ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0132

Prevalence of Osteoporosis and Fragitlity Fractures Is Not Different Between ACPA Positive Patients Compared to ACPA Negative Patients in a Real World Setting, Despite Longer Disease Duration and Glucocorticoid-Treatment

Edgar Wiebe1, Desiree Freier1, Dörte Huscher2, Gloria Dallagiacoma3, Sandra Hermann1, Robert Biesen4, Gerd Burmester5 and Frank Buttgereit6, 1Charité University Medicine Berlin, Dep. of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Berlin, Germany, 2Charité University Medicine Berlin, Dep. of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Berlin, Germany, 3University of Verona, Dep. of Rheumatology, Verona, Italy, 4Charité University Medicine, Dep. of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Berlin, 5Charité University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 6Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Anti-citrullinated Protein Autoantibodies (ACPAs), Fracture, glucocorticoids, osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Friday, November 6, 2020

Title: Osteoporosis & Metabolic Bone Disease Poster

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with increased systemic bone loss, leading to a high risk for hip, vertebral and non-hip, non-vertebral fractures. Especially ACPA positivity is considered a risk factor for local bone erosions and systemic bone loss.

The purpose of this study was to compare ACPA positive versus ACPA negative RA patients in terms of the prevalence of osteoporosis and fragility fractures and to identify differences in underlying risk factors that influence bone health.

Methods: Rh-GIOP is an ongoing prospective observational study collecting and analyzing disease- and bone-related data from patients with chronic rheumatic diseases or psoriasis treated with glucocorticoids (GC). In this cross-sectional analysis, we performed a matched-pair analysis, matching 114 ACPA positive to 114 ACPA negative RA patients according to age (5-year-steps), sex, and body mass index (BMI, 2-unit-steps). Descriptive analyses were performed, with values displayed as mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables. Non-parametric tests were used at a two-sided significance level of 5% to compare differences in underlying and potential risk factors without adjustment for multiple testing.

Results: At same mean age (63.9 ±10.2 years) and BMI (27.9 ±5.6kg/m2), the matched groups had a female proportion of 82.5%. APCA positive patients had a significantly longer mean disease duration (13.9 vs 9.9 years, p< 0.001), a higher mean cumulative GC-dose (22.3 vs 13.2g, p< 0.01) and mean duration of GC therapy (10.1 vs 6.6 years, p< 0.01). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of osteoporosis as defined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (18.4 vs 20.2%), nor in the prevalence of vertebral (7.0 vs 5.3%) or non-vertebral fractures (31.6 vs 29.8%). C-reactive protein levels as a marker of disease activity were significantly higher in ACPA positive patients (mean: 8.8 vs 4.3mg/l, p= 0.02), while mean disease activity score (DAS)28 levels were slightly lower in ACPA positive patients (2.4 vs 2.7, p= 0.05). No difference in health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) was found. RA-specific treatments were similar, especially concerning current daily GC-dose (8.6mg vs 7.1mg/day), except for Rituximab and targeted synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) which were more commonly used in ACPA positive patients (9.6 vs 2.6%, p=0.05) and (5.3 vs 0%, p=0.029), respectively. ACPA positive patients did not differ significantly from ACPA negative patients in specific anti-osteoporotic treatment, nor in the prevalence of comorbidities or concomitant medication. There were no significant differences in bone-specific laboratory parameters. 

Conclusion: In a cross-sectional analysis of our cohort, the prevalence of osteoporosis and fragility fractures was similar between ACPA positive and ACPA negative RA patients, despite longer disease duration and GC-treatment in ACPA positive patients. This is remarkable since it implies that ACPA negative patients are at a similar risk for osteoporosis and associated fractures. 


Disclosure: E. Wiebe, None; D. Freier, None; D. Huscher, None; G. Dallagiacoma, None; S. Hermann, None; R. Biesen, None; G. Burmester, AbbVie, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, Celgene, 5; F. Buttgereit, AbbVie, 8, Eli Lilly, 8, Pfizer, 8, Roche, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Wiebe E, Freier D, Huscher D, Dallagiacoma G, Hermann S, Biesen R, Burmester G, Buttgereit F. Prevalence of Osteoporosis and Fragitlity Fractures Is Not Different Between ACPA Positive Patients Compared to ACPA Negative Patients in a Real World Setting, Despite Longer Disease Duration and Glucocorticoid-Treatment [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prevalence-of-osteoporosis-and-fragitlity-fractures-is-not-different-between-acpa-positive-patients-compared-to-acpa-negative-patients-in-a-real-world-setting-despite-longer-disease-duration-and-gluc/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prevalence-of-osteoporosis-and-fragitlity-fractures-is-not-different-between-acpa-positive-patients-compared-to-acpa-negative-patients-in-a-real-world-setting-despite-longer-disease-duration-and-gluc/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology