ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1333

Patient Perceptions of Rheumatoid Arthritis Blood Work: A Cross-sectional Survey in the ArthritisPower Registry

William Nowell1, Shilpa Venkatachalam2, Kelly Gavigan1, Michael George3, Johanna Withers4, Laura Stradford5, Esteban Rivera1 and Jeffrey Curtis6, 1Global Healthy Living Foundation, Upper Nyack, NY, 2Global Healthy Living Foundation, New York, NY, 3University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 4Scipher Medicine Corportaion, Waltham, MA, 5Global Healthy Living Foundation, Nyack, NY, 6Division of Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Biomarkers, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2022

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, and Attitudes Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Although patients’ (pts) perspective on disease-related lab testing and its role in treatment decision-making has been examined for some chronic illnesses, ranging from diabetes to prostate cancer, no published studies have assessed the perspectives of people with RA. Our objective was to examine how pts with RA perceive RA-related lab testing and pts’ perceived utility of a blood test to predict treatment response and allow for personalized selection of a new RA medication.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was developed with input from pts, rheumatologists, researchers, and pt advocates. Members of ArthritisPower with a self-reported physician diagnosis of RA were invited to participate in the online survey which included questions related to reasons for lab testing, plus a choice-based conjoint analysis (CA) exercise to determine how pts value different attributes of a blood test to predict treatment response. For the CA, 48 different hypothetical test characteristics (bundles) were created based on different combinations of 3 test attributes (Accuracy, Wait Time, Cost), each with 3-4 levels. Each pt responded to 5 questions asking them to choose between two of these hypothetical tests, randomized by the Qualtrics survey platform.

Results: During May 2022, 376 RA pts completed the survey, of whom 86.4% were female, 89.3% white, mean age of 58.1 (SD 11.3) years. Pts were on the following medications: 53.2% csDMARD, 79.6% bDMARD, 20.1% tsDMARD (not mutually exclusive). Reasons that most pts perceived that their doctor orders lab work was to check for active inflammation (86.4%) or assess side effects of medications (81.6%). Other reasons included checking for positive rheumatoid factor or other RA antibodies (67.8%), or whether medication is working (59.3%), vitamin levels are good (55.3%), or RA is progressing (54.3%). Pts reported that their rheumatologists most often ordered complete blood count, liver function tests, CRP and ESR to monitor RA, and felt that CRP was most helpful to themselves in understanding their disease activity (Table 1). Most pts were somewhat or very concerned that their current RA medication will stop working for them in the future (91.0%) or that they would waste time trying an RA medication that may not work for them (81.6%). If they had to change RA treatments in the future, a majority (89.4%) would be very or extremely interested in taking a blood test that could help predict whether the medication their doctor suggests will work well for them. In the CA, Accuracy was more important to pts than both Cost and Wait Time (Figure 1). Pts were more likely to select a test that was highly accurate (improving the chance that the next RA medication will work well from 50% to 85-95%), low cost (≤ $20), and fast (≤ 7 days for results) (Figure 2).

Conclusion: Most pts consider RA-related blood work to be important for monitoring active inflammation and medication side effects, and felt that among blood tests, CRP was most helpful to them in understanding their disease activity. For a test predicting treatment response, pts valued accuracy over cost or wait time.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: W. Nowell, AbbVie, Janssen, Scipher Medicine Corporation, PCORI; S. Venkatachalam, None; K. Gavigan, None; M. George, AbbVie, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), Chemocentryx; J. Withers, Scipher Medicine Corporation; L. Stradford, Global Healthy Living Foundation; E. Rivera, None; J. Curtis, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), CorEvitas, IlluminationHealth, Janssen, Lilly, Myriad, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, UCB, Aqtual, Bendcare, FASTER, GlaxoSmithKlein (GSK), Labcorp, Scipher, Setpoint, United Rheumatology, AbbVie, ArthritisPower.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Nowell W, Venkatachalam S, Gavigan K, George M, Withers J, Stradford L, Rivera E, Curtis J. Patient Perceptions of Rheumatoid Arthritis Blood Work: A Cross-sectional Survey in the ArthritisPower Registry [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-perceptions-of-rheumatoid-arthritis-blood-work-a-cross-sectional-survey-in-the-arthritispower-registry/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-perceptions-of-rheumatoid-arthritis-blood-work-a-cross-sectional-survey-in-the-arthritispower-registry/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology