ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0261

Predictors of Future Repeat Renal Biopsies in Patients with Lupus Nephritis and Influence of Repeat Biopsy in Flare Management: A Retrospective Study

Rosalba Santana-Flores1, Anitha Ramu1, Hana Rajevac2 and Belinda Jim3, 1Jacobi Medical Center at Albert Einstein College of Medicine, BRONX, NY, 2James J Peters Medical Center, NEW YORK, NY, 3Jacobi Medical Center at Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New Hyde Park, NY

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Bioinformatics, Lupus nephritis, Nephritis, Renal

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Friday, November 6, 2020

Title: SLE – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster I: Clinical Manifestations

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Repeat renal biopsies are considered in patients with Lupus Nephritis (LN) flares or with failure of response to treatment. The influence of repeat renal biopsies on decisions of further management in LN flares has been debated. We assessed biochemical, pathological and demographic factors and evaluated their impact on risk of repeat renal biopsies. The role of repeat biopsies in further management of LN flares was also assessed.

Methods: Of the 66 biopsy-proven LN patients identified at two institutions in New York from 2000-2019, 16 were identified to have repeat renal biopsies. LN classes were identified based on the 2003 ISN/RPS Classification and tubulointerstitial pathology was defined by use of NIH LN Activity and Chronicity Indices. A logistic regression model and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to analyze the data. P value < 0.05 was deemed to be statistically significant.

Results: Repeat renal biopsies showed that a majority of patients (81%) did not transition between proliferative (class III, IV) and non-proliferative (class II, V) classes of LN. Only 18% of patient’s showed a transition from non-proliferative to proliferative class and none of the patient’s transitioned from proliferative to non-proliferative class of LN. All patients with a class switch to a proliferative type of LN were seen to have an escalation in immunosuppressive therapy. Escalation of immunosuppressive therapy was seen in 77.7% of patients with LN flares having no class switch between non-proliferative and proliferative. There was a statistically significant progression of chronicity index (mean ± SD) from initial (4.2 ± 2.77) to repeat (7.2 ± 2.58) biopsy, P = 0.043. 

The logistic regression model had a 96.9% correct prediction, indicating that the model is highly successful in predicting the outcome. The Chi-square probability value was < 0.0005 and McFadden Pseudo R2 value >0.5, indicating the model is a good fit. The results indicated that sex, age at SLE diagnosis, quality of first biopsy, urine protein creatinine ratio (UPCR) at time of biopsy or Class III LN on initial biopsy influenced either positively or negatively the probability of a repeat renal biopsy. Females are 10% less likely to have repeat biopsies than their male counterparts, P = 0.022. Patient risk of repeat biopsy increased by 0.29% with every 10 year increase of age at SLE diagnosis, P = 0.029 and reduced with increase in number of glomeruli in initial biopsy, P = 0.042. Identification of Class III LN on initial biopsy decreased risk of repeat by 96.9% when compared to Class II and V (P = 0.03); Class IV LN showed no significant correlation. Higher UPCR at time of biopsy increased the risk of repeat biopsy, P = 0.037.

Conclusion: Demographic, serological and pathological factors can be used to assess likelihood of patients requiring repeat renal biopsies in the future. A majority of patient’s did not switch between non-proliferative and proliferative classes of LN on repeat biopsy, however most of these patient’s still had an escalation of immunosuppressive therapy. This study shows that there is little relation between repeat renal biopsy findings in LN flares and its use as a tool in determining further management in LN flares

Description of Explanatory Variables

Descriptive Tabulation of Explanatory Variables in Logistic Regression


Disclosure: R. Santana-Flores, None; A. Ramu, None; H. Rajevac, None; B. Jim, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Santana-Flores R, Ramu A, Rajevac H, Jim B. Predictors of Future Repeat Renal Biopsies in Patients with Lupus Nephritis and Influence of Repeat Biopsy in Flare Management: A Retrospective Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/predictors-of-future-repeat-renal-biopsies-in-patients-with-lupus-nephritis-and-influence-of-repeat-biopsy-in-flare-management-a-retrospective-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/predictors-of-future-repeat-renal-biopsies-in-patients-with-lupus-nephritis-and-influence-of-repeat-biopsy-in-flare-management-a-retrospective-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology