ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1213

Persisting Pain in Rheumatoid Arthritis – an Essential yet Underrated Challenge

Christoph Baerwald1, Edgar Stemmler2, Sixten Gnuechtel2, Katharina Birkner2, Carsten Holland3, Bjoern Fritz2, Daniela Adolf4 and Ralf Baron5, 1University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany, 2AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co KG, Wiesbaden, Germany, 3AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Wiesbaden, 4StatConsult GmbH, Biometry and Data Management, Magdeburg, Germany, 5University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: pain, Patient reported outcomes, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 8, 2021

Title: RA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster III: Prediction, Biomarkers, & Treatment Response (1196–1222)

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Pain is the symptom with the most significant impact on patients’ lives in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), whereas 17% of German RA patients report severe pain [1, 2]. Although RA patients may no longer report pain due to an articular, inflammatory origin, neuropathic pain (NP) may compromise anti-rheumatic treatment success as well.

The data-analysis presented aimed to investigate the proportion of RA patients with persisting pain and suggest clinical practice implications given specified patient-reported outcomes.

Methods: The PAIN-CONTROL study is a prospective, non-interventional, multicenter study in specialized rheumatology centers across Germany. Patients had to fulfill these inclusion criteria: 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for RA, disease duration < 8 yrs, Disease Activity Index 28 (DAS28) ≥ 3.2, SJC ≥ 3, CRP above the reference range, and a visual analog scale (VAS, 0-100) pain rating ≥ 50. Eligible subjects had to be scheduled for initiation or escalation of anti-inflammatory treatment. At wk 24, clinical outcomes were evaluated, and subjects were allocated to three subgroups: Group 1 (reference): DAS28 improvement > 1.2 or DAS28 ≤ 3.2, VAS pain < 50; group 2 (non-responders): DAS28 improvement ≤ 1.2 or DAS28 > 3.2 with or without alleviation of pain; group 3 (persisting pain): DAS28 improvement > 1.2 or DAS28 ≤ 3.2, VAS pain ≥ 50. For subjects in groups 1 and 2, the study ended at wk 24, subjects in group 3 continued until wk 48. This descriptive, interim analysis includes subjects having completed the study until Sept. 30th 2020, and informs about subjects classified as having NP by a painDETECT questionnaire (PDQ) score of ≥ 19. The attainment of a patient acceptable symptom state (i.e., Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID-PASS) score ≤ 2), and the proportion of patients with moderate depressive symptoms or worse according to the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (i.e., PHQ-9 ≥ 10) were specified as secondary outcomes of interest. Descriptive results are presented as mean±SD or n (%), respectively.

Results: Sample characteristics (N=263) at baseline were as follows: Age 57.6 ± 13.0 yrs, disease duration 2.4 ± 2.6yrs, DAS28(CRP) 5.3 ± 0.8 with 174(66.2%) female subjects. At wk 24, the proportion of subjects who tested positive for NP in group 3 (persisting pain) was similar to group 2 (non-responder), (N=18; 25.0%) vs. (N=15; 25.9%). The number of patients with NP in group 3 decreased until wk 48, (N=10; 19.6%). Between wks 24 and 48, the number of subjects in group 3 attaining RAID-PASS increased from N=6 (8.3%) to N=12 (23.5%). Simultaneously, their DAS28(CRP) decreased from 3.4 ± 1.0 to 2.9 ± 1.2, respectively. During this period of the study, the proportion of patients in group 3 with moderate depressive symptoms or worse hardly changed (wk 24: 10(13.9%), wk 48: 7(13.7%)). For details see table 1.

Conclusion: NP is a frequent underrated challenge in RA patients either not responding to anti-inflammatory treatment or patients with persisting pain. These patient groups are likely to benefit from a multi-disciplinary treatment approach, including tailored pain management.

1. Bischoff S et al. Annual Report – National Database, 2012, DRFZ, Germany

2. Gossec L et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Nov;68(11):1680–5


Disclosures: C. Baerwald, Abbvie, 1, 2, 5, 6; E. Stemmler, Abbvie, 3, 11; S. Gnuechtel, Abbvie, 3, 11; K. Birkner, Abbvie, 3, 11; C. Holland, AbbVie, 3, 11; B. Fritz, Abbvie, 3, 11; D. Adolf, StatConsult, 3, 11; R. Baron, Abbvie, 2, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Baerwald C, Stemmler E, Gnuechtel S, Birkner K, Holland C, Fritz B, Adolf D, Baron R. Persisting Pain in Rheumatoid Arthritis – an Essential yet Underrated Challenge [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/persisting-pain-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-an-essential-yet-underrated-challenge/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/persisting-pain-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-an-essential-yet-underrated-challenge/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology