ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2823

Preliminary Comparison of Patient-Centered Weight Loss Programs Starting before Versus after Knee Replacement

Christine Pellegrini1,2, Rowland W. Chang3, Dorothy D. Dunlop4, David Conroy1,5, Julia (Jungwha) Lee6, Linda VanHorn6, Bonnie Spring1 and Kenzie Cameron7, 1Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 2Exercise Science, University of South Carolina's Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, SC, 3Rheumatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 4Center for Healthcare Studies, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 5Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 6Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 7General Internal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: arthroplasty and weight loss, Intervention, Knee

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: ARHP: Exemplary Abstracts

Session Type: ARHP Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Most patients risk gaining weight in the years after knee replacement, adding further concern to a population that is mostly overweight/obese prior to surgery. Based on patient and stakeholder input and the Self-Determination Theory, we adapted the Diabetes Prevention Program to create the Patient-Centered Weight Loss Program (PACE). The purpose of the study was to compare changes in weight, function, and patient-reported outcomes between PACE programs initiated either before or after knee replacement.

Methods: Consented patients scheduled for knee replacement were randomized to a 14 session weight loss program starting either ≤6 weeks before surgery (PACE) or at 12 weeks post-op (Delayed PACE). All participants were provided a calorie goal to facilitate a 5% weight loss and were encouraged to increase physical activity. Patients were encouraged to self-monitor diet and activity using their preferred method (paper, web, app, Fitbit) and selected weekly or biweekly coaching sessions based on preference. Weight, function, and patient-reported outcomes using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) were assessed at baseline (pre-op), 12, and 26 weeks after surgery. Repeated measures ANOVAs were used to examine changes in outcomes across time and group.

Results: Ten participants (5 randomized to PACE and 5 to Delayed PACE) completed the PACE intervention (mean±SD 62.2±7.9 years, 60% female, 80% White, BMI 35.2±5.4 kg/m2). Participants completed an average of 9.6±2.2 coaching sessions that were 15.2±3.4 minutes in duration. A significant effect for time (P<0.001) and a time by group interaction (P=0.01) were observed on weight change. Improvements over time were seen for all functional outcomes and patient-reported outcomes with the exception of sleep disturbance. No baseline differences were seen between groups.

Conclusion: Starting a patient-centered weight loss program either before or after knee replacement resulted in significant weight losses at 12 and 26 weeks post-op. Patients appear to naturally lose weight immediately post-op; hence waiting to start a weight loss program 12-weeks post-op may initiate greater weight loss during the first 6 months after surgery as compared to those who start ≤6 weeks pre-op.  

 

Table 1. Weight, Physical Function, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Groups

Outcome

PACE (n=5)

Delayed (n=5)

Mean Group (Delayed – PACE) Difference (95% CI)

P values

Mean ± SD

Group

Time

Group x Time

Body Weight

 

 

 

 

 

Weight (lbs)

     Baseline

     12 Weeks

     26 Weeks

220.3 ± 24.1

211.0 ± 25.7

211.0 ± 23.8

213.8 ± 22.2

207.2 ± 25.0

190.4 ± 20.5

2.7 (-10.8, 16.2)

-14.1 (-24.9, -3.2)

0.50

<0.001**

0.01*

Physical Function

 

 

 

 

 

Timed Up & Go (secs)

     Baseline

     12 Weeks

     26 Weeks

9.2 ± 1.9

8.3 ± 1.0

7.8 ± 0.7

8.0 ± 2.8

7.2 ± 1.7

7.1 ± 1.3

0.04 (-1.7, 1.8)

0.5 (-1.8, 2.8)

0.35

0.03*

0.79

6 Minute Walk (Feet)

     Baseline

     12 Weeks

     26 Weeks

1173.5 ± 323.1

1393.7 ± 365.1

1489.0 ± 430.9

1333.5 ± 314.1

1499.0 ± 370.9

1642.2 ± 445.5

-54.7 (-221.1, 111.7)

-6.8 (-266.7, 253.1)

0.57

<0.001**

0.79

Chair Stands (stands/30 secs)

     Baseline

     12 Weeks

     26 Weeks

10.4 ± 2.4

11.0 ± 3.7

13.2 ± 3.1

10.6 ± 2.9

14.2 ± 4.1

15.0 ± 3.8

3 (-.0.6, 6.6)

1.6 (-0.3, 3.5)

0.42

<0.001**

0.09

PROMIS Outcomes

 

 

 

Pain Intensity (t score)

     Baseline

     12 Weeks

     26 Weeks

51.7 ± 5.8

44.1 ± 4.4

38.0 ± 4.2

51.6 ± 5.1

43.6 ± 7.9

37.0 ± 9.6

-0.3 (-9.4, 8.8)

-0.9 (-12.3, 10.5)

0.88

<0.001**

0.98

Pain Interference (t score)

     Baseline

     12 Weeks

     26 Weeks

58.8 ± 5.6

54.4 ± 3.2

49.4 ± 7.2

60.3 ± 4.0

53.0 ± 8.3

44.5 ± 8.6

-2.9 (-11.5, 5.6)

-6.4 (-20.1, 7.4)

0.60

0.001*

0.46

Mobility (t score)

     Baseline

     12 Weeks

     26 Weeks

36.2 ± 5.1

40.6 ± 7.2

42.2 ± 3.5

37.6 ± 3.4

43.7 ± 5.4

47.8 ± 7.5

1.7 (-5.2, 8.5)

4.1 (-4.0, 12.2)

0.30

<0.001**

0.43

Sleep Disturbance (t score)

     Baseline

     12 Weeks

     26 Weeks

52.0 ± 9.2

51.7 ± 10.4

44.7 ± 5.5

53.2 ± 6.0

52.3 ± 4.5

49.4 ± 9.1

-0.5 (-11.6, 10.5)

3.5 (-8.1, 15.0)

0.60

0.07

0.68

 


Disclosure: C. Pellegrini, None; R. W. Chang, None; D. D. Dunlop, None; D. Conroy, None; J. Lee, None; L. VanHorn, None; B. Spring, Actigraph, 9,Arrivale, 9; K. Cameron, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Pellegrini C, Chang RW, Dunlop DD, Conroy D, Lee J, VanHorn L, Spring B, Cameron K. Preliminary Comparison of Patient-Centered Weight Loss Programs Starting before Versus after Knee Replacement [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/preliminary-comparison-of-patient-centered-weight-loss-programs-starting-before-versus-after-knee-replacement/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/preliminary-comparison-of-patient-centered-weight-loss-programs-starting-before-versus-after-knee-replacement/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology