ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2040

Pilot Study Of Abatacept In Patients With Refractory Autoimmune Chronic Urticaria

Clifton O. Bingham III1, Marilyn Towns1 and Susan J. Bartlett2, 1Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 2Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: abatacept and treatment, Autoimmune Skin Disease

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Miscellaneous Rheumatic and Inflammatory Diseases II: Miscellaneous Rheumatic Diseases

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Associations between chronic urticaria (CU) with autoantibodies and other autoimmune conditions have implicated T cells in CU initiation and/or propagation. Many patients (pts) have symptoms that require chronic corticosteroids (CCS) and/or immunomodulatory therapies. We conducted an investigator-initiated pilot study to assess the safety and potential efficacy of abatacept (ABA) in pts with CU. 

Methods: Pts with refractory CU were enrolled in an open-label study of intravenous (IV) ABA (750-1000 mg per body weight) administered at baseline, 2 wk, 4 wk, and 8 wk (clinicaltrials.gov NCT00886795). Pts had required previous CCS and failed other immunomodulators. If symptoms improved, sequential tapering of CCS and/or antihistamines was permitted. Outcomes included Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), urticaria severity score, number of hives, interference with sleep and daily activities, MD and Pt assessments of response, and SF-36. Safety was carefully monitored during infusions; adverse events were recorded using the OMERACT Rheumatology CTCAE v2.0. Funding and study drug were provided by BMS, who had no role in study conduct, data analysis, or decision to submit abstract.

Results: Four pts (2M/2F) were enrolled (32-51 yo; urticaria duration: 3-29 yr). Prior immunomodulatory therapies included sulfasalazine (SSZ), hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), methotrexate, azathioprine, adalimumab, mycophenolate, and cyclosporine. At baseline 2 pts were on CCS, 1 was on SSZ, and 1 was on HCQ, continued per protocol. All pts improved from their baseline clinical state by 3 months (mo), in terms of most pt-reported outcomes and in MD-reported variables. Three pts had complete urticaria resolution. One pt improved from baseline but remained symptomatic and exited at 3 mo. For all pts there was considerable improvement in DLQI (Figure). In 3 pts, background medications were tapered (CCS elimination in 1; antihistamine tapering in 3). Two pts continue to do well off ABA, requiring only periodic non-sedating antihistamines for intermittent pruritus (Time since last ABA infusion 7 mo and 24 mo). One pt had recurrent urticaria approximately 3 mo after last ABA infusion, with response rapidly recaptured with SQ ABA administered outside the study. ABA infusions were well-tolerated with no worsening urticaria, angioedema, or anaphylaxis. Upper respiratory infections (mild) were consistent with ABA studies for other indications.

Conclusion: A 2 mo intervention with IV ABA led to improvement in 4 pts with immunomodulatory therapy-resistant CU. For 3 pts there was a rapid and complete response; in the 4th there was a clinically detectable improvement. Limitations are the small number of pts and open-label design. These results suggest a fundamental role for T cells in CU pathogenesis.

 

DLQI over time (MID in CU 2.24-3.1). Timing of Abatacept infusions indicated with *.


Disclosure:

C. O. Bingham III,

BMS,

5,

BMS,

2;

M. Towns,
None;

S. J. Bartlett,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/pilot-study-of-abatacept-in-patients-with-refractory-autoimmune-chronic-urticaria/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology