ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
    • 2017-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • Meeting Resource Center

Abstract Number: 2012

Pediatric Rheumatology Productivity: Results of the American Academy of Pediatrics 2010 Workforce Survey

Michael Henrickson1 and Laura Laskosz2, 1MLC 4010, Division of Rheumatology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, 2Division of Technical and Medical Services, The American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, IL

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Access to care, pediatric rheumatology and questionnaires

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Session Title: Pediatric Rheumatology - Clinical and Therapeutic Aspects: Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Other Pediatric Rheumatic Diseases

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Relative value units (RVUs) are a payer-neutral measure of clinical work. The federal government uses a multi-component formula to convert this measure into reimbursement. The Association of Administrators in Academic Pediatrics (AAAP) surveys its practitioners to derive benchmark RVU data, aided by its affiliation with a leading medical management group (MMG). No other benchmarks exist for pediatric rheumatologists (PRs).  While PRs largely practice at academic centers, they also work in a variety of settings. PR reimbursement follows a number of models, lacking uniformity or national consensus for practice diversity.  Reimbursement estimates may also derive from adjusted adult rheumatology (AR) or various MMG putative standards. Providers can use RVU data to advocate for additional PR clinical support. Through a cross-sectional survey of all board-certified US PRs administered by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), this study’s objective was to determine clinical productivity through annual RVU data, obtain demographic and CPT coding data, and establish national benchmarks independent of an MMG.

Methods: An IRB-approved survey asked PRs (N=206) to provide data about their annual RVUs for fiscal year 2008-09, and detailed demographics including clinical full time equivalent (FTE) status. Statistical analysis included the two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for distribution and t-test for comparison of means.

Results: The overall response was 65% (n=133); 60% of respondents (80/133) provided RVU data including one high volume outlier. AAAP RVU data obtained from 38 centers in the same survey year served as controls (n=79).  AAP and AAAP RVU data were normally distributed (p=0.129); but, their means were significantly different (p=0.013) [Table].  AAP demographic data revealed: median FTE=0.6 (0.1-1); 99% PR and 8% AR board certification; median practice years=16.2 (range by 5-yr intervals: <5 to >30); median patients/week=25; median work weeks/year=48.5 (range by intervals: <30 to 52); academic location: 66% (n= 69); states represented=34 of 42 supported by PRs (incl. DC); median salary=$158,000; median initial access to care= 6 weeks (1-32), previously 2 weeks (2005 AAP survey). Asked if their institution uses the RVU model to measure clinical productivity, 76% affirmed (n=90); 8% did not know (n=10).

Table: Annual RVUs

Quartile

AAP

AAAP

1st

1000

2073

2nd

1737

3310

3rd

2616

4700

Total

8377

7943

Interquartile range

1616

2627

N

80

79

Conclusion: AAAP RVUs sample only academic sites, limiting generalizability. Further, AAAP adjusts RVUs from partial to full FTE, uniformly inflating data. This practice and AAAP alignment with a commercial MMG preclude its role as the best available PR benchmark. AAP RVUs are normally distributed, representing 81% of the states where PRs practice, with mature demographics and wide practice diversity; they serve as a national benchmark.  During the latter half-decade, the shift from a 2 to 6 week wait to access initial PR care is concerning and indicative of the pressing need for sustained workforce advocacy.


Disclosure:

M. Henrickson,
None;

L. Laskosz,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/pediatric-rheumatology-productivity-results-of-the-american-academy-of-pediatrics-2010-workforce-survey/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

ACR Pediatric Rheumatology Symposium 2020

© COPYRIGHT 2023 AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RHEUMATOLOGY

Wiley

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
  • Advanced Search
  • Meeting Resource Center
  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences