ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0690

Quantitative 18F-FDG PET-CT of the lungs detects treatment induced changes in patients with early severe diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis and interstitial lung disease

Bo Broens1, esther Nossent1, Lilian Meijboom1, Gerben Zwezerijnen1, julia Spierings2, Jeska de Vries-Bouwstra3, Jacob M. van Laar4, Conny van der Laken1 and Alexandre Voskuijl5, 1Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center, Ultrecht, The Netherlands, Utrecht, Netherlands, 3Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 4UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, 5Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Computed tomography (CT), Imaging, interstitial lung disease, Scleroderma, Systemic

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0671–0710) Systemic Sclerosis & Related Disorders – Clinical Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Patients with early severe diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) with interstitial lung disease (ILD) have poor prognosis. New tools are needed to improve treatment stratification and monitoring. Studies with repeated positron emission tomography-computed tomography with [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG PET-CT) in this specific high-risk group have not been performed and may have clinical value. In this study we aimed to (1) assess changes in [18F]FDG lung uptake between baseline and follow-up after different treatment regimens (2) identify if [18F]FDG lung uptake at baseline is associated with ILD progression during follow-up.

Methods: [18F]FDG PET-CT scans of the lungs were performed at baseline and repeated one year after initial randomization to cyclophosphamide pulse therapy or autologous stem cell transplantation within the UPSIDE trial (NCT04464434). All [18F]FDG PET-CT scans were analyzed by manual placement of 2 cm volumes of interest (VOIs) in 22 pre-defined lung areas and mean standardized uptake values (SUVs) of [18F]FDG tracer uptake were corrected for the uptake in the mediastinal blood pool. Percentual changes after one year were calculated by the mean of all VOIs. Changes in [18F]FDG lung uptake were compared to clinical assessment of ILD development. At 1 year follow-up, ILD progression was defined according to the Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis (PPF) criteria (2 out of 3 criteria): (1) increased respiratory symptoms, (2) decreased FVC≥5% or DLCO≥10% (3) increased lung fibrosis on HRCT, while patients met criteria for ILD improvement with (2 out of 3) reversed criteria: (1) decreased respiratory symptoms, (2) increased FVC≥5% or DLCO≥10% (3) decreased lung fibrosis on HRCT. Stable ILD was defined as having neither progression nor improvement. Between group differences were analyzed using non-parametric tests.

Results: Eleven patients were included. Five patients were female, with a median age of 54 years and median disease duration of 9.5 months at baseline. Patients with ILD progression at 1 year (n=3) showed increased [18F]FDG uptake (corrected SUVmean +21.7%) after 1 year, while patients with improved ILD (n=4) showed decreased [18F]FDG uptake (corrected SUVmean -19.4%) over time (Figure 1 and 2A). Less evident differences were observed in patients with stable ILD (n=4; corrected SUVmean -1.5%). Finally, [18F]FDG uptake at baseline did not differ between patients who did or did not progress at 1 year of follow-up (Figure 2B).

Conclusion: [18F]FDG uptake in the lungs changed in line with clinical response to therapy in patients with early severe dcSSc and ILD. These results suggests that [18F]FDG PET-CT has the potential to have additive value in the monitoring of SSc-ILD.

Supporting image 1Figure 1. Visual and quantitative decrease in pulmonary [18F]FDG uptake in a patient with early severe diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis and interstitial lung disease with clinical improvement

Supporting image 2Figure 2. (Changes in) Quantitative [18F]FDG uptake between different patient groups (improved, stable or progressed interstitial lung disease)


Disclosures: B. Broens: None; e. Nossent: None; L. Meijboom: None; G. Zwezerijnen: None; j. Spierings: None; J. de Vries-Bouwstra: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 6, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, 6, Jannsen-Cilag, 5, Janssen, 2, 6, Roche, 5; J. van Laar: None; C. van der Laken: None; A. Voskuijl: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Broens B, Nossent e, Meijboom L, Zwezerijnen G, Spierings j, de Vries-Bouwstra J, van Laar J, van der Laken C, Voskuijl A. Quantitative 18F-FDG PET-CT of the lungs detects treatment induced changes in patients with early severe diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis and interstitial lung disease [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/quantitative-18f-fdg-pet-ct-of-the-lungs-detects-treatment-induced-changes-in-patients-with-early-severe-diffuse-cutaneous-systemic-sclerosis-and-interstitial-lung-disease/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/quantitative-18f-fdg-pet-ct-of-the-lungs-detects-treatment-induced-changes-in-patients-with-early-severe-diffuse-cutaneous-systemic-sclerosis-and-interstitial-lung-disease/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology