ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1002

Prostate Cancer Risk Is Not Increased in Rheumatoid Arthritis After Accounting for Retention in a Health Care System

Kaitlyn Brittan1, Punyasha Roul1, Joshua Baker2, Yangyuna Yang1, Brian Sauer3, Namrata Singh4, Harlan Sayles1, Grant Cannon5, Ted Mikuls1 and Bryant England1, 1University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 2University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 3University of Utah, Omaha, NE, 4University of Washington, Bellevue, WA, 5Salt Lake City VA Medical Center and University of Utah, Salt Lake City

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Administrative Data, Epidemiology, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2020

Title: Epidemiology & Public Health Poster III: Inflammatory Rheumatic Disease

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may have up to a 15% increased risk of prostate cancer per a recent meta-analysis (Simon et al. Arthritis Research & Therapy, 2015). Previously, we found similar rates of prostate cancer in U.S. Veterans with RA as in individuals from the general population via indirect standardization using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (Brittan et al, Abstract #943, 2018). Recognizing the potential for bias based on the referent population and differences in cancer surveillance, we compared the risk of prostate cancer among RA and non-RA patients in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA; direct standardization).

Methods: We performed a retrospective, matched cohort study in the VHA from 2000 to 2018. We identified male patients with RA using a validated administrative algorithm and matched them to male patients without RA (no RA diagnostic codes or DMARDs) on age and enrollment year (up to 1:5). RA and non-RA patients with prior prostate cancer or prostatectomy were excluded. Prostate cancer and prostate cancer death were identified from the VA oncology domain within the Corporate Data Warehouse and the National Death Index.  Multivariable Cox models compared prostate cancer risk after adjusting for race, smoking status, body mass index, Agent Orange exposure, Rheumatic Disease Comorbidity Index score, prostate-specific antigen testing, and health care utilization. Subjects were clustered by the matched RA/non-RA groups. Recognizing the potential for greater retention in the healthcare system and premature mortality among RA patients to influence results, we tested additional models censoring for a gap of >365 days between VA visits and censoring the matched patients at the time of death (in cases unrelated to prostate cancer) in RA patients.

Results: We included 56,514 Veterans with RA and 227,343 Veterans without RA. Mean (SD) age was 64 (11) years and the majority (74% RA, 88% non-RA) were Caucasian. There were 6,550 incident prostate cancers during 2,337,104 patient-years of follow-up. Prostate cancer incidence rates (per 1,000 patient-years) were 3.5 (95% CI 3.3-3.7) in RA and 2.7 (95% CI 2.6-2.7) in non-RA. There was a 28% increased risk of prostate cancer in RA (Model A; Table) that was attenuated to 15% after multivariable adjustment (Model B). Accounting for premature mortality in RA from other causes did not meaningfully affect results (Model C). However, after censoring for a gap of >365 days between VA visits, RA was not significantly associated with prostate cancer risk (Model D: HR 1.07; 95% CI 0.98-1.18; p=0.13). Several sensitivity analyses produced results consistent with the primary results.

Conclusion: Using direct standardization and accounting for relevant confounders and causes of potential bias, we did not find RA to be associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer. These findings highlight the importance of accounting for healthcare system retention when studying cancer risk in rheumatic diseases to prevent detection bias.


Disclosure: K. Brittan, None; P. Roul, None; J. Baker, None; Y. Yang, None; B. Sauer, None; N. Singh, Rheumatology Research Foundation, 2, American Heart Association, 2; H. Sayles, None; G. Cannon, Amgen, Inc., 2, Merck, 2; T. Mikuls, Horizon Therapeutics, 2; B. England, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Brittan K, Roul P, Baker J, Yang Y, Sauer B, Singh N, Sayles H, Cannon G, Mikuls T, England B. Prostate Cancer Risk Is Not Increased in Rheumatoid Arthritis After Accounting for Retention in a Health Care System [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prostate-cancer-risk-is-not-increased-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-after-accounting-for-retention-in-a-health-care-system/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prostate-cancer-risk-is-not-increased-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-after-accounting-for-retention-in-a-health-care-system/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology