ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1242

Qualitative Patient Interview Study in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus to Assess Patient Perception of Fatigue and Skin-Related Symptoms

Joseph F. Merola1, Victoria Werth2, Jiyoon C. Choi3, Brandon Becker3, Teresa Edwards4, Coburn Hobar5, Samantha Pomponi5 and Vibeke Strand6, 1UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 2Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 3Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, 4RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, 5Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, 6Division of Immunology/Rheumatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Patient reported outcomes, Qualitative Research, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 17, 2024

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disorder that disproportionately impacts women of childbearing age. Although the incidence varies widely based on ethnic and geographic differences, approximately 204,000 persons in the US had SLE in 2018. To understand the nature and relative importance of skin symptoms, evaluate the content validity of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) scale in SLE, and assess what constitutes meaningful change in SLE-related fatigue and skin symptoms, this qualitative study held interviews with individuals with SLE.

Methods: In August 2023, individual interviews were conducted in the US in adults who reported receiving a diagnosis of SLE at least 6 months prior to screening and who experienced SLE-related fatigue, fever, joint pain, and/or skin rash/redness in the 30 days prior to their interview. Each 60-minute virtual interview was conducted in English in a semistructured format, using an interview guide to encourage response spontaneity and to ensure consistent, systematic data collection. Study participants described, in their own words, their experience of SLE-related fatigue and skin symptoms and what constituted minimal meaningful improvement in each symptom, using the Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scales. Cognitive debriefing and content validity of SLE-related fatigue were elicited using the 13-item FACIT-Fatigue scale. Regarding the ACR classification criteria for SLE, all diagnoses were self reported.

Results: The 18 participants interviewed had a mean age of 51.7 years (range, 33–67), 94.4% (n=17) were female, and 50.0% (n=9) were White (Table). Mean time since the clinical diagnosis of SLE was 12.2 years (range, 1–37). All but 1 participant reported experiencing SLE-related fatigue prior to or near the time of SLE diagnosis. This SLE-related fatigue was described as tiredness/exhaustion that sleeping does not help, lack of energy, feeling sluggish/heavy, and/or needing to rest/sleep during the day. Most participants (94.4%; n=17) were able to understand and answer all items without difficulty. The majority of participants (72.2%; n=13) also indicated that even a 1-point improvement in fatigue on the PGIS would be meaningful. Among participants reporting SLE-associated skin symptoms (n=17), rash/redness and alopecia/hair loss were the most frequently reported, most bothersome, and/or most important symptoms to be addressed by a new treatment (Figure). All participants understood the skin-specific PGIS and PGIC items without difficulty. Overall, 82.4% (n=14) indicated that a 1-point improvement on the PGIS would be meaningful, while 70.6% (n=12) indicated that “a little better” on the PGIC would represent meaningful improvement in skin symptoms.

Conclusion: These results support the content validity of the FACIT-Fatigue scale in SLE trials and suggest that even minimal improvement in fatigue and skin symptoms are meaningful to patients. New treatment options that can alleviate fatigue and skin symptoms are needed for patients with SLE.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2


Disclosures: J. Merola: AbbVie, 2, 12, Investigator, Amgen, 2, 12, Investigator, Biogen, 2, 12, Investigator, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 12, Investigator, Dermavant, 2, 12, Investigator, Janssen, 2, 12, Investigator, LEO Pharma, 2, 12, Investigator, Lilly, 2, 12, Investigator, Novartis, 2, 12, Investigator, Pfizer, 2, 12, Investigator, Regeneron, 2, 12, Investigator, Sanofi, 2, 12, Investigator, Sun Pharma, 2, 12, Investigator, UCB, 2, 12, Investigator; V. Werth: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Argenx, 2, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, Beacon Bioscience, 2, 5, Biogen, 2, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Corcept Therapeutics, 2, 5, Crisalis, 2, 5, CSL Behring, 2, 5, Cugene, 2, 5, EMD Serono, 2, 5, Genentech, 2, 5, Gilead, 2, 5, GSK, 2, 5, Idera Pharmaceuticals, 2, 5, Incyte, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Kyowa Kirin, 2, 5, Lilly, 2, 5, Lupus Research Alliance, 2, 5, Medimmune, 2, 5, Medscape, 2, 5, Nektar, 2, 5, Principia Biopharma, 2, 5, Resolve Biosciences, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5, Viela Bio, 2, 5; J. Choi: Bristol Myers Squibb, 3, 12, Shareholder, Johnson & Johnson, 12, Shareholder; B. Becker: Bristol Myers Squibb, 3, 12, Shareholder; T. Edwards: None; C. Hobar: Bristol Myers Squibb, 3, 12, Shareholder; S. Pomponi: Bristol Myers Squibb, 3, 12, Shareholder; V. Strand: AbbVie, 1, 2, Alpine Immune Sciences, 1, 2, Alumis, 1, 2, Amgen, 1, 2, AstraZeneca, 1, 2, Bayer, 1, 2, Blackrock Pharmaceuticals, 1, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 1, 2, Bristol Myers Squibb, 1, 2, Celltrion, 1, 2, Citryll, 1, 2, Contura, 1, 2, Equillium, 1, 2, Fortress Biotech, 1, 2, Genentech/Roche, 1, 2, GSK, 1, 2, Inmedix, 1, 2, Janssen, 1, 2, Kiniksa, 1, 2, Lilly, 1, 2, Novartis, 1, 2, Omeros, 1, 2, Pfizer, 1, 2, Priovant Therapeutics, 1, 2, Rapt Therapeutics, 1, 2, Regeneron, 1, 2, R-Pharm, 1, 2, Samsung, 1, 2, Sandoz, 1, 2, Sanofi, 1, 2, Scipher, 1, 2, SetPoint Medical, 1, 2, Sobi, 1, 2, Spherix, 1, 2, SynAct Pharma, 1, 2, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, 1, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Merola J, Werth V, Choi J, Becker B, Edwards T, Hobar C, Pomponi S, Strand V. Qualitative Patient Interview Study in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus to Assess Patient Perception of Fatigue and Skin-Related Symptoms [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/qualitative-patient-interview-study-in-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-to-assess-patient-perception-of-fatigue-and-skin-related-symptoms/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/qualitative-patient-interview-study-in-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-to-assess-patient-perception-of-fatigue-and-skin-related-symptoms/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology