ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0432

Predictors of Use, Survival and Safety of Tofacitinib Monotherapy vs. in Combination with CsDMARDs in Daily Clinical Practice

Rodolfo Perez-Alamino1, Carolina Isnardi2, Enrique Soriano3, Luciano Lo Giudice4, johana zacariaz hereter4, Gustavo Casado5, Victor Caputo5, Andrea Schmichowski5, Cecilia Romeo5, Estela Rivero5, Florencia Savy6, Mercedes García7, Olga Romano1, Hernan Maldonado Ficco8 and Gustavo Citera2, 1Hospital Avellaneda, Tucuman, Argentina, 2IREP, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 3Rheumatology Section, Internal Medicine Services, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, and University Institute Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 4Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 5Hospital Militar Central, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 6HIGA San Martin, La Plata, Argentina, 7Hospital Interzonal General de Agudos José de San Martín, La Plata, Argentina, 8Hospital San Antonio de Padua, Río Cuarto, Argentina

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Cohort Study, registry, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 12, 2023

Title: (0423–0459) RA – Treatments Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Different guidelines recommend the use of tofacitinib either in monotherapy or combined with methotrexate (combination therapy) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) or biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs). Although the evidence originating from clinical trials does not show notable differences in terms of efficacy and safety with both strategies, data from real life is limited.

To evaluate the frequency, predictors of use and survival of tofacitinib in monotherapy compared with combination therapy in a cohort of patients with RA from daily clinical practice in our country.

Methods: Longitudinal, observational study which includes a cohort of patients with RA (ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria) from different rheumatology centers who started treatment with tofacitinib. Patients were evaluated at baseline and followed up every six months from the start of medication. Sociodemographic, clinical and treatment data were collected. Chi2 test, Fisher’s exact test, Student’s T test and Mann Whitney were used according to the nature of the variables. Kaplan-Meier method and the Log Rank test were applied to compare survival of treatment in monotherapy vs. combination therapy. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate variables associated with lower survival. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was calculated as events every 100 patients/year (p/y). A p< 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: 269 patients were included, 87% female, mean age 56.3 years (SD 13.6), of which 41.3% started treatment with tofacitinib monotherapy. Main reasons for monotherapy use were previous adverse events with csDMARD (16%) and physician’s decision (16%). In the univariate analysis, no significant association was found between the use of monotherapy and different sociodemographic and clinical variables. In the multivariate analysis, fewer prior cs-DMARDs combination therapy and prior use of biologic therapy were significantly associated with initiation of tofacitinib monotherapy (p< 0.05, both) (table). During follow-up (502.4 patients/year), no statistically significant differences were found in tofacitinib survival between the two groups (figure). Regarding safety, 110 patients (40.9%) had at least 1 AE, the most frequent being infections (57.6%), others (16.7%), and gastrointestinal (9.5%). When evaluating the incidence rate (IR) of AEs, no significant differences were found between tofacitinib monotherapy and combination therapy: 47.2 events (100 p/y) (95% CI 38.6-57.5) vs. 38.05 events (100 p/y) (95%CI 31.6-45.7), respectively (p=NS).

Conclusion: In this real-life study, the use of tofacitinib monotherapy was almost 40%, being associated with less prior treatment with csDMARDs and prior use of biologic therapy. Tofacitinib monotherapy demonstrated similar drug survival and safety compared to the use in combination with csDMARDs, and may be a valid option for patients with RA in daily clinical practice.

Supporting image 1

Predictors factors of initiation of treatment with tofacitinib monotherapy

Supporting image 2

Cumulative survival analysis between tofacitinib monotherapy vs. combination therapy


Disclosures: R. Perez-Alamino: None; C. Isnardi: None; E. Soriano: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 6, Eli Lilly, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 5, 6, Roche, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 5, 6; L. Lo Giudice: None; j. zacariaz hereter: None; G. Casado: None; V. Caputo: None; A. Schmichowski: None; C. Romeo: None; E. Rivero: None; F. Savy: None; M. García: GSK, 6, Janssen, 6, Pfizer, 6; O. Romano: None; H. Maldonado Ficco: None; G. Citera: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Perez-Alamino R, Isnardi C, Soriano E, Lo Giudice L, zacariaz hereter j, Casado G, Caputo V, Schmichowski A, Romeo C, Rivero E, Savy F, García M, Romano O, Maldonado Ficco H, Citera G. Predictors of Use, Survival and Safety of Tofacitinib Monotherapy vs. in Combination with CsDMARDs in Daily Clinical Practice [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/predictors-of-use-survival-and-safety-of-tofacitinib-monotherapy-vs-in-combination-with-csdmards-in-daily-clinical-practice/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/predictors-of-use-survival-and-safety-of-tofacitinib-monotherapy-vs-in-combination-with-csdmards-in-daily-clinical-practice/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology