ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2804

Predictors of Survival in Renal Transplantation for Lupus Nephritis – 40 Patients in 40 Years

Eleana Ntatsaki1, Alba Velo Garcia2, Borja del Carmelo Gracia Tello Sr.3, Alan D. Salama4 and David A. Isenberg5, 1Centre for Rheumatology, University College London, London, United Kingdom, 2Internal Medicine Department, University Hospital Complex of Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Spain, 3Internal Medicina, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain, 4Centre for Nephrology, University College London, London, United Kingdom, 5Centre for Rheumatology, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Lupus nephritis, outcomes, renal disease and transplantation, SLE

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Aspects and Treatment - Poster III: Biomarkers and Nephritis

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Lupus nephritis (LN) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), leading to end stage renal failure (ESRF) in up to a quarter of the patients and  often necessitating transplantation. Predicting adverse clinical outcomes in such patients remains challenging. We aimed to identify predictors of survival in our cohort of SLE patients undergoing renal transplantation (rTp).

Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of all SLE patients under long term follow up who developed renal failure in the 40 year period (1975-2015) in two tertiary centres. Hospital notes, electronic records and correspondence from Family Physicians and colleagues in other hospitals were reviewed. Cox proportional hazard regression and receiver operator curves (ROC) were used to determine potential predictors. Amongst the factors considered were duration of SLE diagnosis, ethnicity, gender, age at onset of SLE and LN, serology (including dsDNA binding and antiphospholipid antibodies and complement levels), comorbidities (including diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia and cardiovascular disease), class of LN on biopsy, decade of rTp, drugs and  adherence to treatment.

Results: Over the last 40 years, from a total of 361 patients with LN, 40 patients (age 35±11 years, 34 female (85%), of which 15 Caucasian (38%), 15 Afro Caribbean (38%), and 10  Asian (25%)) underwent rTp. During a median follow up of 85 months (IQR 63,127) 6 patients died (15% mortality) and the five year survival was 95% (table 1). Univariate analysis only identified time on dialysis prior to rTp as a predictor of survival with a Hazard Ratio of 1.017 for each additional month spent on dialysis (95%CI= 1.000-1.034, p=0.044). ROC curves were used to calculate the optimal maximum time on dialysis prior to conferring an adverse outcome showing that ≥23 months on dialysis had an adverse effect with sensitivity of 0.800 and specificity 0.430 of death (figure1).

Conclusion: To predict adverse outcomes in rTp remains challenging. The only potential modifiable risk identified is time spent on dialysis prior to rTp with patients spending <23 months on dialysis having a beneficial outcome. Table 1: Cohort characteristics

Dead (n=6) Alive (n=34)
Gender

0/6 male

6/36 male

Age at lupus diagnosis (years)

22.8±10.1

20.7±9.5

Age at renal transplant (years)

34.5±12.9

35.2±10.9

Time (duration) on dialysis prior to transplant (months)

67±46

32±33

LN duration at transplant (months)

111±61

209±354

Ethnicity
                       Caucasian

2 (33%)

13 (38%)

                       Black

0

15 (44%)

                       Asian

4 (67%)

6 (18%)

Class of LN  Class IV

4 (67%)

12 (35%)

Analysis  per decade

Five year mortality

rTp’s per decade

1975-1985

0/2

2

1985-1995

1/3 (33%)

3

1995-2005

2/8 (40%)

8

2005-2015

0/19

27

Figure 1 Area under the curve showing fair accuracy (0.7) and indicating that patients on dialysis prior to rTp for more than 23 months have an adverse outcome (sensitivity 0.8, specificity 0.43).


Disclosure: E. Ntatsaki, None; A. Velo Garcia, None; B. D. C. Gracia Tello Sr., None; A. D. Salama, None; D. A. Isenberg, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ntatsaki E, Velo Garcia A, Gracia Tello BDC Sr., Salama AD, Isenberg DA. Predictors of Survival in Renal Transplantation for Lupus Nephritis – 40 Patients in 40 Years [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/predictors-of-survival-in-renal-transplantation-for-lupus-nephritis-40-patients-in-40-years/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/predictors-of-survival-in-renal-transplantation-for-lupus-nephritis-40-patients-in-40-years/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology