ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0678

Patient Characteristics and Patterns of Urate-lowering Treatments in Older Patients with Incident Gout

Kazuki Yoshida1, Jun Liu2, Daniel H Solomon3 and Seoyoung Kim3, 1Brigham & Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 2Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, 3Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Administrative Data, Comorbidity, gout

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 7, 2020

Title: Metabolic & Crystal Arthropathies Poster

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Gout is a common inflammatory arthritis caused by monosodium urate crystal deposition in the joints.  Despite this well-understood pathophysiologic mechanism of disease and ACR and EULAR recommendations for a treat-to-target strategy with urate-lowering therapy (ULT), management of gout is  generally suboptimal. ULT initiation in older patients with gout can be challenging as many of them have substantial comorbidities. We aimed to examine characteristics of older patients newly diagnosed with gout and their patterns of ULT initiation.

Methods: Using Medicare claims data (2007–2016 Parts A/B/D) linked to EHR from 2 health care provider networks, we identified patients newly diagnosed with gout based on the first gout diagnostic code (ICD9 274.00–03, 81, 82, 39, 9; ICD10 M10) after the baseline period of at least 365 days. All patients were required to be continuously enrolled during the baseline period. Patients with age < 65 or use of any gout-related medications (allopurinol, febuxostat, probenecid, colchicine, lesinurad, and pegloticase) in this period were excluded. We described these incident gout patients for their baseline characteristics, subsequent ULT initiation, and treatment patterns at the initiation.

Results: We identified a total of 20,193 patients who we regarded as incident gout patients by our definition. The mean (SD) age was 77.3 (7.7) years and 48.4% were male. Many patients had comorbidities prior to the gout diagnosis (Table 1). Hypertension was the most common comorbidity (86%) followed by hyperlipidemia (75%), diabetes (36.7%), malignancy (30%), and heart failure (25%). Use of cardiovascular medication was also common (e.g., ACE/ARB 53%, diuretics 55%, and statin 60%). 34% experienced hospitalization during the baseline 365-day period. On average, they visited physician offices 14 times (median 12), emergency department 1.6 times, and took 10.8 discrete medications during the baseline period. During the entire follow-up (median 656 days [25th 168, 75th 1454]), only 24.3% had a ULT initiation. Cumulative incidence of ULT initiation was 17.8% at 1 year 21.2% and at 2 years after the diagnosis, handling disenrollment (55%) as censoring and death (21%) as a competing event. Most ULT initiators (95%) started allopurinol. Febuxostat was used in 3% and probenecid in 2%. The median starting doses were low consistent with ACR guidelines (Table 2). However, concomitant use of colchicine for flare prophylaxis was low (allopurinol 26%; febuxostat 31%), except probenecid (80%), which included a combination formulation.

Conclusion: Older patients with incident gout had a substantial comorbidity and medication burden. The overall rate of ULT initiation was low (< 25%) and suboptimal, particularly in the first year after the diagnosis (18%). While the initial ULT doses were appropriately low as recommended; less than a third used gout flare prophylactic treatments at the time of ULT initiation. As the treat-to-target strategy for gout is contingent upon ULT initiation, better understanding of patient and physician barriers to ULT is essential to improving the quality of care in older patients with gout.


Disclosure: K. Yoshida, OM1, 1, Corrona, 1; J. Liu, None; D. Solomon, AbbVie, 2, Amgen, 1, Genentech, 1, Janssen, 1, Corrona, 1; S. Kim, Pfizer, 1, Roche, 1, AbbVie, 1, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Yoshida K, Liu J, Solomon D, Kim S. Patient Characteristics and Patterns of Urate-lowering Treatments in Older Patients with Incident Gout [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-characteristics-and-patterns-of-urate-lowering-treatments-in-older-patients-with-incident-gout/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-characteristics-and-patterns-of-urate-lowering-treatments-in-older-patients-with-incident-gout/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology