ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1813

Patient-Reported Outcomes in CPPD Compared to Gout and Osteoarthritis

Mary Grace Whelan1, Keigo Hayashi2 and Sara Tedeschi1, 1Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 2Brigham and Women's Hospital, Okayama, Japan

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: CPPD, Crystal-induced arthritis, Outcome measures, pseudogout, WOMAC

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2022

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies – Basic and Clinical Science Poster

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) disease prevalence is similar to gout and osteoarthritis (OA), yet CPPD outcomes research greatly lags behind these other forms of arthritis. We compared validated patient-reported outcome measures in a prospective single center CPPD registry versus clinic-based gout and OA cohorts from the literature.

Methods: Potential CPPD registry participants were identified using electronic health record (EHR) data from a single academic medical center, Feb-May 2022. Presence of 1 or more CPPD manifestation (acute calcium pyrophosphate [CPP] crystal arthritis, OA with CPPD, and chronic CPP inflammatory arthritis) was assessed by manual EHR review and surveys. Baseline surveys included the Gout Assessment Questionnaire (GAQ 2.0) modified to ask about “pseudogout” rather than “gout” (range 0-100), RAPID3 (range 0-30), and WOMAC (ranges: pain, 5-25; stiffness, 2-10; function, 17-85). We used t-tests to compare responses in the CPPD registry against historical gout and OA controls from cohort studies that reported the same outcome measures.1-3

Results: Among 24 CPPD patients, mean age was 72.8 and 42% were female (Table 1). 19 had at least 1 episode of acute CPP crystal arthritis, 6 had chronic CPP inflammatory arthritis, and 18 had OA with CPPD. CPPD patients had significantly fewer joints involved during a flare (2.4± 2.7) than gout patients (5.2 ± 6.9) (p< 0.01), though pain visual analog scale (range 0-10) scores during a flare were similar in CPPD (6.4 ± 2.1) and gout (6.7 ± 2.6) (p=0.59). CPPD patients reported significantly greater unmet treatment need than gout patients (p< 0.01) (Figure 1). RAPID3 scores in CPPD (8.8 ± 5.0) indicated lower disease activity than in gout (12.1 ±6.2) (p=0.03) and similar disease activity to OA (6.8 ± 6.1) (p=0.20). CPPD patients had significantly worse WOMAC pain and WOMAC stiffness scores than patients with mild OA, and significantly better WOMAC function scores than patients with severe OA (Figure 2).

Conclusion: These preliminary data suggest that patients with CPPD may experience pain comparable to gout and OA, though future studies are needed to validate these outcome measures in CPPD. Patients with CPPD reported substantial unmet treatment needs. Ongoing recruitment to the CPPD registry will contribute further data regarding this common yet understudied arthritis.

References
1. Hirsch JD, et al. Patient Relat Outcome Meas 2010.
2. Castrejón I, et al. Arthritis Care Res 2013.
3. Woo J, et al. J Rheum 2004.

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of 24 CPPD Subjects

Supporting image 2

Figure 1. Gout/CPPD Impact Scale* Elements
Data are presented as mean (dot), standard deviation (whiskers)
*Gout Impact Scale from the GAQ2.0, copyright Takeda; adapted for CPPD with permission from Takeda

Supporting image 3

Figure 2. WOMAC Subscales for CPPD, Mild OA, and Severe OA
Data are presented as mean (dot), standard deviation (whiskers)


Disclosures: M. Whelan, None; K. Hayashi, None; S. Tedeschi, Moderna, NGM Biopharmaceuticals.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Whelan M, Hayashi K, Tedeschi S. Patient-Reported Outcomes in CPPD Compared to Gout and Osteoarthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-reported-outcomes-in-cppd-compared-to-gout-and-osteoarthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-reported-outcomes-in-cppd-compared-to-gout-and-osteoarthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology