ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1107

Predictors of Pegloticase Urate-lowering Response in the Presence and Absence of Methotrexate Co-therapy

James Mossell1, Mai Duong2, Katie Obermeyer2, Lissa Padnick-Silver2, Brian LaMoreaux2 and Sanjay Chabra3, 1Arthritis and Osteoporosis Center of South Georgia, Tifton, GA, 2Horizon Therapeutics, Deerfield, IL, 3Texas Arthritis Center, El Paso, TX

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Biologicals, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), gout, Uric Acid, Urate

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 13, 2023

Title: (1100–1123) Metabolic & Crystal Arthropathies – Basic & Clinical Science Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Pegloticase can lower serum urate (SU) in patients with uncontrolled gout who are refractory to/intolerant of oral urate-lowering therapies. However, antidrug antibodies (ADAs) can limit pegloticase treatment response and put patients at risk for infusion reactions (IRs).1,2 Co-administering methotrexate (MTX) with pegloticase attenuates ADAs, resulting in improved response rates (71% vs. 39% during Month 6) and decreased IR risk (4% vs. 31%).3 Here we examine potential baseline factors that may influence urate-lowering response to pegloticase.

Methods: These analyses included uncontrolled gout patients who received biweekly pegloticase (8 mg) in the Phase 3 pegloticase registration1 and MIRROR RCT2 trials. Patients were included if they had received ≥1 pegloticase infusion. Treatment response was defined as SU < 6 mg/dL for at least 80% of Month 6. A classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was performed in patients who did (MIRROR RCT MTX arm) and did not (Phase 3, MIRROR RCT PBO arm) receive MTX co-therapy with pegloticase. CART analyses split datasets based on data homogeneity, providing insight on outcome prediction factors. The following pre-treatment factors were considered: patient age, sex, weight, BMI, SU, and ADA status (positive/negative).

Results: Baseline characteristics in pegloticase monotherapy (N=134; age: 54.9±14.5 years, 82.1% men, BMI: 33.0±7.5 kg/m2, weight: 99.2±23.3 kg) and pegloticase+MTX (N=96; age: 56.0±12.5 years, 91.7% men, BMI: 32.8±5.6 kg/m2, weight: 102.6±19.4 kg) groups were similar. 57 monotherapy (42.5%) and 71 MTX (74.0%) patients were treatment responders. For the pegloticase monotherapy group, CART analysis selected an age cut-off of 46 years ( < 46 years: 14.7% response, ≥46 years: 59.0% response) as a first-level predictor and a body weight cut-off of 85 kg as a second level predictor (Figure, Part A). For the pegloticase+MTX group, CART analysis returned no decision tree. This finding indicates that no examined factors predicted pegloticase treatment response in the presence of MTX co-therapy. Although age did not predict treatment response in patients receiving MTX co-therapy, those ≥46 years of age had a higher response rate than those < 46 years of age (cutoff identified in the monotherapy group, 78% vs. 56%; Figure, Part B).

Conclusion: With pegloticase monotherapy, younger patient age and higher body weight were predictors of treatment failure. These findings are in agreement with pharmacokinetic studies showing an influence of ADAs and body surface area on serum pegloticase concentrations. However, in the presence of MTX-co-therapy, neither patient age nor body weight predicted response to pegloticase. These findings further support the importance of MTX co-administration with pegloticase to maximize the number of patients who may benefit from this often last-line therapy.

Supporting image 1

Figure. A. CART decision tree for treatment response in patients receiving pegloticase monotherapy. Pre-treatment factors examined included patient age, sex, weight, BMI, serum urate, and anti-drug antibody status (positive/negative). No decision tree was formed for patients receiving pegloticase+MTX (no examined pre-treatment factor predicted treatment response). B. Proportion of pegloticase treatment responders during Month 6 in pegloticase monotherapy CART age groupings (≥46 years, <46 years). MTX co-therapy led to increased response rate during Month 6 in both age groups.


Disclosures: J. Mossell: Abbvie, 6, Amgen, 6, ANI, 6, Aurinia, 6, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 6, Glaxo Smith Klein (GSK), 6, Horizon Therapeutics, 6, Mallinckodt, 6, Scipher, 6, UCB, 6; M. Duong: Horizon Therapeutics, 3, 12, Stockholder; K. Obermeyer: Horizon Therapeutics, 3, 12, Stockholder; L. Padnick-Silver: Horizon Therapeutics, 3, 12, Stockholder; B. LaMoreaux: Horizon Therapeutics, 3, 12, Stockholder; S. Chabra: Horizon Therapeutics, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mossell J, Duong M, Obermeyer K, Padnick-Silver L, LaMoreaux B, Chabra S. Predictors of Pegloticase Urate-lowering Response in the Presence and Absence of Methotrexate Co-therapy [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/predictors-of-pegloticase-urate-lowering-response-in-the-presence-and-absence-of-methotrexate-co-therapy/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/predictors-of-pegloticase-urate-lowering-response-in-the-presence-and-absence-of-methotrexate-co-therapy/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology