ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0666

Process Mapping Gout Hospitalizations: A Deep Dive into an Avoidable Epidemic

Mark Russell1, Benjamin Ellis2, Benjamin Clarke1, Deepak Nagra1 and James Galloway3, 1King's College London, London, United Kingdom, 2Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom, 3Kings College London, London, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Crystal-induced arthritis, gout, Health policy, Health Services Research, practice guidelines

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 7, 2021

Title: Metabolic & Crystal Arthropathies – Basic & Clinical Science Poster I (0660–0682)

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Hospital admissions for gout flares have increased dramatically in recent years. Strategies to reduce hospitalizations and improve uptake of urate-lowering therapy (ULT) are needed. We performed an in-depth review of gout hospitalizations at our centre, incorporating stakeholder input and process mapping, to identify strategies to prevent admissions.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all emergency department (ED) attendances and hospital admissions for gout flares at two large hospitals in London, UK, from 1st October 2020 to 31st December 2020. Primary and secondary admission diagnoses of gout were included. Data on multiple aspects of hospital and post-discharge care were analysed, including ULT initiation/uptitration, discharge delays and re-admission rates. A process map of the inpatient journey was constructed with input from multiple stakeholders, including patients and clinicians, and strategies to address care barriers were identified.

Results: Detailed case reviews were performed on 68 ED attendances or hospital admissions for gout flares. There was initial diagnostic uncertainty in 32 patients (47%); however, specialist input was rarely sought in ED, and joint aspiration was performed in only 9 patients, with a median delay of 3 days. For the 22 admitted patients, the median length of stay was 11 days (8 days for primary admissions; 17 days for secondary admissions). 18 patients (82%) had discharge delays, including delays in seeking rheumatology input and treatment of comorbid conditions. Forty patients (59%) had pre-existing gout, of whom 25% were on ULT at presentation (mean serum urate level, 6.6 mg/dL). ULT initiation and/or uptitration occurred in 7 patients (10%) during admission or in ED. Of 60 patients with post-discharge follow-up data available, 20 (33%) initiated and/or uptitrated ULT within 6 months (median delay, 32 days), 35 patients (58%) remained on no ULT, and only 2 patients (3%) achieved target serum urate levels. Seven patients (10%) re-presented to hospital within 6 months of discharge.

Through iterative process mapping and stakeholder input, strategies to address care barriers observed during gout hospitalizations were identified. Strategies included initiation of ULT during flares, treat-to-target ULT uptitration coordinated between secondary and primary care, provision of disease-specific patient education and flare management packs, and timely specialist input with joint aspiration and steroid injection as indicated.

Conclusion: We identified multiple barriers to optimal hospitalized gout care and strategies to address them. Effective implementation of evidence-based interventions during hospitalizations for gout could transform care for patients, reduce length of stay, and prevent re-admissions.


Disclosures: M. Russell, Lilly, 6, Pfizer, 6, UCB, 6, Menarini, 6; B. Ellis, Cellen Health, 1, Pfizer, 1; B. Clarke, Abbvie, 6; D. Nagra, None; J. Galloway, Abbvie, 6, Biovitrum, 6, BMS, 6, Celgene, 6, Chugai, 6, Gilead, 6, Janssen, 6, Lilly, 6, Novartis, 6, Pfizer, 6, Roche, 6, Sanofi, 6, Sobi, 6, UCB, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Russell M, Ellis B, Clarke B, Nagra D, Galloway J. Process Mapping Gout Hospitalizations: A Deep Dive into an Avoidable Epidemic [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/process-mapping-gout-hospitalizations-a-deep-dive-into-an-avoidable-epidemic/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/process-mapping-gout-hospitalizations-a-deep-dive-into-an-avoidable-epidemic/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology