ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1157

Patient Perspective on the Non Medical Switch of Originator to Its Biosimilar in Inflammatory Arthritis Using a Social Media Survey

David Vega Morales1, Alejandro Garza-Alpirez2 and Carlos Andrés Díaz-Garza2, 1Hospital Universitario, Garcia, Mexico, 2Tecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, San Pedro, Mexico

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Autoinflammatory diseases, Biologicals, education, patient, Qualitative Research, Surveys

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 8, 2021

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes Poster III: Patient Preferences (1153–1169)

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: The use of biosimilars instead of its originator is a controversial subject with many implications. It is considered that a non medical switch should not occur and that pts and physicians must be involved in the decision of choosing the adequate medication.

Methods: A social media survey via The Mexican Foundation for Rheumatic Patients (FUMERAC) (Facebook [FB] and Twitter) was conducted in Mexico from November 2020 to January 2021. An opening question to ascertain the consent Pts were eligible if they were >18 years of age and if they had any inflammatory or non inflammatory rheumatic condition and the use of biologics/biosimilars was not mandatory.

Results: A total of 165 pts completed the survey. 81% were women and 79% had high school or higher education. The most frequent diagnoses were RA (56.4%), AS (13.9%), PsA (11.5%) and Lupus (9.1%). DMARD monotherapy was the most common treatment representing 30% of pts. 57% reported prior or current use of biologics. Sixty four percent of pts had never heard the term biosimilar. 38% would accept the change from an originator to its biosimilar if the opinion of the patient and physician was taken into account. 24% of pts would take a legal measure or file a complaint if a NMS was to happen. The subjects asked to pts in order to reduce their inconformity were: treatment effectiveness (65.5%), adverse effects (60%), reason for change (54.4%), treatment duration (29%) and other pts experience (19.3%)

Conclusion: In Mexico the concept of biosimilars is barely known. Most of patients (76%) would not take any measure if they where changed from an originator to its biosimilar. There is still a great amount of confidence from the pts to their physician regarding the management of their medications.

What would you think if your physician changed your originator to its biosimilar without asking nor explaining you?

What would you think if your pharmacist or health insurance policy changed your medication to its biosimilar without informing you or your physician?

Do you think changing your biologic drug to its more economic biosimilar can have a consequence?


Disclosures: D. Vega Morales, None; A. Garza-Alpirez, None; C. Díaz-Garza, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Vega Morales D, Garza-Alpirez A, Díaz-Garza C. Patient Perspective on the Non Medical Switch of Originator to Its Biosimilar in Inflammatory Arthritis Using a Social Media Survey [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-perspective-on-the-non-medical-switch-of-originator-to-its-biosimilar-in-inflammatory-arthritis-using-a-social-media-survey/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-perspective-on-the-non-medical-switch-of-originator-to-its-biosimilar-in-inflammatory-arthritis-using-a-social-media-survey/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology