospective Study

Emily Peninger1, Christian Ascoli2, Rachel Lane2, Subash Kukreja2, Robert Baughman3 and Nadera Sweiss2, 1University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 2University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 3University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Bone density, Cohort Study, Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), Miscellaneous Rheumatic and Inflammatory Diseases, race/ethnicity

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 12, 2022

Title: Miscellaneous Rheumatic and Inflammatory Diseases Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Bone health in sarcoidosis is a complex topic, though data regarding racial differences in this population is lacking. Our study sought to identify racial differences in bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemical markers associated with bone metabolism in patients with sarcoidosis.

Methods: A retrospective study was performed on patients with a diagnosis code of sarcoidosis who received care at our tertiary sarcoidosis referral center and had undergone dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan between 2011 and 2019. Medical records were individually reviewed and data regarding demographics, sarcoidosis diagnosis and treatment, comorbidities, laboratory values and DXA results were abstracted. Data analysis used Chi square tests, Mann Whitney tests, and univariate and multivariate regression models in the R statistical environment (version 4.2).

Results: We identified 70 patients who met inclusion criteria (Table 1). Thirty-seven (52.9%) were White and 33 (47.1%) were Black. Mean disease duration was 8 years with 60 (89.6%) having pulmonary involvement and 52 (77.6%) with other documented organ involvement. Sixty-eight (97.1%) of patients had received treatment with glucocorticoids, 56 (80%) with nonbiologic DMARDs, and 15 (21.4%) with biologic DMARDs. We were unable to calculate cumulative glucocorticoid dosing based on clinical documentation. Comorbidities did not differ significantly amongst racial groups.

Eight (11.4%) patients were diagnosed with osteoporosis based on BMD and 27 (38.6%) with osteopenia. Older age and lower BMI were associated with reduced BMD (p=0.043 and 0.003, respectively) and this association was confirmed with a univariate logistic regression model.

Black subjects had significantly lower rates of osteopenia (21.2% vs 54.1%) or osteoporosis (9.1% vs 13.5%). A multivariate regression model, adjusted for age and BMI, showed that compared to White subjects, the odds ratio of a Black patient having low BMD was 0.308 (p=0.043, 95% CI 0.095-0.952).

As shown in Table 2, Black subjects had significantly higher T-scores than White subjects at the femoral neck (0.3 vs -1.4, p< 0.001) and total hip (0.4 vs -0.9, p=< 0.001), but not at the AP spine (0 vs -0.7, p=0.209). Black subjects were also more likely to have had a vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) performed, though only 1 out of 14 demonstrated a vertebral fracture.

Analysis of biochemical parameters did not demonstrate any statistically significant differences amongst racial groups (Table 3).

Conclusion: Our study revealed that despite similar clinical and laboratory characteristics to White patients, Black patients with sarcoidosis had significantly greater femoral neck and total hip T-scores and less prevalence of osteoporosis or osteopenia. However, interestingly, vertebral T-scores were not significantly different between groups. This suggests that despite higher bone density at other sites, Black patients with sarcoidosis may have similar risk of vertebral fractures as their White counterparts.

Supporting image 1

DMARD = disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3

Reference ranges: 1,25(OH)2D3 19.9-79.3 pg/mL; 25(OH)D3 ≥20ng/mL; Calcium 8.6_10.6 mg/dL; CRP <8.0mg/L; ESR 0_20mm/H


Disclosures: E. Peninger, None; C. Ascoli, None; R. Lane, None; S. Kukreja, None; R. Baughman, Boehringer-Ingelheim, aTyr, Genentech, Bayer, Mallinckrodt, United Therapeutics, Bellephron; N. Sweiss, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Peninger E, Ascoli C, Lane R, Kukreja S, Baughman R, Sweiss N. Racial Differences in Bone Health of Sarcoidosis Patients: A Retrospective Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/racial-differences-in-bone-health-of-sarcoidosis-patients-a-retrospective-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/racial-differences-in-bone-health-of-sarcoidosis-patients-a-retrospective-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology