ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1009

Promoting Professional Development of Medical Educators in Rheumatology: Perspectives of Clinician Scholar Educators

Juliet Aizer1 and Jeanne Bitterman2, 1Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 2Adult Learning and Leadership, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Education, educator, Leadership, medical, mentor and professional development

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Education

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose:

Recognizing the importance of supporting educators to improve patient care, the Rheumatology Research Foundation (RRF) offers competitive awards for Clinician Scholar Educators (CSE) in rheumatology. CSE awards have provided project-based funding since 1999 and evolved to provide additional financial support for professional development (PD). By analyzing the experiences of CSE awardees we aimed to identify approaches to support PD for educators in rheumatology. 

Methods:

With IRB approval, each of the 53 rheumatologists who had completed CSE awards by 2014 were invited by email to contribute his or her perspective on PD of medical educators in focus groups or individual interviews. Parallel semi-structured formats were used, probing motivation for study participation, motivation for PD, descriptions and impacts of PD, and suggestions for how to support medical educators’ PD. Focus groups and interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. The authors independently reviewed transcripts using a general inductive approach and developed codes sensitized by theories of adult learning. Investigators compared and contrasted findings, arriving at an expanded and then condensed set of themes.   

Results:

In November 2014, 20 rheumatologists participated in 1-hour focus groups at the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Annual Scientific Meeting.  Focus group size ranged from 3-7 participants. Between December 2014 and May 2015, 6 rheumatologists participated in individual telephone interviews, 25-35 minutes in duration.  In total, perspectives of 49% (26/53) of CSE awardees were captured. Gender distribution of participants (54% women) was similar to that of awardees (47% women).  A similar number of participants had received the award in the first 7 years the CSE award was offered as in the subsequent years (12 versus 14).

Interviews captured greater detail than focus groups; overall themes from the focus groups were corroborated in the interviews. Participants cited commitment to supporting medical education, medical educators, the community of CSE awardees, an individual CSE awardee, and the ACR/RRF as motivating factors for study participation. A minority attended to hear others’ experiences. PD experiences before, during and after CSE award funding were described. 

Participants emphasized the value of communities of educators, including the community of CSE awardees, as well as communities of program directors, course directors, educators in formal education programs, and members of Academies of Medical Educators. PD was often triggered by new or desired responsibilities.  Mentorship, collaborations, feedback, inquiry and leadership roles emerged as experiences with critical impact; these were recommended for other educators.

Conclusion:

Experiences reported by CSE awardees as having positive PD impact align most closely with theories of adult development within a constructivist paradigm. Communities of medical educators can be a key source of opportunities for mentorship, team learning, collaborative or collegial inquiry, and leadership roles to promote development of medical educators.


Disclosure: J. Aizer, Hospital for Special Surgery Academy of Medical Educators, 2; J. Bitterman, Teachers College, Columbia University, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Aizer J, Bitterman J. Promoting Professional Development of Medical Educators in Rheumatology: Perspectives of Clinician Scholar Educators [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/promoting-professional-development-of-medical-educators-in-rheumatology-perspectives-of-clinician-scholar-educators/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/promoting-professional-development-of-medical-educators-in-rheumatology-perspectives-of-clinician-scholar-educators/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology